Hi,
I am looking for a tower logo in a format that can be used for signage
on my service van and lawnsigns. Any free stuff about.
--
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
--
WISPA Wireless List:
Carl A jeptha wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a tower logo in a format that can be used for signage
on my service van and lawnsigns. Any free stuff about.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wireless_tower.svg
It's a scalable vector image so you should be able to easily blow it up
to van-size.
http://news.com.com/Web+2.0+madness+grips+China/2100-1032_3-6189238.html?tag=st.prev
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
Getting closer to a 3650 reality!
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/
I thought America was running behind the rest of the world in broadband!
And I thought most of Asia was wired with ftth and the latest in wireless
technologies!
What gives?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting
Only FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein added comments to the 3650 band
Memorandum Opinion and Order published today.
He said:
___
*A little over two years ago, I was very pleased to support the
Commission’s
Very interesting clarifications that will be immediately beneficial to
WISPs and others looking to deploy in the band. The big wild card and
open question in my view is the cooperation requirement. The Commission
extensively uses the language about being required to cooperate, but
does not fully
Marlon,
Please explain how the information on this website contradicts either of
those 2 thoughts.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/
I thought America was running behind the rest of the world in broadband!
And I thought
I wondering that myself.. thought I might have missed a post somewhere.
On 6/7/07, Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marlon,
Please explain how the information on this website contradicts either of
those 2 thoughts.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on a couple of projects and I'm having trouble finding the size
of the *potential* market covered by the wisp industry.
This info will not specifically go out to anyone else. Nothing will tie
your name/company to your zip codes. I'm just after the zip codes that you
I would hope any WISP worth serious about its being a business (versus a
hobby) should be at least roughly familiar with the issue and the fact
that a decision was being re-evaluated.
At my read, it looks like ALL listen-before-talk type BWA products will
be certifiable under the rule for use in
Amen.. me rejoicing
On 6/7/07, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would hope any WISP worth serious about its being a business (versus a
hobby) should be at least roughly familiar with the issue and the fact
that a decision was being re-evaluated.
At my read, it looks like ALL
43725..
Zack Kneisley
CTO/Chief Network Engineer
Giga-Data LLC
Office: 740.432.3130
Cell:740.255.6253
-
http://www.firewireinternet.com
Your one stop shop for Blazing Broadband Internet
DSL, Wireless, Dialup, Webhosting,
onlist.. offlist, you can look up my address either way :-)
On 6/7/07, Zack Kneisley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
43725..
Zack Kneisley
CTO/Chief Network Engineer
Giga-Data LLC
Office: 740.432.3130
Cell:740.255.6253
-
The USA show's the fastest, most reliable connections!
I guess that must be because no one here uses the internet! (eye roll)
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)
We all know the FCC's zipcode-based accounting of broadband availability
grossly overestimates the reality of the matter. Why not request and track
the the number of households served in each zipcode?
On 6/7/07, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm working on
Fastest and most reliable does not equate to broadband penetration which his
where the US is lagging. I think that is Dawn's point.
Rick Harnish
President
Supernova Technologies, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISPA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Rick Harnish wrote:
Fastest and most reliable does not equate to broadband penetration which his
where the US is lagging.
I can tell you, my penetration is not lagging!
woo hoo
I'm on my 4th install today.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://telephonyonline.com/access/news/broadband_subscribers_instat_053007/
Broadband subscriber base to double by 2011
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
As I read it, the FCC says that contention-based protocols that are
capable of detecting signals that are using *both* *similar* and
*non-similar* protocols (and thereby deferring transmission to avoid
generating interference) can be legally used over the entire 50 MHz band
but protocols
We want the potential market, not the current one.
And, there's only so many hours in the day. Can't get too complicated.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL
My point is, it's the best network out there. And far more people have
access to it than the stats seem to suggest. Still they don't use it.
To me, that means that we have better things to do with our lives than sit
on our asses in front of the computer!
grin
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408)
Get back to work!!!
Slacker
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message
Jack,
My read is 100% the same: any system with a protocol that can sense AND
try to avoid other resident systems, like or dissimilar in protocol,
will be allowed to operate across the entire band.
WiMAX, scheduled Canopy, and any other system that can be synchronized
-- i.e. automatically
Patrick,
How soon after the RO comes out can we expect to see Alvarion branded
product ready to ship that can be registered and used in the 3650 band?
What will it cost? Will it be WiMAX or contention based? I think I would
like to be one of the first in line to register a link. I call
Hi John,
Well, remember that as far as the FCC is concerned, WiMAX IS
contention-based. Keep in mind they are not using a Wi-Fi definition;
their definition is broader, but puts contention products in two
possible camps: restricted and unrestricted.
Unrestricted to them are contention protocols
*More Speed*
. Unmatched price-performance
. Net throughput up to 72 Mbps or above
. Fast, easy installation
*More Power*
. Extensive QoS functionality including application
prioritization
. Up to 40,000 packets per second (PPS)
. Hardware-based advanced encryption system(AES);
Now, as to your main question about Alvarion...let's just say things are
moving. BreezeMAX, the .16e TDD version has now been commercially
shipping inside the U.S. for a few months so it is a real option.
BreezeACCESS VL is also a real option.
So...VL has a 3650 version ready to go right
So for those out there who used 3650 experimental licenses - did NLOS work?
Does the higher output power penetrate foliage? Does urban NLOS work?
I'd like to see if this is a viable option. I'm still worried (and one of
my submitted comments) that being 52 miles from 3 satellite earth stations,
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
The USA show's the fastest, most reliable connections!
I guess that must be because no one here uses the internet! (eye roll)
Europe mainly email and text.
US - porn, research, work, porn, mp3's, p2p - those with bb really eat it up -
ask the MPAA
30 matches
Mail list logo
