Only if all radios were required to use the same time slot
assignments. That would make full duplex links impossible (or at least
hinder them greatly since they would have to have a down time not to
step on another radios RX period)
On 6/9/07, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WiMAX, scheduled
WiMAX, scheduled Canopy, and any other system that can be synchronized
-- i.e. automatically "cooperate" -- with like systems, but cannot sense
and deal with other resident systems are confined to the lower 25 MHz.
If all units were required to use GPS sync I think the band would be a
much bette
L PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response
today..thelawyerswin most
Hi John,
Well, remember that as far as the FCC is concerned, WiMAX IS
contention-based. Keep in mind they are not
Now, as to your main question about Alvarion...let's just say things are
moving. BreezeMAX, the .16e TDD version has now been commercially
shipping inside the U.S. for a few months so it is a real option.
BreezeACCESS VL is also a real option.
So...VL has a 3650 version ready to go right now
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..the
lawyerswin most
Patrick,
How soon after the R&O comes out can we expect to see Alvario
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I just hope systems like Mikrotik w/ Ubiquiti SR3s/ XR3s(eventu
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:09 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
>
> I just hope systems like Mikrotik w/ Ubiqu
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I just hope systems like Mikrotik w/ Ubiquiti SR3s/ XR3s(eventually) can
be
made certified und
, 2007 1:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I just hope systems like Mikrotik w/ Ubiquiti SR3s/ XR3s(eventually) can
be
made certified under 3650. That will keep the equipment low priced AND
able
to use the whole band. A
they probably didn't even file a 477 or CALEA form.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:57 PM
To: WISPA General List; FCC Discussion
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response
Very interesting clarifications that will be immediately beneficial to
WISPs and others looking to deploy in the band. The big wild card and
open question in my view is the cooperation requirement. The Commission
extensively uses the language about being "required" to cooperate, but
does not fully
11 matches
Mail list logo
