Re: [WISPA] IP based security system

2008-08-04 Thread Eric Albert
I have used the Netbotz appliances before with great success. APC bought them a few years ago. Axis might be another option. Eric Albert Application Engineer Alvarion, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday,

[WISPA] MT telnet

2008-08-04 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, Does anyone know if there is a way to turn off the color features on the newer Mikrotik ROS versions when doing a telnet? It is messing up our remote telnet scripts because the color codes are being sent and the Net::Telnet perl module does not know how to deal with them. thanks, Travis

Re: [WISPA] MT telnet

2008-08-04 Thread D. Ryan Spott
Sigh *no*... http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US07/v3.pdf (page 21) Console: Colors Console consumes less memory, it hasfaster startup and fast export time References to items, commands, prompts and exports are coloured Currently no way to turn colours off, except running under a dumb

Re: [WISPA] IP based security system

2008-08-04 Thread Jon Auer
The best system I've worked with is the Honeywell RapidEye. I've only used it for cameras, but it also does relay input/output for sensors and door locks. Runs $3-$10K depending on the I/O options and storage capacity. http://www.honeywellvideo.com/products/recorders/pc/index.html For stand alone

Re: [WISPA] MT telnet

2008-08-04 Thread Ryan Langseth
Can you set your TERM env variable to something different? I don't have a mikrotik to try it on, but if you set your TERM env variable to vt100 it should not use color Ryan D. Ryan Spott wrote: Sigh *no*... http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US07/v3.pdf (page 21) Console: Colors

[WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Jerry Richardson
Is it possible to get an injunction against a HAM if he moved to a 900MHz frequency as is causing interference that would disrupt our ability to do business? I know he has a license and I don't however there must be some precedent that allows for commercial venture versus amateur radio. Any

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Jerry Richardson
By the way, we have been up there for 4 years - this HAM only recently increased the power in the last three weeks. __ Jerry Richardson airCloud Communications From: Jerry Richardson Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:45 PM

[WISPA] Service in LA

2008-08-04 Thread Dustin Jurman
Looking for service in LA, near the home depot center. If you service this area please email me. Dustin Jurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

[WISPA] 900mhz - Ham

2008-08-04 Thread Lance Jahnke
It's my understanding that as long as the Ham operator is within his operating privileges, any interference with part 15 users or other NON-Licensed user/equipment, there is not much that can be done. I would however bring it to his attention and constructively work on a solution with him.

Re: [WISPA] Service in LA

2008-08-04 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
Louisiana? Los Angeles? Latin America? :-) Dustin Jurman wrote: Looking for service in LA, near the home depot center. If you service this area please email me. Dustin Jurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread lakeland
Jerry You may get an initial injunction but as a Part 15 user you don't have much in the line of rights as far as federal law is concerned unless you can show willful interference from he ham. From a business point of view anything is possible in court Unfortunately amateur radio becomes

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread lakeland
Where are u located Jerry? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Jerry Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:45:17 To: Jerry Richardson[EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Motorola Canopy User

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Jerry Richardson
Since I have no case, a work around is the way to go IMO. I'm not interested in dragging this out. I do have a plan for a work-around and I am confident it will work. It's just a PITA. Thanks for the input __ Jerry Richardson airCloud Communications

Re: [WISPA] 900mhz - Ham

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
Yep, Hams OWN this band. We are simply visitors. - Original Message - From: Lance Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:01 PM Subject: [WISPA] 900mhz - Ham It's my understanding that as long as the Ham operator is within his operating

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
OK, to warm things up, I proffer the following: Ham radio is essential to the emergency communications network of the planet. When all else fails, hams and the American Red Cross can always get business done. At 5.7 GHz, the distance record is 3,982 km. At 903 MHz the distance record is

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Blake Bowers
And the ARC? Spew And amateur radio is dying. Its a fact. The last one left needs to shut off the lights. Just look at the hamfests. (I call them the land of the great unwashed) Numbers are diminishing all the time. Springfield MO just announced they are canceling theirs this year.

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread 3-dB Networks
I got my HAM license about 9 years ago (gee its almost time to renew!) and I have never really used it. My original intent was to use it in a walkie-talkie type of way with my Dad... but besides the its cool I can talk to someone over the radio at this range, I never really saw the purpose... Of

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
OK, to warm things up, I proffer the following: Ham radio is essential to the emergency communications network of the planet. When all else fails, hams and the American Red Cross can always get business done. At 5.7 GHz, the distance record is 3,982 km. At 903 MHz the distance record

Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
Well, I thought a filter might have killed the previous message since I hadn't seen it. Oh well... The original sentiment was the intended one... - Original Message - From: Michael Handiboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread lakeland
I personally worked in the 911 system during 9-11 and I can say that most of the emergency traffic was self generated and duplicate to info that was already exchanged by other means. While I agree that they may have a place during emergencies I say that they should use 2 meters and 440 for

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread lakeland
Last one out turn off the light. LOL That was classic! Tnx Blake Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Blake Bowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:54:01 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction And

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
* Jerry Richardson wrote, On 8/4/2008 3:44 PM: Is it possible to get an injunction against a HAM if he moved to a 900MHz frequency as is causing interference that would disrupt our ability to do business? I know he has a license and I don't however there must be some precedent that allows for

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
KD4RME if you were KA4RME you might have a different perspective. Katrina proves the worth of ham radio. Give me a 20 and 40 meter rig, and I will never ever be out of communication irrespective of where you place me on the planet. NO OTHER communications medium can make that claim. Everyone

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread lakeland
Ok. You can have 20 and 40 meters. Give up the Vhf and Uhf. It goes back to all licenseesuse it or loose it Bob Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:34:03 To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Blake Bowers
Chuck - why would that make a bit of difference? KD versus KA? I never said ham radio is useless, I just said its dying. The homebrew activity is just a shadow of what it used to be. Most of the traffic on any of the bands will put you to sleep. And I would take issue with your claim that no

Re: [WISPA] MT telnet

2008-08-04 Thread Sam Tetherow
You should be able to add +c to the username and it will disable colors, +t will disable terminal detection. So the default username would be admin+ct with its normal password. Be prepared for several other things to break. Things moved around again in version 3. Sam Tetherow

Re: [WISPA] For those that didn't see it....

2008-08-04 Thread John Valenti
Marlon, thanks for that, very helpful. I notice you don't mention half and quarter size channels as another solution. Is that something you've thought about? I just started with 2.4 gear last year (StarOS), so I've generally been using cloaking from the beginning. I think it has helped me

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown
A KA has been a ham longer than a KD. (assuming it is not a vanity call sign) Long time hams have more passion for the subject. But really, I agree with almost everything said. Ham really has been dying for a very long time. I just get bent when some WISPs take the entitlement attitude towards

Re: [WISPA] MT telnet

2008-08-04 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, That fixed our problems. THANKS! Travis Microserv Sam Tetherow wrote: You should be able to add +c to the username and it will disable colors, +t will disable terminal detection. So the default username would be admin+ct with its normal password. Be prepared for several other

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Jack Unger
i n l i n e . . . Chuck McCown - 3 wrote: KD4RME if you were KA4RME you might have a different perspective. Katrina proves the worth of ham radio. Give me a 20 and 40 meter rig, and I will never ever be out of communication irrespective of where you place me on the planet. NO OTHER

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Rick Fletcher, W7RAF
You make some good points, Chuck, but you are wrong about one thing: The amateur ranks have been growing like mad since the archaic CW (Morse Code) requirement was eliminated. Also, hams are still experimenting and innovating like never before as is demonstrated by the tremendous growth of SDR

Re: [WISPA] [WISP] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
First and foremost, talk to him. If you have, what's he said when you explained what his actions are doing to you? marlon - Original Message - From: Jerry Richardson To: WISPA General List ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Motorola Canopy User Group Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:44 PM

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Doug Ratcliffe
But when 802.11 became easy it invited all the people to use it who thought that 10 watt amps were a good idea too. Doesn't the more amateur HAM users invite those who are less experienced to just crank up the power rather than look at the engineering of their systems? Isn't removing a

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
That is good to hear. I was the president of my university ham club many years ago. I let my license expire due to ignorance of the due date. I have never bothered to renew it. I never made extra 'cause I couldn't do one minute of perfect copy @ 20 wpm. I had some mistakes. - Original

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Tom Sharples
Well spoken Jack. If I had not earned my ham ticket almost 40 years ago, and used it as a platform for endless home-brewing, I'd never have started this company. Tom Sharples WA6HAS, ARRL, QCWA Qorvus Systems, Inc. - Original Message - From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA

Re: [WISPA] For those that didn't see it....

2008-08-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Nope. MOST people use full channels so that we have a choice of cpe to use. Smaller channels are also relatively new. Some of us have networks that are nearly a decade old now. grin You are right though, that's one way to help sneak into small empty places in the band. marlon -

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

2008-08-04 Thread Chuck McCown - 3
Ditto. My first transmitter (home built, toilet paper tube for coil form) was a hartley VCO connected to an antenna. Was so unstable that it sounded like wandering fsk. - Original Message - From: Tom Sharples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday,

Re: [WISPA] MT telnet

2008-08-04 Thread Butch Evans
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Sam Tetherow wrote: You should be able to add +c to the username and it will disable colors, +t will disable terminal detection. So the default username would be admin+ct with its normal password. As much as I use the console, I never knew this little gem. GREAT

[WISPA] Was Direct Hit!! .....thanks for all the help!

2008-08-04 Thread John McDowell
As of about 10:30pm tonight, we have both towers up and running. Thanks to Dave Rumore, Mike and Bob from Defacto, CTI, Dave East, and Alliance. We were able to pick up two Redline links from Alliance in Atlanta through DeFacto Wireless and replace them with the bad ones this evening. Everything

Re: [WISPA] Was Direct Hit!! .....thanks for all the help!

2008-08-04 Thread John McDowell
Thanks to Harold from Ligowave and Brian from LMG for the willingness as well! :-) On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:44 PM, John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As of about 10:30pm tonight, we have both towers up and running. Thanks to Dave Rumore, Mike and Bob from Defacto, CTI, Dave East, and