Wasn't it Rick Kunse (not sure spelling of last name the guy with the speed
boat?
I just did the base for a 120ft tower. Concrete, rebar, dirt work ran $8200
could gotten it a little cheaper but that guy was taking way to long on a
different job so went with another company that cost a bit more
I can say for the Tranzeo weather proofing rj45 setup is ok.. I haven't had any
problems with it seeping water. We have been using these for 4 years (note
I am knocking on wood right now) :)
Thomas P Galla
t...@bluegrass.net
BluegrassNet
Voice (502) 589.INET [4638]
Fax 502-315-0581
321
That would have been Rick Kunze. http://www.do-it-yourself-tower.com/
Where is he, anyway? I haven't heard from him in a long itme...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Tom DeReggi
I'll chime in with a few comments:
I admit to having been frustrated by the requirements in the 3.65 GHz
ruling by the ambiguity of the cooperation requirements and for sure
there are no first in rights. However, what I am seeing thus far in
practice is that first movers do enjoy a meaningful
Patrick,
Could you please share the exact information about the FCC rejecting
applications for the same tower? At ISPCon a month ago, there were
several people there that had deployed 3.65 and had even registered on
the same tower as other 3.65 people and the applications went through
just
Hi Travis, I wish I had specifics, but I don't have anything other than
an anecdotal story told to me by Redline when I was at a conference. I
had always been under the impression an operator could register for the
same locations.
Patrick
From:
Patrick,
Respectfully I have been told the exact opposite by a WISP that was going to
do a large 3.65 deployment, except the local teleco registered all of the
high ground in the area preventing them from registering their own sites.
The teleco has no intention of deploying the gear, so now they
Hi,
We are going to need specifics on this... because this is NOT what the
FCC has said would happen nor is it what other people (at ISPCon) have
said.
There is another story of a telco that owns several of the "ground
stations" that prevent others from registering 3.65 in that area... I
I have always assumed multiple operators could register the same site
too. Though I was skeptical (and remain so), Remi was really emphatic
that the same site could not be registered and he mentioned that the
Part 90 rule has some language that prevents multiple registrations.
Like you, I'd need
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/SkyWi-Sues-Qwest-Racketeering-Monopolistic/story.aspx?guid={4118C3E4-CBC0-4B7B-ABA0-9E041B08A68A}
Think they will win?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Not sure how I can prove it... being that I didn't actually go through this
but its what one of our customers told us (and they are not on the list).
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick
This is easy to confirm, just go ahead an register a base on a know site
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
I don't have a license to do it with :-)
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vecima 3.65
George: When I click on the link that you sent I get a Market Watch header,
but a document not found message in the body of the narrative.
FYI...Ron
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:wi...@oregonfast.net]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:42 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
I had the same. I just added } or the rest of the link.
Mike Goicoechea
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ron Harden
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:10 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SkyWi
Ron
Try this one:
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2008/12/09/3844370.htm
I think market watch url might have some session limitations.
George
Ron Harden wrote:
George: When I click on the link that you sent I get a Market Watch header,
but a document not found message in the body of the
What QOS are you using on that conenction? Berst effort?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
I get 10 ms on every packet every time with no loss. I am using Redline with
non-real time polling.
Scriv
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
What QOS are you using on that conenction? Berst effort?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet
We tried them all... best effort, non-polling real time, and polling
real time. All the same latency. We are also using 5ms frame and 1/8
carrier.
Travis
Gino Villarini wrote:
What QOS are you using on that conenction? Berst effort?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless
Are there any RedMax operators out there that have begun to see really high
CRC errors on their sectors? We've got two sectors that have seemingly gone
from very clean to abnormally high CRC errors, effecting calls and slowing
Internet speeds etc?
We have a ticket open with redline support but I
Switch to 1/4 carrier and 10 ms. I bet it clears up.
Scriv
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
We tried them all... best effort, non-polling real time, and polling
real time. All the same latency. We are also using 5ms frame and 1/8
carrier.
Travis
Gino
What code are you on? We're running 2.0.26.FCC
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.comwrote:
I've seen this when there is a bad SU registered. CRC's climb out of
control. I have not seen this on multiple SU's before. It's typically
singled out. Have you rebooted
Bring out your credit card and go get one. Run you a wooping $260 and take you
about 10min to do. ;)
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: 3-dB Networks wi...@3-db.net
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:04:18
To: 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re:
Odd, I swear that was Rick. Oh well...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:44 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
2.1.8.FCCMade on: Sep 4 2008, 14:15:50
Also, we are using AN-100UX's not U's.
-Eric
John McDowell wrote:
What code are you on? We're running 2.0.26.FCC
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.com
mailto:ericm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen this when there
Have you got that file?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.comwrote:
2.1.8.FCCMade on: Sep 4 2008, 14:15:50
Also, we are using AN-100UX's not U's.
-Eric
John McDowell wrote:
What code are you on? We're running 2.0.26.FCC
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at
LOL but why would I... I'm not a WISP so I'll never deploy gear.
Maybe it impresses girls ;-)
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of e...@wisp-router.com
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:12 AM
My understanding is that Rick also did a session, but it was a second one
at a different season of WISPCON, I think.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List
ah. Yeah, I'm not sure if I was at WISPCON 2 or not... 3 may have been my
earliest, actually.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
Sent: Monday, December 15,
I have a license and registered site.
I'm about to find out exactly how the FCC intends to deal with this.
The site owner is a bandwidth provider, and they signed a frequency
coordination agreement with someone else, but I got my license and site
first.
The other' guy is objecting to my using
Yeah that is right. I slept since then. Only one that I could think of was
Rick that had done one but yes Jeremy did one to I think it was at an
earlier WISPCon then Rick. I think Rick did his on WISPCon III.
/ Eje
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Yep, Ricks session was WispCon3
Specialized - Do It Yourself Tower Installations - A Case History - This is
a step by step trials and tribulations of one WISPs experience in erecting
his own, large tower.
Panelists: Rick Kunze
Moderator: Jeremy Kinsey
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
I have 4 tower locations, only one seems to be having issues. Last week,
then today I have a few customers on one tower having slow connection
issues. High ping times from less than 1 ms to 4-500ms with packet loss.
The one complaining customer has a -56 @ client end and -60 @ AP. The
common
The ones that seem to have issues are close and LOS the further ones
seem to be ok.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 3:45 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re:
In my experience water in the connector makes the RSSI drop from mid -60s to
-90s
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:59
Signal levels are stable. Ping times are erratic and Customers complain
of slow internet. PPPoE will not stay connected.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 5:00 PM
To:
its all part of how the Wimax MAC works ...,
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
So did you get your latency down from 30-40ms? I remember you were
having the same problem a few weeks ago with the Redline stuff?
Travis
Gino Villarini wrote:
its all part of how the Wimax MAC works ...,
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel
Multiple CPEs on the same AP?
On 12/15/08, Mark McElvy mmce...@accubak.com wrote:
Signal levels are stable. Ping times are erratic and Customers complain
of slow internet. PPPoE will not stay connected.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
12, all Tranzeo CPQ except one.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 6:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Winter connectivity issues
Multiple CPEs
All of the CPEs on that one AP? Or all of the Tranzeo CPEs on that AP?
On 12/15/08, Mark McElvy mmce...@accubak.com wrote:
12, all Tranzeo CPQ except one.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent:
There are 12 clients total on the AP
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 7:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Winter connectivity issues
All of the CPEs
Tried rebooting the AP and changing channels yet? Do you have the
capability to try a CPE of your own in a good position both near and
far from the tower?
On 12/15/08, Mark McElvy mmce...@accubak.com wrote:
There are 12 clients total on the AP
-Original Message-
From:
I started using Tranzeo for 900MHz a few months back. When they work,
they seem to do pretty well. But I'm having trouble debugging them.
I haven't found a method for the following, maybe I'm missing something?
- login to the client (or even AP) radio, use ping to check
connectivity
I wish someone would beat them in court.
We're trying to beat them in the marketplace:
http://www.oregonfast.net/gofast/Radio/09-17-08%20fire%20your%20phone%20company%20mixed.mp3
George
Ron Harden wrote:
That worked...thx George. This is another example of the Bells flexing
their
Those among many other advanced things are why I am using Mikrotik
over Tranzeo on the software aspect.
Please hear our plea, Tranzeo!
On 12/15/08, John Valenti vale...@lir.msu.edu wrote:
I started using Tranzeo for 900MHz a few months back. When they work,
they seem to do pretty well. But I'm
I'd like to pick up some new nylon web lanyards for tower work but was hoping
to get something other than the common yellow. I think it'd be an extra layer
of safety to have different colored lanyards - if they're all the same color
it's easier to get them mixed up which one you're clipping or
Comments inline:
9. I'm conflicted on this. I'm not sure WISPA is having
any real effect, but I'm not sure they are not. [We believe we had a
major
impact in the TV Whitespaces NPRM and outcome, it has taught us the
importance of strong legal counsel in Washington DC and
On to the CPE: This is one of the worst designs of a CPE that I have
ever seen. The entire unit is made by Tranzeo and looks just like their
normal 2.4 CPE. It has the bar of lights on the top showing Power, LAN,
RSSI, etc. The mounting bracket is the L bracket that bolts to the
back and has
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/reporting/showArticle.jhtml?art
icleID=212500440subSection=News
Thought this article was pretty funny reading... So wanted to share it..
/ Eje
WISPA Wants You!
The wife's in bed and I'm still...responding to message on this listserv =/
-Charles
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:57 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] U.S.
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Got the FCC to agree that a routed group of individual AP's could fall under
the same higher powered 2.4ghz rules as active antennas. Too bad no one
built and certified a system of 8 or 10 ap's with very narrow sectors (how
about 24db grids :-). Did you guys
52 matches
Mail list logo
