Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-24 Thread John Tully

At 07:34 AM 3/24/2006, you wrote:

John,

 When are we going to see some of the new CPE boards on the market?  I 
forgot their number :-)


Hello Mac,

I can't tell you the details - I wish I could.  There will be a new one 
announced and demonstrated at the MUM!


John
mum.mikrotik.com




Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
Authorized Barracuda Reseller
MikroTik RouterOS Certified
www.inetsouth.com
www.mac-tel.us
www.RadioResponse.org (Katrina Relief)
Rayville, La.
318.728.8600
318.303.4228
318.303.4229





- Original Message - From: "John Tully" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless



At 06:53 AM 3/24/2006, you wrote:

John,

When will we see something with a little more CPU power in an RB style 
configuration? 800mhz would be nice. ;)


We have projects in design now, but we only announce details just before 
we are going into mass production -- and I don't have an estimate for 
that either!


John
www.mikrotik.com



Travis
Microserv

John Tully wrote:




What happened to the RB512's ??



Not enough demand, it seems that people are happy to pay the additional 
dollars for the full RB532.  For those that used the RB512, the RB112 
may be a suitable alternative.


John
mum.mikrotik.com



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On

> Behalf Of John Tully
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:16 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Muni wireless
>
> At 01:39 PM 3/23/2006, you wrote:
> >Have you released any pricing for a 2 and 3 radio system?
>
> Hello Chris,
>
> You can current buy the RB112 for $99 list price -- one Ethernet 
and > two

> mpci.  The RB532 with the RB502 has four mpci and three Eth -- I
guess the
> price is something like $185 list together.
>
> They will both be software upgradable.  The examples you will see 
at > the

> MUM do not have the no config support.  This is in development now.
>
> John
> www.mikrotik.com
>
>
> >  If I could add a
> >word based on experience with more expensive systems- more 
control > >is
> >better.  An easy or auto install system needs to give the 
provider > >every
> >option to inject control at every level.  Lots of monitoring 
stats > >on

> both
> >link and service side are great also.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Chris
> >
> >
> > >>Hello John,
> > >>
> > >>MikroTik is currently developing the biggest feature of mesh --
> > >>easy
> to
> > >>install systems (no configuration required) that have a radio (or
> more)
> > >>for local and a radio (or more) for backbone.  This will 
enable > > >>WISP

> to
> > >>compete better with the expensive Strix and other MESH 
systems. > > >>You

> will
> > >>hear more about this at the MikroTik user meeting in Dallas -
> > >>mum.mikrotik.com .
> > >>
> > >>John
> > >>www.mikrotik.com
> >
> >
> >--
> >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Trango any good?

2006-03-24 Thread chris cooper
Ouch.  Does this also apply to the Fox 5800 and 5300 units or just the Atlas
Fox series?

Chris Intelliwave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Trango any good?

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15747910
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.0/290 - Release Date: 3/23/2006


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] [Fwd: question from left field...]

2006-03-24 Thread John Scrivner

Attention Maine WISPs,
Here is a message from Lisa in Maine with a tower for rent. Lisa is not 
a member of these lists. Please direct any correspondence offlist as we 
do not all need to read the discussion about renting a tower.

All the best,
Scriv

 Original Message 
Subject:question from left field...
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:21:31 -0800
From:   Lisa Menconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Hi John,

My name is Lisa and I am curious about the world of WISPs. I have NO 
background at all relating to any sort of ISP. I am an accountant, of 
all things! Anyway, I happen to be an accountant for radio broadcasting 
and we are moving one of our FM antennas and may have tower space 
available in Northern Maine. I read an article about WISPs and it seems 
that the rural area where our tower is located could likely benefit 
dramatically from WISP technology. How would I go about finding a 
potential Lessee in need of tower space for his/her WISP in Northern New 
England?


I understand that you are probably a very busy man who is not in the 
business of spoon feeding someone WISP information—especially someone 
you don’t even know. If you happen to know who or where I might ask 
about WISPs in Northern New England as to who may be looking for tower 
space, I would greatly appreciate it. I have no idea how to pursue this 
avenue as I have never explored it before.


Any time you could spare to guide me in some direction would be much 
obliged.


Sincerely,

Lisa Menconi

**Lisa Menconi**

**Menconi Consulting**

(530) 887-9090

(530) 887-9040 fax

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless

2006-03-24 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
If ONLY someone would build my roaming wifi cpe!  It'll be THE next big 
thing.


Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Muni wireless


Munis are just your hometown wanting service just like residents, business 
and education. As soon as we learn this we will all benefit from it 
greatly. Public safety specifically is the killer application of muni 
broadband in my opinion. If we all learn how to sell this to our towns and 
service it correctly we will inevitably win in the end. Backhaul to munis 
who decide to go it alone is also an option. I would bet most if not all 
of them would pay for a service agreement on their networks also. Maybe 
they will pay you to build their network for them?

Scriv


Matt Liotta wrote:

I personally don't much care for Muni wireless as I would rather the 
government stay out of the ISP business. With that being said, Rome, GA 
announced that GTS had won the the contract to install a wireless system 
for the city. See http://muniwireless.com/municipal/bids/1102/ for 
details on the announcement.


What I thought the list might find interesting is that we (AirInfinite, 
now One Ring Networks) were included in GTS's bid and will now be 
providing backhaul for the wireless network. I believe this is an 
interesting approach for WISPs to take when dealing with munis that have 
an interest in wireless.


-Matt


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Sprint Wi-Fi

2006-03-24 Thread Peter R.

By Al Senia
http://www.americasnetwork.com/americasnetwork/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=314704

Municipal Wi-Fi networks are sprouting up around the United States, and 
it’s been independent ISPs such as EarthLink and Google that typically 
have struck deals with cities to provide wireless broadband access in an 
attempt to wrest market share from incumbent service providers.


Now in an example of the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” mentality,” 
Sprint Nextel has entered into a 60-day trial with the Las Vegas suburb 
of Henderson, Nev. to launch a mesh Wi-Fi broadband network. The 
wireless service is primarily aimed at helping city officials and 
emergency responders work more efficiently in the field, although it 
will also be made available to every resident, visitor and business in 
the city of 175,000.


Sprint views the trial as a learning experience. “We are doing this to 
better understand how people use it and to measure network performance,” 
explained one Sprint executive at the TelecomNext trade show, where the 
announcement was made this week. Like other service providers, Sprint is 
studying how to develop a Wi-Fi business model that can actually make a 
profit. (Sprint is covering the network’s cost, but it won’t reveal the 
amount of the investment.) Henderson Mayor James Gibson says police and 
fire personnel, as well as safety inspectors will heavily utilize the 
wireless system.


The trial is being touted as the first municipal Wi-Fi trial of any 
magnitude carried out by a local operator in the US market. The Wi-Fi 
service is actually being operated by Sprint’s local communications 
business, which is expected to separate from the parent company later 
this year and operate under the name Embarq.


What’s interesting about this situation is that Sprint is actually 
competing with itself since it offers PCS and EVDO service in the same 
service footprint. Of course, it’s not at all clear whether the 
Henderson trial will extend beyond the end of May. But if it does, 
Sprint could conceivable lose existing broadband customers to the new 
citywide broadband network. (It could also lose telephone customers to 
VoIP running over the network.)


Of course, Sprint and other incumbent providers face the same problem 
battling the municipal networks in cities across the US. At least in 
Henderson’s case, Sprint can somewhat control the competitive fray, as 
well as lock out other Wi-Fi service providers. For these reasons, if 
this experiment extends beyond its initial date, it could serve as a 
model for incumbent telcos, especially if Sprint ends up with a business 
model that actually works and turns a profit.


(Al Senia is the editor of America’s Network.)

--


Regards,

Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884 
http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Sprint Wi-Fi

2006-03-24 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

don't these authors ever do any independent non spoon fed research?

deep sigh

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:59 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Sprint Wi-Fi



By Al Senia
http://www.americasnetwork.com/americasnetwork/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=314704

Municipal Wi-Fi networks are sprouting up around the United States, and it’s 
been independent ISPs such as EarthLink and Google that typically have 
struck deals with cities to provide wireless broadband access in an 
attempt to wrest market share from incumbent service providers.


Now in an example of the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” mentality,” 
Sprint Nextel has entered into a 60-day trial with the Las Vegas suburb of 
Henderson, Nev. to launch a mesh Wi-Fi broadband network. The wireless 
service is primarily aimed at helping city officials and emergency 
responders work more efficiently in the field, although it will also be 
made available to every resident, visitor and business in the city of 
175,000.


Sprint views the trial as a learning experience. “We are doing this to 
better understand how people use it and to measure network performance,” 
explained one Sprint executive at the TelecomNext trade show, where the 
announcement was made this week. Like other service providers, Sprint is 
studying how to develop a Wi-Fi business model that can actually make a 
profit. (Sprint is covering the network’s cost, but it won’t reveal the 
amount of the investment.) Henderson Mayor James Gibson says police and 
fire personnel, as well as safety inspectors will heavily utilize the 
wireless system.


The trial is being touted as the first municipal Wi-Fi trial of any 
magnitude carried out by a local operator in the US market. The Wi-Fi 
service is actually being operated by Sprint’s local communications 
business, which is expected to separate from the parent company later this 
year and operate under the name Embarq.


What’s interesting about this situation is that Sprint is actually 
competing with itself since it offers PCS and EVDO service in the same 
service footprint. Of course, it’s not at all clear whether the Henderson 
trial will extend beyond the end of May. But if it does, Sprint could 
conceivable lose existing broadband customers to the new citywide 
broadband network. (It could also lose telephone customers to VoIP running 
over the network.)


Of course, Sprint and other incumbent providers face the same problem 
battling the municipal networks in cities across the US. At least in 
Henderson’s case, Sprint can somewhat control the competitive fray, as 
well as lock out other Wi-Fi service providers. For these reasons, if this 
experiment extends beyond its initial date, it could serve as a model for 
incumbent telcos, especially if Sprint ends up with a business model that 
actually works and turns a profit.


(Al Senia is the editor of America’s Network.)

--


Regards,

Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884 http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango any good?

2006-03-24 Thread Tom DeReggi
What's inside the box doesn't matter, if it does the job in real world 
trials.


There's not a radio on the market today that can out peform it (the M5580) 
at anywhere near that low a price point.


I don't like terms like good, bad, best, etc.

What Trango provides is value, and a working business model.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "chris cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:20 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Trango any good?


Ouch.  Does this also apply to the Fox 5800 and 5300 units or just the 
Atlas

Fox series?

Chris Intelliwave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Trango any good?

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15747910
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.0/290 - Release Date: 3/23/2006


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Sprint Wi-Fi

2006-03-24 Thread Jack Unger
Sadly, some "writers" don't even know how to have an independent 
thought, much less do independent research - just look at what the 
convential media "feeds" us every day.  Besides, if a "writer" doesn't 
kiss the bosses ass, they won't have a job.


This article really isn't too bad and it reminds us again that the 
incumbent telcos are a huge and constant threat to the survival of 
independent ISPs and WISPs. It also reminds us that WISPs who ignore the 
Muni Wi-Fi market do so at their own peril.



Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:


don't these authors ever do any independent non spoon fed research?

deep sigh

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:59 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Sprint Wi-Fi



By Al Senia
http://www.americasnetwork.com/americasnetwork/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=314704 



Municipal Wi-Fi networks are sprouting up around the United States, 
and it’s been independent ISPs such as EarthLink and Google that 
typically have struck deals with cities to provide wireless broadband 
access in an attempt to wrest market share from incumbent service 
providers.


Now in an example of the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” mentality,” 
Sprint Nextel has entered into a 60-day trial with the Las Vegas 
suburb of Henderson, Nev. to launch a mesh Wi-Fi broadband network. 
The wireless service is primarily aimed at helping city officials and 
emergency responders work more efficiently in the field, although it 
will also be made available to every resident, visitor and business in 
the city of 175,000.


Sprint views the trial as a learning experience. “We are doing this to 
better understand how people use it and to measure network 
performance,” explained one Sprint executive at the TelecomNext trade 
show, where the announcement was made this week. Like other service 
providers, Sprint is studying how to develop a Wi-Fi business model 
that can actually make a profit. (Sprint is covering the network’s 
cost, but it won’t reveal the amount of the investment.) Henderson 
Mayor James Gibson says police and fire personnel, as well as safety 
inspectors will heavily utilize the wireless system.


The trial is being touted as the first municipal Wi-Fi trial of any 
magnitude carried out by a local operator in the US market. The Wi-Fi 
service is actually being operated by Sprint’s local communications 
business, which is expected to separate from the parent company later 
this year and operate under the name Embarq.


What’s interesting about this situation is that Sprint is actually 
competing with itself since it offers PCS and EVDO service in the same 
service footprint. Of course, it’s not at all clear whether the 
Henderson trial will extend beyond the end of May. But if it does, 
Sprint could conceivable lose existing broadband customers to the new 
citywide broadband network. (It could also lose telephone customers to 
VoIP running over the network.)


Of course, Sprint and other incumbent providers face the same problem 
battling the municipal networks in cities across the US. At least in 
Henderson’s case, Sprint can somewhat control the competitive fray, as 
well as lock out other Wi-Fi service providers. For these reasons, if 
this experiment extends beyond its initial date, it could serve as a 
model for incumbent telcos, especially if Sprint ends up with a 
business model that actually works and turns a profit.


(Al Senia is the editor of America’s Network.)

--


Regards,

Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884 http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/