[WISPA] HELLO is this on?????

[Carl A Jeptha]

Rather quiet, wandering if I have been sidelined.

--
You have a Good Day now,


Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
office 905 349-2084
Emergency only Pager 905 377-6900
skype cajeptha

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] needed -karlnet-isp-base license

[danlist]

I had a tower get by lightning yesterday and I am in desperate need of a
karlnet-isp-base-license for kn105 or ap1000


I will be at the tower site all day, so you can call my office # below if I
don't respond to your email

thanks

Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Systems
www.wbisp.com
781-566-2053 ext 6201
1-888-wbsystem (888) 927-9783
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/381 - Release Date: 07/03/2006
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] needed -karlnet-isp-base license

[Mark Nash]

I don't have a license for those units but I DO have a Karlnet AP available 
that has dual N connectors.
-Original Message-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:05:09 
To:"'WISPA General List'" 
Subject: [WISPA] needed -karlnet-isp-base license

I had a tower get by lightning yesterday and I am in desperate need of a
karlnet-isp-base-license for kn105 or ap1000


I will be at the tower site all day, so you can call my office # below if I
don't respond to your email

thanks

Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Systems
www.wbisp.com
781-566-2053 ext 6201
1-888-wbsystem (888) 927-9783
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/381 - Release Date: 07/03/2006
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] needed -karlnet-isp-base license

[Blair Davis]

Talk to Ken Vassly? at WinnCom Tech.

Mark Nash wrote:

  I don't have a license for those units but I DO have a Karlnet AP available that has dual N connectors.
-Original Message-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:05:09 
To:"'WISPA General List'" 
Subject: [WISPA] needed -karlnet-isp-base license

I had a tower get by lightning yesterday and I am in desperate need of a
karlnet-isp-base-license for kn105 or ap1000


I will be at the tower site all day, so you can call my office # below if I
don't respond to your email

thanks

Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Systems
www.wbisp.com
781-566-2053 ext 6201
1-888-wbsystem (888) 927-9783
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

  
  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/381 - Release Date: 7/3/2006
  




-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program

[Anthony Will]

Im in MN where the city of Chaska has had a large tropos network running for a couple years.  About 80% of in home customers have to purchase a "wireless modem"  (CB3) to get a stable signal in their home.
Anthony WillBroadband Corp.On 7/3/06, Charles Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tom,The WHOLE PURPOSE of a WiFi Mesh Network Strategy is to AVOID THE COST OFTHE CPE & TRUCK ROLLNow -- whether this theory works in practice is a whole nother issue-CharlesP.S. FWIW - personally, I find the the concept (from an ROI perspective) of
a service provider WiFi mesh to be a bit far-fetched, but then again, 10years ago, I told the founder of half.com that you was bonkers, and procededto get into the wireless biz =/
---CWLabTechnology Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] OnBehalf Of Tom DeReggiSent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:03 PMTo: WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program
The primary difference being that in the Canopy Fixed Wireless you areincluding end user CPE. The largest cost to detur take rate when WISPS makesubs pay for it.Its likely that one can assume that many of the subscribers will need to
install outdoor equipment (adding $100-$300 BUCKS), to reliably connect tothe mesh.  So you could easilly add $1.5 million to the mesh cost for CPE,or remove $1.5million from the Fix Wireless plan if you were going to
compare apples to apples.What Mesh still has on its side is mobility.  The question is what valueshould a WISP put on that. Mobility can be easilly be the reason to justifywhy a muni should support a oublic interest project. (cable and DSL go to
the home but NOT mobile for teh community to share.).  Mobilty also allowMuni type applications, such as to support travelling users (commerce), orMobile government work force.  Mesh also gives Muni bargining power in the
deployment, as it uses an asset of value that the governement has to tradeand offer (easements, light poles, and power from them).In a Fixed Wireless deployment it could easilly be argued that tehgivernemnt has little assets of value to the provider. Its usually the
independant property owners tht have the preferred assets for signaldistribution.  For example, in my county, I am allowed free access to cityinfrastructure as a requirement that allowed tower building restrictions to
be passed years ago. But yet I chose to pay for broadcast sites, because tehGovernement do not own the best sites that are advantageous to me.Part of my point is that its not jsut the radios costs that are relevant.
I'm starting to think that the Tropos, use all verticle, use only onechannel all across the network, design may not be to bad an ideas after all.If it solves the challenge to get mobility well, and does not work well for
subs inside their homes, it still allows lots of spectrum for the highquality Fixed Wireless providers.Part of the arguement is that its possible that MESH may be the only way toget mobilty well. And maybe the answer is to deliver it with the least
impact on everyone else.Of course Alvarion mobile products have shown otherwise for vehichle mobilesolutions.So what would happen if more Fixed Wireless manufacturers made Mobile CPEs?Would it get rid of some of teh need of mesh? Sure mesh gives person/laptop
mobility, but will any one really use it?  There is a good arguement that ifusage of hotspots is low in public areas (parks, cafes, etc) it would beeven lower on the streets and such.  There is still very little evidence
that communities will get the MESH signal insidet heir home reliably withoutexternal CPE equipment.Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program>a whole 49 square feet, eh ?  Real hard.  :)Some interesting thoughts for FridayI forget the exact numbers, but Tropos recommends something like 20 APs /
square mile to get 95% coverage at b/g rates49 square miles = 49*20 ~ 960 ApsPart# MTR-52103000-500AA is a 500 pack of HotZone Aps on their price sheetthat goes for about $1.5 million list So that's $3 million in Aps -- for
simplicity -- lets assume that mounting hardware, power taps, etc is equalto the equivalent in discount Then we need to add in the additionalinfrastructure, like backhaul SMs, Routers, Servers, etc and the services
required to install / implement the system...Experience from a similar type deployment (~40 square miles) pegs the entireproject at about $5 million for E,F&IMarket Data:Census information puts Anaheim w/ a population of 328k people (97k
households)Median income for a household is $47kAccording to the March 2006 PEW Internet report -- in 2006, 46% of thepopulation that makes between $30-75k / year h

Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program

[John Scrivner]

Can you tell us how this network is structured? How many Tropos units 
per backhaul radio are used? What platform is used for backhaul? Is it 
5, 2.4 or 900 for backhaul? How is the performance of this network? 
Anything else you can share is appreciated.

Scriv


Anthony Will wrote:

Im in MN where the city of Chaska has had a large tropos network 
running for a couple years.  About 80% of in home customers have to 
purchase a "wireless modem"  (CB3) to get a stable signal in their home.


Anthony Will
Broadband Corp.

On 7/3/06, *Charles Wu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Hi Tom,

The WHOLE PURPOSE of a WiFi Mesh Network Strategy is to AVOID THE
COST OF
THE CPE & TRUCK ROLL

Now -- whether this theory works in practice is a whole nother issue

-Charles

P.S. FWIW - personally, I find the the concept (from an ROI
perspective) of
a service provider WiFi mesh to be a bit far-fetched, but then
again, 10
years ago, I told the founder of half.com  that
you was bonkers, and proceded
to get into the wireless biz =/

---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces
Wholesale Program


The primary difference being that in the Canopy Fixed Wireless you are
including end user CPE. The largest cost to detur take rate when
WISPS make
subs pay for it.

Its likely that one can assume that many of the subscribers will
need to
install outdoor equipment (adding $100-$300 BUCKS), to reliably
connect to
the mesh.  So you could easilly add $1.5 million to the mesh cost
for CPE,
or remove $1.5million from the Fix Wireless plan if you were going to
compare apples to apples.

What Mesh still has on its side is mobility.  The question is what
value
should a WISP put on that. Mobility can be easilly be the reason
to justify
why a muni should support a oublic interest project. (cable and
DSL go to
the home but NOT mobile for teh community to share.).  Mobilty
also allow
Muni type applications, such as to support travelling users
(commerce), or
Mobile government work force.  Mesh also gives Muni bargining
power in the
deployment, as it uses an asset of value that the governement has
to trade
and offer (easements, light poles, and power from them).

In a Fixed Wireless deployment it could easilly be argued that teh
givernemnt has little assets of value to the provider. Its usually
the
independant property owners tht have the preferred assets for signal
distribution.  For example, in my county, I am allowed free access
to city
infrastructure as a requirement that allowed tower building
restrictions to
be passed years ago. But yet I chose to pay for broadcast sites,
because teh

Governement do not own the best sites that are advantageous to me.

Part of my point is that its not jsut the radios costs that are
relevant.

I'm starting to think that the Tropos, use all verticle, use only one
channel all across the network, design may not be to bad an ideas
after all.
If it solves the challenge to get mobility well, and does not work
well for
subs inside their homes, it still allows lots of spectrum for the high
quality Fixed Wireless providers.

Part of the arguement is that its possible that MESH may be the
only way to
get mobilty well. And maybe the answer is to deliver it with the
least
impact on everyone else.

Of course Alvarion mobile products have shown otherwise for
vehichle mobile
solutions.

So what would happen if more Fixed Wireless manufacturers made
Mobile CPEs?
Would it get rid of some of teh need of mesh? Sure mesh gives
person/laptop
mobility, but will any one really use it?  There is a good
arguement that if

usage of hotspots is low in public areas (parks, cafes, etc) it
would be
even lower on the streets and such.  There is still very little
evidence
that communities will get the MESH signal insidet heir home
reliably without

external CPE equipment.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
To: "'WISPA General List'" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces
Wholesale Program


>a whole 49 square feet, eh ?  Real hard.  :)

Some interesting th

RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Progra m

[Patrick Leary]

Earthlink primarily uses Tropos mesh, with about 40-50 nodes per square mile
backhauled with Canopy 5GHz on about a 1:3 (mesh:Canopy) ratio. 

Patrick 

-Original Message-
From: John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program

Can you tell us how this network is structured? How many Tropos units 
per backhaul radio are used? What platform is used for backhaul? Is it 
5, 2.4 or 900 for backhaul? How is the performance of this network? 
Anything else you can share is appreciated.
Scriv


Anthony Will wrote:

> Im in MN where the city of Chaska has had a large tropos network 
> running for a couple years.  About 80% of in home customers have to 
> purchase a "wireless modem"  (CB3) to get a stable signal in their home.
>
> Anthony Will
> Broadband Corp.
>
> On 7/3/06, *Charles Wu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The WHOLE PURPOSE of a WiFi Mesh Network Strategy is to AVOID THE
> COST OF
> THE CPE & TRUCK ROLL
>
> Now -- whether this theory works in practice is a whole nother issue
>
> -Charles
>
> P.S. FWIW - personally, I find the the concept (from an ROI
> perspective) of
> a service provider WiFi mesh to be a bit far-fetched, but then
> again, 10
> years ago, I told the founder of half.com  that
> you was bonkers, and proceded
> to get into the wireless biz =/
>
> ---
> CWLab
> Technology Architects
> http://www.cwlab.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ] On
> Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces
> Wholesale Program
>
>
> The primary difference being that in the Canopy Fixed Wireless you are
> including end user CPE. The largest cost to detur take rate when
> WISPS make
> subs pay for it.
>
> Its likely that one can assume that many of the subscribers will
> need to
> install outdoor equipment (adding $100-$300 BUCKS), to reliably
> connect to
> the mesh.  So you could easilly add $1.5 million to the mesh cost
> for CPE,
> or remove $1.5million from the Fix Wireless plan if you were going to
> compare apples to apples.
>
> What Mesh still has on its side is mobility.  The question is what
> value
> should a WISP put on that. Mobility can be easilly be the reason
> to justify
> why a muni should support a oublic interest project. (cable and
> DSL go to
> the home but NOT mobile for teh community to share.).  Mobilty
> also allow
> Muni type applications, such as to support travelling users
> (commerce), or
> Mobile government work force.  Mesh also gives Muni bargining
> power in the
> deployment, as it uses an asset of value that the governement has
> to trade
> and offer (easements, light poles, and power from them).
>
> In a Fixed Wireless deployment it could easilly be argued that teh
> givernemnt has little assets of value to the provider. Its usually
> the
> independant property owners tht have the preferred assets for signal
> distribution.  For example, in my county, I am allowed free access
> to city
> infrastructure as a requirement that allowed tower building
> restrictions to
> be passed years ago. But yet I chose to pay for broadcast sites,
> because teh
>
> Governement do not own the best sites that are advantageous to me.
>
> Part of my point is that its not jsut the radios costs that are
> relevant.
>
> I'm starting to think that the Tropos, use all verticle, use only one
> channel all across the network, design may not be to bad an ideas
> after all.
> If it solves the challenge to get mobility well, and does not work
> well for
> subs inside their homes, it still allows lots of spectrum for the high
> quality Fixed Wireless providers.
>
> Part of the arguement is that its possible that MESH may be the
> only way to
> get mobilty well. And maybe the answer is to deliver it with the
> least
> impact on everyone else.
>
> Of course Alvarion mobile products have shown otherwise for
> vehichle mobile
> solutions.
>
> So what would happen if more Fixed Wireless manufacturers made
> Mobile CPEs?
> Would it get rid of some of teh need of mesh? Sure mesh gives
> person/laptop
> mobility, but will any one really use it?  There is a good
> arguement that if
>
> usage of hotspots is low in public areas (parks, cafes, etc) it
> would be
> even lower on the streets and such.  There is still very lit

RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Progra m

[Patrick Leary]

Correction. I meant 1 Canopy for every 3 Tropos nodes...

Patrick 

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Leary 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:25 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Progra m

Earthlink primarily uses Tropos mesh, with about 40-50 nodes per square mile
backhauled with Canopy 5GHz on about a 1:3 (mesh:Canopy) ratio. 

Patrick 

-Original Message-
From: John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program

Can you tell us how this network is structured? How many Tropos units 
per backhaul radio are used? What platform is used for backhaul? Is it 
5, 2.4 or 900 for backhaul? How is the performance of this network? 
Anything else you can share is appreciated.
Scriv


Anthony Will wrote:

> Im in MN where the city of Chaska has had a large tropos network 
> running for a couple years.  About 80% of in home customers have to 
> purchase a "wireless modem"  (CB3) to get a stable signal in their home.
>
> Anthony Will
> Broadband Corp.
>
> On 7/3/06, *Charles Wu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The WHOLE PURPOSE of a WiFi Mesh Network Strategy is to AVOID THE
> COST OF
> THE CPE & TRUCK ROLL
>
> Now -- whether this theory works in practice is a whole nother issue
>
> -Charles
>
> P.S. FWIW - personally, I find the the concept (from an ROI
> perspective) of
> a service provider WiFi mesh to be a bit far-fetched, but then
> again, 10
> years ago, I told the founder of half.com  that
> you was bonkers, and proceded
> to get into the wireless biz =/
>
> ---
> CWLab
> Technology Architects
> http://www.cwlab.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ] On
> Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces
> Wholesale Program
>
>
> The primary difference being that in the Canopy Fixed Wireless you are
> including end user CPE. The largest cost to detur take rate when
> WISPS make
> subs pay for it.
>
> Its likely that one can assume that many of the subscribers will
> need to
> install outdoor equipment (adding $100-$300 BUCKS), to reliably
> connect to
> the mesh.  So you could easilly add $1.5 million to the mesh cost
> for CPE,
> or remove $1.5million from the Fix Wireless plan if you were going to
> compare apples to apples.
>
> What Mesh still has on its side is mobility.  The question is what
> value
> should a WISP put on that. Mobility can be easilly be the reason
> to justify
> why a muni should support a oublic interest project. (cable and
> DSL go to
> the home but NOT mobile for teh community to share.).  Mobilty
> also allow
> Muni type applications, such as to support travelling users
> (commerce), or
> Mobile government work force.  Mesh also gives Muni bargining
> power in the
> deployment, as it uses an asset of value that the governement has
> to trade
> and offer (easements, light poles, and power from them).
>
> In a Fixed Wireless deployment it could easilly be argued that teh
> givernemnt has little assets of value to the provider. Its usually
> the
> independant property owners tht have the preferred assets for signal
> distribution.  For example, in my county, I am allowed free access
> to city
> infrastructure as a requirement that allowed tower building
> restrictions to
> be passed years ago. But yet I chose to pay for broadcast sites,
> because teh
>
> Governement do not own the best sites that are advantageous to me.
>
> Part of my point is that its not jsut the radios costs that are
> relevant.
>
> I'm starting to think that the Tropos, use all verticle, use only one
> channel all across the network, design may not be to bad an ideas
> after all.
> If it solves the challenge to get mobility well, and does not work
> well for
> subs inside their homes, it still allows lots of spectrum for the high
> quality Fixed Wireless providers.
>
> Part of the arguement is that its possible that MESH may be the
> only way to
> get mobilty well. And maybe the answer is to deliver it with the
> least
> impact on everyone else.
>
> Of course Alvarion mobile products have shown otherwise for
> vehichle mobile
> solutions.
>
> So what would happen if more Fixed Wireless manufacturers made
> Mobile CPEs?
> Would it get rid of some of teh need of mesh? Sure mesh gives
>   

[WISPA] RB112s

[JohnnyO]

Title: RB112s






Who has stock on these ? 


JohnnyO



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program

[chris cooper]

Sounds like a mighty long ROI..
c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 12:25 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale
Program

Earthlink primarily uses Tropos mesh, with about 40-50 nodes per square
mile
backhauled with Canopy 5GHz on about a 1:3 (mesh:Canopy) ratio. 

Patrick 

-Original Message-
From: John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale
Program

Can you tell us how this network is structured? How many Tropos units 
per backhaul radio are used? What platform is used for backhaul? Is it 
5, 2.4 or 900 for backhaul? How is the performance of this network? 
Anything else you can share is appreciated.
Scriv


Anthony Will wrote:

> Im in MN where the city of Chaska has had a large tropos network 
> running for a couple years.  About 80% of in home customers have to 
> purchase a "wireless modem"  (CB3) to get a stable signal in their
home.
>
> Anthony Will
> Broadband Corp.
>
> On 7/3/06, *Charles Wu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The WHOLE PURPOSE of a WiFi Mesh Network Strategy is to AVOID THE
> COST OF
> THE CPE & TRUCK ROLL
>
> Now -- whether this theory works in practice is a whole nother
issue
>
> -Charles
>
> P.S. FWIW - personally, I find the the concept (from an ROI
> perspective) of
> a service provider WiFi mesh to be a bit far-fetched, but then
> again, 10
> years ago, I told the founder of half.com  that
> you was bonkers, and proceded
> to get into the wireless biz =/
>
> ---
> CWLab
> Technology Architects
> http://www.cwlab.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ] On
> Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces
> Wholesale Program
>
>
> The primary difference being that in the Canopy Fixed Wireless you
are
> including end user CPE. The largest cost to detur take rate when
> WISPS make
> subs pay for it.
>
> Its likely that one can assume that many of the subscribers will
> need to
> install outdoor equipment (adding $100-$300 BUCKS), to reliably
> connect to
> the mesh.  So you could easilly add $1.5 million to the mesh cost
> for CPE,
> or remove $1.5million from the Fix Wireless plan if you were going
to
> compare apples to apples.
>
> What Mesh still has on its side is mobility.  The question is what
> value
> should a WISP put on that. Mobility can be easilly be the reason
> to justify
> why a muni should support a oublic interest project. (cable and
> DSL go to
> the home but NOT mobile for teh community to share.).  Mobilty
> also allow
> Muni type applications, such as to support travelling users
> (commerce), or
> Mobile government work force.  Mesh also gives Muni bargining
> power in the
> deployment, as it uses an asset of value that the governement has
> to trade
> and offer (easements, light poles, and power from them).
>
> In a Fixed Wireless deployment it could easilly be argued that teh
> givernemnt has little assets of value to the provider. Its usually
> the
> independant property owners tht have the preferred assets for
signal
> distribution.  For example, in my county, I am allowed free access
> to city
> infrastructure as a requirement that allowed tower building
> restrictions to
> be passed years ago. But yet I chose to pay for broadcast sites,
> because teh
>
> Governement do not own the best sites that are advantageous to me.
>
> Part of my point is that its not jsut the radios costs that are
> relevant.
>
> I'm starting to think that the Tropos, use all verticle, use only
one
> channel all across the network, design may not be to bad an ideas
> after all.
> If it solves the challenge to get mobility well, and does not work
> well for
> subs inside their homes, it still allows lots of spectrum for the
high
> quality Fixed Wireless providers.
>
> Part of the arguement is that its possible that MESH may be the
> only way to
> get mobilty well. And maybe the answer is to deliver it with the
> least
> impact on everyone else.
>
> Of course Alvarion mobile products have shown otherwise for
> vehichle mobile
> solutions.
>
> So what would happen if more Fixed Wireless manufacturers made
> Mobile CPEs?
> Would it get rid of some of teh need of 

Re: [WISPA] RB112s

[Mark Koskenmaki]

Try this guy

http://www.titanwirelessonline.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=57




North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061
personal correspondence to:  mark at neofast dot net
sales inquiries to:  purchasing at neofast dot net
Fast Internet, NO WIRES!

-
- Original Message - 
From: "JohnnyO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" ;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:22 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RB112s


> Who has stock on these ?
>
> JohnnyO
>






> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

RE: [WISPA] RB112s

[Rick Smith]

yeah, titan's done me well lately. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB112s

Try this guy

http://www.titanwirelessonline.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=57




North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061 personal correspondence to:
mark at neofast dot net sales inquiries to:  purchasing at neofast dot
net Fast Internet, NO WIRES!


-
- Original Message -
From: "JohnnyO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" ;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:22 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RB112s


> Who has stock on these ?
>
> JohnnyO
>







> -- 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Tsunami MP.11 5054-R Bad Ethernet

[Eric Merkel]

We had a storm go thru yesterday and I have a Tsunami MP.11 5054-R
that is now having a problem. The unit powers up and is accessible
from the wireless on the other side without any issue. Unforutnately
though, the ethernet on the unit will not maintain a link to the
router below. The ethernet link is constantly going up and down every
few seconds but it will pass pings when it is up. The unit itself
stays powered up so I don't think the cable is bad. I replaced the PoE
and remade the CAT5 ends to no avail. I tried a different router as
well as reflashing the 5054-R unit's firmware which didn't help
either.

Does anyone know if these can be repaired or is this unit just toast?

This link has a backup connection so I am not under any pressure to
get it fixed immediately and just wondering what my options are.

-Eric
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale Program

[Peter R.]

More than 50 nodes per square mile.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 12:25 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Unwires Anaheim, Announces Wholesale
Program

Earthlink primarily uses Tropos mesh, with about 40-50 nodes per square
mile
backhauled with Canopy 5GHz on about a 1:3 (mesh:Canopy) ratio. 

Patrick 
 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Tsunami MP.11 5054-R Bad Ethernet

[Bob Moldashel]

Proxim will repair it for $335...

-B-





Eric Merkel wrote:

We had a storm go thru yesterday and I have a Tsunami MP.11 5054-R
that is now having a problem. The unit powers up and is accessible
from the wireless on the other side without any issue. Unforutnately
though, the ethernet on the unit will not maintain a link to the
router below. The ethernet link is constantly going up and down every
few seconds but it will pass pings when it is up. The unit itself
stays powered up so I don't think the cable is bad. I replaced the PoE
and remade the CAT5 ends to no avail. I tried a different router as
well as reflashing the 5054-R unit's firmware which didn't help
either.

Does anyone know if these can be repaired or is this unit just toast?

This link has a backup connection so I am not under any pressure to
get it fixed immediately and just wondering what my options are.

-Eric



--
Bob Moldashel
Lakeland Communications, Inc.
Broadband Deployment Group
1350 Lincoln Avenue
Holbrook, New York 11741 USA
800-479-9195 Toll Free US & Canada
631-585-5558 Fax
516-551-1131 Cell

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/