Which 3.65 vendor are you using?
On 06/30/2010 12:25 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
I have 900 MHz 5.8 ghz and 3.65 wimax all deployed. I sell voice and data
packaged together to businesses only in a location with a lot of
interference. Wimax is by no means a fix to every situation, but my goal
Axxcelera.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 1, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net wrote:
Which 3.65 vendor are you using?
On 06/30/2010 12:25 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
I have 900 MHz 5.8 ghz and 3.65 wimax all deployed. I sell voice and data
packaged together to
I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole 4G thing and found this
interesting
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
Almost everyone I know is betting (and betting big!) on LTE. The only
ones I know holding out on WiMAX 2 are niche
Depends on the bet you are making. WiMAX as a personal broadband
mobility technology in name and ideal is not going to happen. That was
made conclusive some time ago. There will be no device ecosystem, etc.
However, LTE as a technology is very much WiMAX-like, even using many of
the same
At 7/1/2010 09:17 AM, Rogello wrote:
I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole 4G thing and found this
interesting
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
Almost everyone I know is betting (and betting big!) on LTE. The only
ones I know
It should be noted that LTE wouldn't be as good or early available
without mobile WiMAX.
Even if the final outcome is not the network nirvana, it's a lot
better than what was planned by the powerful forces.
Comparing technology only, I think 802.16e failed to achieve a good
PAPR
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units because of their business relationships
with the Outdoor
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 20:04, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote:
And whether they bother to power them up and test them prior to shipping
(which I do..every one)
Here's a sorta-related question (which probably should be on the
Mikrotik-Users list, but whatevs) - what's the
Don't forget that the 750 uses ether1 as a wan and protects it as such
(turns off cdp, etc).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston
Is this the way this business is gonna go?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/01/finland.broadband/index.html?eref=igoogle_cnn
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some of it for some
Fortune 100 companies.
The advice is, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do
not always know it is broken.
Keeping things all at 1 or 2 versions simplifies
What about the adage about staying one major version behind whatever is
current? Does that only apply to Linux kernels?
Greg
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have been systems and networking since about 1980. Some of it for some
Fortune 100 companies.
The advice is, if it
Everything I see about all this all seems negative. Perhaps we should
be happy that more customers are coming our direction?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue
Tis okay. M-TV was a legal right back in the 80's..
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] First nation makes broadband access a
The line between major and minor versions is pretty blurred on mikrotik.
Imagine if you waited until 4.0 to upgrade to 3.x. You would have been
waiting a long time.
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
From: Greg Ihnen
You gotta FIGHT for your RIGHT to SURRR-RF!
Seriously, who knows what tax breaks and subsidies the Government is offering
or if it's a new stipulation in order to operate.
As a Independent operators there is no chance that the government is going to
dictate what speed and what prices we
There is a lot of benefits that a rural telco gets. What's to say
rural ISPs don't get the same pros (and yes, cons)?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
It's not a fair comparison. Some people (is this especially an American
disease?) treat everything as a one-on-one death match, and in this case act
as if there were a WiMAX Corp. duking it out with LTE Corp. for
At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units because of their business
If only we were so lucky...
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:24 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik question
I tend to
At 7/1/2010 12:45 PM, Rogello wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
It's not a fair comparison. Some people (is this especially an American
disease?) treat everything as a one-on-one death match, and in
this case act
as if there were a WiMAX
Xg's product is stated to allow small operators to offer a cellular like
service, using the 900 spectrum.They say they can deal with crowded
spectrum, and it's designed for low density population.
What it amounts to is an IP mobile network, using portable VOIP phones.
It is interesting,
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 09:54 -0500, David E. Smith wrote:
what's the recommendation for versions
and upgrades?
If you are using wireless:
4.10 for NEW deployments, ESPECIALLY if you are using nstreme.
For existing deployments, if you are doing ptmp and NO nstreme, then any
version that is
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do
not always know it is broken.
This is my second biggest complaint about Mikrotik. Their changelogs
really SUCK! The first biggest complaint is not fit for a public
Anybody with a screwdriver and a Motorola PMP320 AP will find a DesignArt 2400
chipset under the hood of a $3500 BaseStation that is 802.16e mobile WiMAX
which does 2x2 MIMO. The same chipset also powers a 6x6 MIMO PureWave BTS @
3.65 GHz.
Quick question for you guys...
When your upgrading from old version to a new version:
IE. I've got an old x86 2.9 which I'm going to replace with a RB1100 on
4.10
(I'm with Rob in that if it isn't broke, I'm not touching it.)
Do you usually export the config and paste in the new router?
Or can
Really? Honestly, there have been times when I would open up a box at an AP
and see the 433 board and say to myself, Man, I forgot that thing was in
here!
For me they have been solid as a rock. But I've been going all UBNT for the
most part the past year because I needed more chaos in my life.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 13:20, Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
Quick question for you guys...
When your upgrading from old version to a new version:
IE. I've got an old x86 2.9 which I'm going to replace with a RB1100 on
4.10
(I'm with Rob in that if it isn't broke, I'm not
Faisal Imtiaz
At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units
Since their beam forming is dynamic, I would expect it to work very well
in that environment.
As Ruckus beamforming is based on selecting a receiver instead of
combining the signals, it should indeed deal with ducting but not too
well with multi-path.
No Beam forming is expected from
http://cbs11tv.com/local/att.u.verse.2.1783395.html
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List:
I just received this today but we're not interested.
I thought someone out there might get use of it.
I'd like to get to that country eventually, it's very rural and mostly hills
and valleys. Beautiful place but too much for me to deal with.
Bob-
From: Wireless
Backup/restore only works same versions, same hardware.
Export can be made to work across versions, but the parameter names do
occasionally change. Quite annoying.
Also, if you do not strip out MAC addresses, the import will set the MAC
on your interfaces to be what is in the config. Not
As well as scripts. Never trust a script from one version to another,
especially in the 5.x.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:20 -0400, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
Do you usually export the config and paste in the new router?
Or can I do a backup and restore with that big of a version difference?
It will need to be done via export/paste. Just do small sections at a
time, though, because SOME of
On 7/1/2010 2:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
You do, however, need to know what is in the change logs, because you do
not always know it is broken.
This is my second biggest complaint about Mikrotik. Their changelogs
really SUCK! The
Ah..
I forgot to add the link to the top.
http://ssl.blankweb.com/Hocking%20County%20Broadband%20RFP.pdf
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Say hi to the girls of East St. Luis for me.
says Marco with an evil grin
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I won't knowingly go above 2.9.51 on my RB1xx boards. I finally got
some 4.x boards out there now because that's what they came with. If
the 4.x line is finally stable, maybe I'll raise my bar to that.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/1/2010
4.x has been good to me. Comes with the newer boards...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:39
They used to have x.y.z, but they abandoned that for some reason.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/1/2010 1:52 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff wrote:
On 7/1/2010 2:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:08 -0400, Scott Reed wrote:
You do,
Hi Don,
Yes, the FCC Committee would be the proper vehicle to address this
issue. I'll forward this over to the Committee listserv.
We're always looking for thoughtful Members for the FCC Committee. Feel
free to hit me offlist if you are interested in joining/helping the
Committee.
Jack
We've got a tower that shoots across their NorthWest border, we'll see how far
we can go in with the help of like minded people.
-- Original Message --
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu,
That would be a Stuart thing. :)
Mike
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com wrote:
Say hi to the girls of East St. Luis for me.
says Marco with an evil grin
WISPA Wants You!
Is Stuart going to be there? I'm afraid there will just be a bunch of
imposters.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Delp
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
45 matches
Mail list logo
