I am not seeing results like this at all, I am using nstream on several PTP
links w/ SR5 cards w/ great success, (polling on) - throughput is awesome and I
have replaced all of my karlnet backhaul links (well not replaced but turned the
karlnet links into backup links), I believe mikrotik is definitely the next
wave, so much that I have started offering complete AP/CPE solution kits through
my web store @ http://store.wbisp.com/ (site just went up last night so its
under construction)

Mikrotik is really bringing a great product to the market and w/ the coming sr9
cards there will be a lot of options on the table for the WISP's


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:29 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
> 
> This problem was solved thanks to prompt tech support from Wisp-Router.
> 
> With NStreme enabled, it is necessary to assign the IP to the Bridged port,
> not ether1.
> However, without Nstreme enabled, it works fine with IP assigned to Ether1,
> as long as bridged to WLAN.
> (The same way that always worked with Star OS)
> 
> There were also a couple odd things related to what order setting were
> checked converting from one config to another, that kept Nstreme from
> working, which we were able to replicate after the fact (after tech
> support), to prove we weren't crazy.  Unfortuneately, I can't remember now,
> what exactly the sequence was, 5 hours later. For example, there were times
> when we enabled Nstreme correctly , and it just wouldn't connect. But we
> then disabled it, got WDS to talk again, and then re-enabled it
> successfully. It may have had something todo with one side of the link being
> completely configured before the other. Because if both aren't on Nstreme
> they dont talk at the radio level. So the rule was when a configuration
> didn't talk, disble NStreme, make it talk, then re-enable, and it would
> work.
> 
> What I do like about Mikrotik, is that its all there infront of you, all the
> tools, all the features, as needed. Its pretty well laid out, once you get
> the hang of it.
> 
> Probably the biggest feature I saw missing, was it didn't support diversity
> mode on the Wireless driver.  It was A or B or Full Duplex. But not
> diversity.
> 
> One of the nice things about Star-OS was that it supported diversity mode,
> but also it was less critical to configuration errors.
> 
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
> 
> 
> > Thats exactly what we are trying to do, but its not working, using version
> > 9.12.
> >
> > If I try ping radios....
> >
> > When sniffing, the station sees traffic comming in, but the AP-bridge,
> > sees no traffic comming in.
> >
> > I correctly have put both interfaces Ether1 and WDS1 to the same bridge1.
> > Won't pass traffic the second Nstreme gets selected.
> >
> > The IP is assigned to the ether1 port on each of the sides.
> >
> > I have the same problem trying to do it without WDS and straight WLAN1. I
> > can;t pass traffic the second Nstreme gets selected.
> >
> > Tom DeReggi
> > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "JNA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 12:32 AM
> > Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik Bridging w-Nstreme
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> However, it appears their may be is a flaw in config options, in the
> >>> sense
> >>> that there is no way to get NStreme to work in PTMP modes as a True
> >>> bridge,
> >>> as that would require WDS-AP and WDS-Slave which is not a supported
> >>> config.
> >>> Am I correct on this? Or when NStreme is used, can I safely use WDS-
> >>> station,
> >>> and be a true bridge?
> >>
> >> Tom,
> >>
> >> We are doing this. We have the base set to ap bridge, with dynamic wds
> >> enabled using nstream and polling. Backhaul on the towers using wds
> >> station
> >> WDS with dynamic wds enabled using nstream and polling. We then have an
> >> omni
> >> off the routerboard and the Ethernet connected to a trango 900 base via
> >> cross over. It is working as a full bridge and our clients get dhcp from
> >> the
> >> gateway server at the other end with no problem. I think this is what you
> >> are looking at doing and If so it is working for us.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> --
> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> > --
> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/253 - Release Date: 02/07/2006
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/253 - Release Date: 02/07/2006
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to