http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/26/Comcast-FCC-Hearing-Strategy
--
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the Cisco Press Book - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
Vendor-Neutral Wireless Training-Design-Tro
Can you pick out the real Marlon in this group?
http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-us&fg=rss&vid=5a9774b2-6d6b-47d4-ad23-c7234cfa8
4eb&from=im_m_35-49
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1299 - Release Date: 2/26/2008
9:
allrfcables.com (Shireen)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:48 PM
Subject: [WISPA] outdoor CAT5
> Any good, affordable so
Someone on this list (I think) mentioned www.skywalker.com
I can't vouch for the quality since I haven't ordered, but I think it
was $75 / 1000' box. If I recall, a $500 order was shipped free, too.
If you buy some, let us know how it compares.
-John
On February 26, at 1:48 PM February 26, Tr
Travis Johnson wrote:
> Any good, affordable sources for outdoor CAT5?
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
>
>
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ---
We get ours from:
http://shireeninc.com/
Very quick on shipping and have had great success with their Outdoor
Cat5 and LMR equivalent products...
-Cameron
Midcoast Internet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, F
Any good, affordable sources for outdoor CAT5?
Travis
Microserv
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless
Ugg, sorry, meant to say, I'm not the network "admin"
George Rogato wrote:
> I'm not the network for my network.
> I do know that what we do is to limit the number of connections. Mike
> our admin has a script that runs, I'm assuming on a bsd box that
> probably handles nat, that closes some of
I'm not the network for my network.
I do know that what we do is to limit the number of connections. Mike
our admin has a script that runs, I'm assuming on a bsd box that
probably handles nat, that closes some of those connections when a limit
is reached. That is why on our network, if you have
> The real problem is the number of connections. One client opening up
> 300-400 connections is going to cause all kinds of problems. Being
> able to limit connections is a pretty important item to be able to
> handle on a wireless network.
The other real problem is if these video on demand se
The real problem is the number of connections. One client opening up
300-400 connections is going to cause all kinds of problems. Being
able to limit connections is a pretty important item to be able to
handle on a wireless network.
Matt Larsen
Vistabeam.com
Mike Hammett wrote:
> and I for
That won't work because some of the P2P programs only are identifiable
when they log on and once they are running it would look like normal
traffic. One program like this is Ares.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
Fro
and I forgot to say what I was initially going to say...
You may need better APs. I have 30+ customers on a single tower with more
than one client running P2P applications (including BitTorrent) and
everything works just fine. That said, my AP is a 4-radio 4-sector AP that
is a PC running Mik
I know it's been said already, but I didn't want to have a one-liner.
They're not saying what you can and can't do, but to publicly say what you
do as to not deceive your customers. It wasn't that Comcast shaped their
traffic, but that they shaped and canceled account without saying what the
p
We've got the following that we just removed from service replaced with
higher bandwidth equipment:
Four (4) pairs of Tsunami 45m full duplex radios
(301-27710-1a1/301-27710-1a2)
One (1) pair Tsunami 100m full duplex radio
Two (2) pairs Alvarion LB; one pair 36m, one pair 72m
No antennas incl
Couldn't agree more...and who better to up sell such customers to the
product they really need than their provider. This equals more $$$. I
don't see this as a bad thing...
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Wolfe
Sent: Tu
Again, as I understand it I don't see this as any different than
selling/offering one product, but delivering another. That is unethical and
should be addressed.
If you want to limit p2p traffic then fine, but it has to be disclosed as
George has described earlier in this thread.
Best,
Brad
Kurt, You can always do what we have since 2003, BAN all P2P traffic on
the network. It is listed right in the first paragraph in our TOS and
each customer is told upfront about it. I have turned off radios and I
have even pulled radios because of it. I guess the most important issue
is telling
With the encrypted stuff, that's really hard to do...even if it were a good
idea.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:38 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Uh-Oh," they ar
Don't do that...
create rule all-ptp = shape at 20kbps.
That way they can't say it's being denied :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:38 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] U
20 matches
Mail list logo
