On Jun 23, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Many on this list like to just make things up as opposed to
getting an actual legal opinion from a practicing attorney that
specializes in this field.
I'm not aware of that going on much at all on this list, its just
not true.
Do you
Your agree with Larsen for what reason?
Did you know that currently five states require PBXs of all varieties
to support E911? In fact, only three states specifically state that
PBX vendors are not required to support E911. That leaves forty-two
states in a legal grey area. Of course, the
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Matt Liotta wrote:
Your agree with Larsen for what reason?
Did you know that currently five states require PBXs of all
varieties to support E911? In fact, only three states specifically
state that PBX vendors
If you look at what Matt Larsen posted, you will see that
I called Cantwell's office and talked to Michael Baum. He's her staff guy
on the telecom issues.
I was told that the TV white spaces issue is off the table and won't be
messed with (that's a good thing for us).
There's an amendment to auction the white spaces instead, that won't pass.
The
