[WISPA] Possibly looking for a WISP or contractor in/near Oxnard CA for a task

2011-05-05 Thread rwf
I may need to have some go by and test a 1.3 mile PtP shot between 2
rooftops for me.

Anyone interested?

 

Ralph

Brightlan.net




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] My day is now dedicated to UBB research. You should too.

2011-05-05 Thread Andy Trimmell
I agree. It costs $100 for each smartphone people have yet they want to
download 50-600gb for $30. Not gonna happen

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My day is now dedicated to UBB research. You should
too.

 

I am either firing or increasing rates.  I can't sit there and have
customers doing 600 gigs for less then my cell bill...

On May 4, 2011 6:58 PM, Mark Nash markl...@uwol.net wrote:




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Possible interference with Alvarion 2.4 / 5.8 GHz

2011-05-05 Thread Eduardo
Hi, I have 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz AP´s in a tower where a company is planning to 
install above our antennas a channel 24 LPTV antenna receiving on 647 MHZ 
(channel 43) and transmitting on 533 MHz (channel 24). My question is if the 
harmonics could cause any interference to us or could be an issue? These are 
the specifications we received from the company: The transmit power will be 580 
watts on TV channel 24 which is 530-536 MHzThe transmitter is heavily filtered 
with a stringent mask to eliminate out of band energy.  
http://louise.hallikainen.org/FCC/FccRules/2010/74/794/If there are any 
problems it's likely due to front end overload of your equipment. That can be 
easily resolved with the addition of filters between your antenna(s) and 
receiver(s).If your 2.4 GHz equipment suffers any interference I'd propose an 
L-com BPF2400A: http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22046If your 5.8 GHz 
equipment is bothered the BPF5800A should eliminate any issues: 
http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22184Any comment will be welcome. 
Thanks.EduardoWebjogger Internet Serviceswww.webjogger.net


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Possible interference with Alvarion 2.4 / 5.8 GHz

2011-05-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
The first thing I'd clarify is who has interference protection priority, in 
their colocation agreement? You or them?

This will define who has to assume the burden of cost or unconvenience to 
resolve and prevent interference.

Are your AP Antennas integrated or embedded? If embedded, the other party does 
not under stand the FCC certified system rules, that prevent you from inserting 
filters, which you couldn't do either without changing your APs to ext models.

I would argue that front in overload is a likely possibilty. I'd argue that you 
should push to have the other parties new equipment to be installed at a 
location a safe distance vertically away from your antennas, to prevent the 
overload, and to pre-calculate what that safe distance needs to be.
(also de-sensitization could occur)

Or, if this is going to be a trial and error thing, that its made clear the 
proceedure and timeline for resolution (which should be immediate) if 
interference is heard. I'd suggest being available on day going live, so you 
can have them shut down, if link quality get hurt for your customers.

If you already have ext model ap in the air, it may be easier to just buy and 
install the filters as a precaution, if the insertion loss is acceptable to 
incur.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


  - Original Message - 
  From: Eduardo 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 2:56 PM
  Subject: [WISPA] Possible interference with Alvarion 2.4 / 5.8 GHz


Hi, I have 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz AP´s in a tower where a company is planning to 
install above our antennas a channel 24 LPTV antenna receiving on 647 MHZ 
(channel 43) and transmitting on 533 MHz (channel 24). My question is if the 
harmonics could cause any interference to us or could be an issue? These are 
the specifications we received from the company: The transmit power will be 580 
watts on TV channel 24 which is 530-536 MHzThe transmitter is heavily filtered 
with a stringent mask to eliminate out of band energy.  
http://louise.hallikainen.org/FCC/FccRules/2010/74/794/If there are any 
problems it's likely due to front end overload of your equipment. That can be 
easily resolved with the addition of filters between your antenna(s) and 
receiver(s).If your 2.4 GHz equipment suffers any interference I'd propose an 
L-com BPF2400A: http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22046If your 5.8 GHz 
equipment is bothered the BPF5800A should eliminate any issues: 
http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22184Any comment will be welcome. Thanks. 
EduardoWebjogger Internet Serviceswww.webjogger.net

--




  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  

   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Possible interference with Alvarion 2.4 / 5.8 GHz

2011-05-05 Thread Marco Coelho
They are pretty far out of band for the two bands you mentioned.  I would
bet that no interference will be noticed.
They would have to have some pretty bad radios to get you with harmonics on
the RF side.  You may experience some Ethernet issues depending on
separation and your shielding, but I would also bet it would be a non issue.

FM transmitters near 100MHz are like a bullet to the head for Ethernet.

Marco




On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Eduardo edua...@webjogger.net wrote:

  Hi,



 I have 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz AP´s in a tower where a company is planning to 
 install above our antennas a channel 24 LPTV antenna receiving on 647 MHZ 
 (channel 43) and transmitting on 533 MHz (channel 24). My question is if the 
 harmonics could cause any interference to us or could be an issue?



 These are the specifications we received from the company:



 The transmit power will be 580 watts on TV channel 24 which is 530-536 MHz

 The transmitter is heavily filtered with a “stringent mask” to eliminate out 
 of band energy.  http://louise.hallikainen.org/FCC/FccRules/2010/74/794/

 If there are any problems it’s likely due to front end overload of your 
 equipment. That can be easily resolved with the addition of filters between 
 your antenna(s) and receiver(s).

 If your 2.4 GHz equipment suffers any interference I’d propose an L-com 
 BPF2400A: http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22046

 If your 5.8 GHz equipment is bothered the BPF5800A should eliminate any 
 issues: http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22184


 Any comment will be welcome.



 Thanks.



 Eduardo

 Webjogger Internet Services
 *www.webjogger.net* http://www.webjogger.net/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Any Mikrotik experts hanging out tonight?

2011-05-05 Thread Grant Stufft
Hi,

Any MT gurus hanging out tonight.  We have a powerouter 732 that we upgraded
from v3.22 to 4.17 tonight.  When we upgraded it complained about a new
license and we did the automatic upgrade and it rebooted just fine.  The
problem is that I cannot reach it now via the public ip addresses. Was
working great before the upgrade.  I can access it just fine over the two
routed internal interfaces but not the masq interfaces. We have three
different sources of bandwidth on 3 of the ethernet interfaces and two of
the ethernet interfaces have our rfc1918 addresses with clients on them.
There are masq statements for each of the 3 bandwidth  interfaces for
192.168.0.0/16 to only go out that particular interface. We then use policy
routing to send the traffic out the different interfaces. It was working
fine until the upgrade.  Now torch shows that there is no traffic going over
the interfaces.  If you go to the nat statements and look at the masq
statements,  the counters are increasing like they are being hit but the
traffic is not leaving the interface.

Any idea what may be happening or more importantly what information is
needed to properly get this working again and fixed?  Worked very well
before and to my eyes, everything looks good.

Thanks



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/