The SSH interface was started for StarVX but that bit of code added
MORE than the size of the current image, which is just pushing 1.5 MB.
We will be building a web interface as an option to the GUI. Our
goal is to stay under 2 MB and be able to run on some real tiny
systems.
Lonnie
On 10/10/
George wrote:
>> Anyone picked up one of Valemount's new WAR boards and their modified
>> StarOS distribution for them (StarVX)?
>
> Yeppers, I have a couple of PtP links using the WAR StarVX.
> Using cloaking, 5 and 10MHz channel spacing in 5 gig.
>
> http://www.oregonfast.net/gofast/WAR/10MHz%20
They only thing I haven't opened yet is my set of Orthogon Spectras ... too
expensive ..
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Mo
Anyone picked up one of Valemount's new WAR boards and their modified
StarOS distribution for them (StarVX)?
David Smith
MVN.net
Yeppers, I have a couple of PtP links using the WAR StarVX.
Using cloaking, 5 and 10MHz channel spacing in 5 gig.
http://www.oregonfast.net/gofast/WAR/10MHz%20war
Ahhh you've never cracked one open to see what's inside?
Ask Gino, you have to take everything apart and see what makes it tick.
:)
George
Matt Liotta wrote:
That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax
jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors as
Our test uses large packets and TCP. The problem is that the
bandwidth tester consumes a lot of the CPU, so the solution is to test
between machines on the edges, and thus get the true throughput
without the limitations of CPU speed.
Lots of guys have used desktop machines and found that the actu
I'm running almost the same link at 8 miles although on the rb532 - signal is
about -77 dbm
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:59 PM
> To: Lonnie Nunweiler; WISPA General List
> Subjec
Actually, I also have made the mods in the past. My point is the
manufacturer should make the mods. Maybe they will someday, if they keep
hearing justification spelled out.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Li
Oops...
I'm using 5.3G with 19 dbi antenna, estimating 2 db in cable loss, to meet
legal 30db limit. At a half mile, we calculated it to be -54db, and at 1/4
mile -48.
However, I was reading the power in station server wrong, I was reading the
Ack strength instead of Data strength which were
> I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about
> 300 yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU
> mode. The radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a
> quality of 24/29. All speed enhancement features enable, and
> encryption turned off.
>
>
That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax
jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors as
opposed to N.
-Matt
G.Villarini wrote:
That's a easy mod, I have done it myself... Trango gear has a 2 mcx jacks on
the pcb ...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet
That's a easy mod, I have done it myself... Trango gear has a 2 mcx jacks on
the pcb ...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent
I set up like 10 different IPs (build config) but it's only graphing the
last one.
Aubrey Wells wrote:
I find bits to be more useful simply because we sell packages based
around bits (1.5Mbit, 3Mbit, 10Mbit, etc). Graphing in bits lets me
look at the graphs and quickly determine the amount of
Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If
so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear
guys do with the Canopy 5.7 gear.
-Matt
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about
300 yards away LOS,
The wraps have a limitation, maybe the client does as well.
Turn on the advanced features and it will go more speed.
Buy WAR boads and StarVX and go TWICE as fast or use HALF the channel space.
George
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300
I find bits to be more useful simply because we sell packages based
around bits (1.5Mbit, 3Mbit, 10Mbit, etc). Graphing in bits lets me look
at the graphs and quickly determine the amount of throughput a given
user or link is getting in relation to what I sold them. If it were
graphed in bytes
Ok, so I have got it working. Should I graph bytes or bits?
Brian
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
300 yards with LOS with a signal of -70 dB? That sure seems low. You
either have another system real close or you have severe trouble with
antenna or cabling. A Superpass 21 dB at that range would give you
-40 dB or better signals, assuming proper cabling.
Did you set the distance to a couple o
Change to Motorola Canopy ! ducking !
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:37 PM
To: WISPA Genera
I would imagine that it's the WRAP's CPU which should be visable at the
bottom of the screen. If you disable all connection tracking (option 8 under
the advanced tab) you should get around 20mbps on the speed tests.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300
yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU mode. The
radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a quality of 24/29.
All speed enhancement features enable, and encryption turned off.
Using Stat
21 matches
Mail list logo
