Tom Sharples wrote:
> It's a flavor of Slack Linux. Don't have Python on these boxes so am
> writing a bash script to do essentially the same thing as DenyHosts.
Here's an idea that might work too, assuming you have iptables on that box
http://www.e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de/~tnagel/ipt_recent/
Tom Sharples wrote:
> It's a flavor of Slack Linux. Don't have Python on these boxes so am
> writing a bash script to do essentially the same thing as DenyHosts.
You run iptables on this box? You might have some options there, as well.
-
Jack Unger wrote:
> I respectfully suggest you hire an expert to address this problem.
That's the most polite way I've been told that my idea for a solution sucks!
I suppose that until I find an expert, Google is my friend. :)
It's a flavor of Slack Linux. Don't have Python on these boxes so am writing
a bash script to do essentially the same thing as DenyHosts.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio"
To: "Tom Sharples" ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cru
Tom Sharples wrote:
> Spotted this a few minutes ago on one of our back-end servers. Didn't work,
> but worth noting.
Which OS are you running?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Rog,
I respectfully suggest you hire an expert to address this problem.
jack
Rogelio wrote:
> I've got an interesting interference problem in a marine area, and I was
> hoping to get some feedback on it.
>
> Every week or so, something evil on 2.4 GHz comes through and
> drastically raises th
I think I had to disable the helper to get it to work.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Scott Reed"
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:08 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FTP Problems
Maybe an S band radar is the source of the interference/noise? Check
out the frequency here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_band
Typically only larger ships have S band radar (it sees through rain
better).
Why not put the subs on 5.8ghz?
Greg
On May 1, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Rogelio wrote:
> I've
I do it on my core router and block their ip access to any service on my entire
network and not just ssh on the linux box itself but any other possible attack
vector they might throw on any system with public ip. Don't think that they
will only attack and test ssh ports.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBe
Those attacks been going on for years now. I create on our core router long
time back that will detect successive new ssh connections and block the source
ip for 30minutes. Works very well.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "Tom Sharples"
Date: Fri, 1 Ma
This works too :-)
iptables -A INPUT -s 213.165.154.53/24 -j DROP
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "Tom Sharples" ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Crude dictionary attack via ssh
> Install DenyHosts and those go away
Josh Luthman wrote:
> Install DenyHosts and those go away.
ditto
http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/
http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/faq.html
http://www.howtoforge.com/preventing_ssh_dictionary_attacks_with_denyhosts
"DenyHosts is a script intended to be run by Linux system administrators
to hel
Install DenyHosts and those go away.
On 5/1/09, Tom Sharples wrote:
> Spotted this a few minutes ago on one of our back-end servers. Didn't work,
> but worth noting.
>
> Tom S.
>
> May 2 01:05:12 QORVUS1 sshd[21728]: Illegal user lieu from 213.165.154.53
> May 2 01:05:13 QORVUS1 sshd[21730]: Il
Spotted this a few minutes ago on one of our back-end servers. Didn't work, but
worth noting.
Tom S.
May 2 01:05:12 QORVUS1 sshd[21728]: Illegal user lieu from 213.165.154.53
May 2 01:05:13 QORVUS1 sshd[21730]: Illegal user lilly from 213.165.154.53
May 2 01:05:15 QORVUS1 sshd[21739]: Illegal
I've got an interesting interference problem in a marine area, and I was
hoping to get some feedback on it.
Every week or so, something evil on 2.4 GHz comes through and
drastically raises the noise floor for about a day (an analysis showed
me like -50 dBm), thus knocking off everyone in the bo
1 NAT at our border.
Yes, all routers have FTP Service Port enabled.
Josh Luthman wrote:
> How many layers of nat?
>
> Do you have the service ports enabled in the firewalls?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> "When you
I would try to switch to/from passive ftp
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:08 P
Hi All,
This note was sent out to our customer base, but it the bug affects everyone
that uses Quagga.
A bug in Quagga 0.99.10 and Quagga 0.99.11 was recently discovered with
32-bit ASN support that leads to an assertion failure crash in bgpd when
ASNs larger than 100,000 are received. If you a
How many layers of nat?
Do you have the service ports enabled in the firewalls?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Cona
We run Nstreme on all of our backhauls (over 60 of them) without a
problem. I can easily move 30Mbps across RB532 boards using 20mhz
channel size.
Travis
Microserv
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
3.15 - No wireless test
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavel
3.15 - No wireless test
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subje
I had a customer call this morning. He is trying to FTP a 30Meg file to
an off-network site. It will do between 3 and 99% and then quit.
He is using FileZilla
His PC is directly connected to the CPE, an MT411.
All routers between the CPE and the Internet are MT.
What could be causing this?
I kno
What version of routeros are you running on the backhauls, and are you
using the wireless-test package?
Randy
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
> the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and is
> now
I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and is
now hanging around 10-15% consistent. Pings times are much better going
through this now. 2-3ms.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH
Chris,
The 700 mhz licenses were sold during the Jan/Feb 2008 auction. The size is
based on the CMA geographics that were purchased. I am providing the link
to the map. http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/maps/CMA.pdf.
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
-Original Message-
From: wireless-bou
Tracy, stop teasing and just tell us the highlights about this unit. People
have asked so it's ok to tell on list
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Tracy Tippett"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nifty Outdoor Switch..
> The LPS1000 is patented techno
The LPS1000 is patented technology for Inscape Data and it does include some
very useful features including individual port addressability and multi
simultaneous voltage capabilities- kind cool
Tracy Tippett
--Original Mail--
From: "Marlon K. Schafer"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: T
I have details on the LPS1000 and would be happy to share, contact off list
Tracy
--Original Mail--
From: "Blair Davis"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:40:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nifty Outdoor Switch..
How large a geographic area is granted under a single 700 mhz license?
The area in question is a non-metro market if that makes any difference.
Thanks
Chris Cooper
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wis
It has an adaptive mode which does both.
Mark
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 2:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WAN HotSpot and Polarity
Dual polarity as in you are horizo
A hotspot doesn't require wireless, you could have a wired hotspot. A
hotspot is the management system enabling said access.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "3-dB Networks"
Sent: Friday, May 01
On Fri, May 1, 2009 7:56 am, 3-dB Networks wrote:
> Not at all. I have the controller and access points picked out, just need
> the radius server for the CC processing and authentication for the
> controller to talk to.
I'm still a bit confused, I guess - RADIUS doesn't have anything to do
with c
Not at all. I have the controller and access points picked out, just need
the radius server for the CC processing and authentication for the
controller to talk to.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wirele
On Thu, April 30, 2009 4:31 pm, 3-dB Networks wrote:
> Anyone have any recommendations for a free Radius server? Specifically
> interested in credit card processing for a hotspot application.
Based on a re-reading of this (and the responses others are providing), I
take it you're really looking f
34 matches
Mail list logo
