Turn off connection tracking under firewall
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:30 AM
To:
I am not seeing results like this at all, I am using nstream on several PTP
links w/ SR5 cards w/ great success, (polling on) - throughput is awesome and I
have replaced all of my karlnet backhaul links (well not replaced but turned the
karlnet links into backup links), I believe mikrotik is
If you are using 2.9.12, there should be a choice where it says 5ghz
and 5ghz Turbo there should be a choice that says 5ghz 5mhz and
5ghz 10mhz.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
How do you change channel width?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis was to be
performed with a hand-held spectrum analyzer at the height that the
equipment was to be mounted. Our offer was rejected.
However, we were asked to provide the climber for the other party's
analysis.
Their analysis was
What redline antenna was used? A sector a panel ?
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cliff Leboeuf
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:07
Gino,
It was Redline's 2' panel.
- Cliff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:15 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Flawed Spectrum Analysis (I think!)
What redline antenna was
140 are 15 db loss plus 2 for the connectors.. the effective gain on the
antenna would be 11 db ... run your calcs
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.timesmicrowave.com
Go to the online calculator and figure up the losses on your cable. Be sure
to set the freq at 5800 mhz.
I'd not even count the connectors as loss, they are usually in the .1 to .5
range. But for a survey adding 1dB of loss per connector is safe.
As I read this
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]Farmers Wanting full Farm Coverage
Why not use the same essid on all your towers? That works for me.
It'll cause
There was no noise detected b/c there was no signal going into the SPEC-AN ! - This sounds like something you would do Cliff - sure this guy wasn't related to you ?
JohnnyO
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 10:07 -0600, Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
We proposed a spectrum analysis for a client. This analysis
I knew that I PAID my dues for a reason.!
:) I wasnt treated this way before.
I guess I get what I paid forIs there a
money-back policy?
- Cliff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of JohnnyO
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
12:49 PM
To: WISPA
General
Hey all:
I'm getting some odd results here with a PtP 5.8GHz link using MikroTik
that I setup to test with. Let me describe the setup...
The link is 7.9 miles with clear LoS and clear Frenel zone. Each end
has a 27db grid with a 3ft LMR-400 jumper to the MikroTik radio.
Using the link
What pigtails and connectors? Mmcx on the SR5 or u.fl? are these new SR5's or
older sr'5s?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Blair Davis
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz
With 140 ft of LMR-400 at 5.8GHz, the loss is about 15db. With a good
antenna topside, you might get some usable results, but not good
ones
For the RG6, I can't find any loss specs for freq. above 900MHz. At
900MHz, the loss is about 10db for 140 ft. Extrapolating that to
5.8GHz, I
Cliff,
Are you sure the first 140' was RG6? I think that is 75 ohm cable so
that
may be a problem, if it was something else it still might have too much loss
at 5.8 GHz to get any signal to the SA. You may be on to something with the
adapters, if they were just using good quality N-Type
Upgrade to 2.9.12. It has better wireless performance. Chech the mikrotik
forums.
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:07 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
I was/am aware of the mmcx issue and all tests were done with the same
u.fl pigtails on each end. When the radio cards were changed, the same
u.fl pigtails were used. Only the radio cards were changed.
They were the older SR5 cards with the mmcx problem. (proven by
testing!!) The mmcx
Thank you.
Performance is not the issue here. The issue is predicted signal
strength vs measured signal strength. The link works and works well.
Thruput and latency are well within expected ranges. I am just getting
numbers that don't make sense. Like the high power SR5 cards having a
Seems to me there are posts that the MT setting values do not equate to dB. Maybe on P15's MT maillist.
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
-- Original Message
---
From: Blair Davis
That makes sense as an explanation for the CM9 issue. Thanks...
Doesn't explain the low output on the SR5 cards
Scott Reed wrote:
Seems to me there are posts that the MT setting values
do not equate to dB. Maybe on P15's MT maillist.
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
If it help, we got SR5s as soon as they
where available. When I put them in a real world environment on a StarOS/WRAP
set-up I saw no increase in signal quality on either end. Put the CM9s back in
and still no change.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
when they new improved Sr5 (the ones w/ the updated
MMCXs) I noticed a few changes in the way mikrotik behaves with them, I also
seem about a 6dbm improvement in those links as well
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent:
Under advanced status the OLDER (the original sr5
cards) report 15dbm TX Power, while the new cards report 19dbm TX Power
Also the CHIP INFO under General is different
between the original sr5 cards and the newer SR5 cards (eeprom info)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another thought is maybe it was alvarion gear or some thing similar that
uses a frequency converter at the antenna.
I think they get fed with a small cable.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Redline itself, does not have spectrum analasys capability, from what I
understood.
Generally Redline user can use it to see if their radio can work well on a
channel, by looking for loss, and what channel worksbest. but the fact that
the Redline smashes through 5.8G fine does not mean that
What exactly is the old mmcx problem? I had some
original batch Range2's (or is that range 3s, the 2,4Ghz G ones)that were
giving me sparatic performance at a site, used with RfLink Amps, and the mmcx
port.
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
-
26 matches
Mail list logo
