It's not a processor limitation Fred, it's a Linux issue. It can be fixed, but
will require a major re-write. I question that Vyatta has really overcome it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 7/7/2011 08:47 PM, JeffB wrote:
>> ImageStream offers them t
I think a sweet spot for a router would have 60 - 80 gigabits of
throughput. 3x 10Giges and 0 - 10x GigEs. 1x 10GigE goes "East",
another goes "West", and the last goes up to a cheap provider. The
GigEs go to peering fabrics, private peers, alternate upstreams, etc.
Oh, and being able to sat
I'd imagine this answer goes to all of the higher end x86 Mikrotik boxes
that have come out in the past couple years, but
Can it fill the 10 gig interface? IE: If I have those 10x GigE
interfaces going to different networks, can I fill that 10GigE?
I see that your MikroCore 7100 can have
I guess I knew that 10GigE interfaces were available, but was doubting
that you and the MT guys could saturate them.
Internally, I wouldn't be too concerned, but if I had to lease a wave,
I'd want to make sure I could fill it up.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics
At 7/7/2011 08:47 PM, JeffB wrote:
>ImageStream offers them too, but we can't saturate them yet.
I'm curious...what's the biggest CPU you've tried them on? Vyatta
claims to be able to saturate 10G interfaces using multicore
Xeons. Even "high end" Xeon server iron seems cheap compared to the
C
ImageStream offers them too, but we can't saturate them yet.
Jeff
ImageStream
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 7, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 15:02 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> Yeah, MT and ImageStream really don't have anything to offer when
>> really pushing 10 gi
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 15:02 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Yeah, MT and ImageStream really don't have anything to offer when
> really pushing 10 gig interfaces. We'll be needing them before too
> much longer!
I have 10G interfaces available with RouterOS.
--
**
Maybe I should clarify this.
The Powerouter 732 does more than 2Gbps. It has 7GigE ports on their
own independent 2.01GB buss (not a shared buss). We bonded 6 of them
and got 5.9Gbps TCP across those 6.
The Powerouter 2200 series comes standard with 10 1GigE ports. We have
a dual port
We have a new GM and has switched us to using a new cable for towers.
Its made by pcAirLink Wireless part number: CA5EF-FTP-RF1000. I am
worried about the gel inside getting hot and running down the cable.
Anyone ever used this? If not what do you use? Does the gel/waterblock
leak when hot?
Many of our well established customers would take issue with being called
"start-up"... :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Roman wrote:
> Is there any way to send tables here?
> Plain text removed all the borders of my table making it unreadable...
>
> -- Forwarded m
Both disadvantages seem like false information to me. Especially OSPF
issues on ImageStream - every product has its bugs and there are probably
more versions then other products.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 a
Is there any way to send tables here?
Plain text removed all the borders of my table making it unreadable...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roman
Date: Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: [WISPA] Choosing core router for small - medium WISP
To: wireless@wispa.org
Great tha
Great thanks for all who participated in discussion! This community is very
good place to ask question and get opinions from experienced wireless
professionals.
Opinions vary, though. And as the way to thank community and to provoke
additional discussion I would like to summarize all the inputs f
Is there anyone with video meter balancing experience around the Ellensburg,
WA area?
Mike Goicoechea
Wispa Vendor Member
Cielo Systems International
806-977-9001 ext 101
806-763-1945 fax
Skype Mike.Goik
m...@cielosystems.net
-
+1 on point number 1. I've heard the phrase many times "nobody every got fired
for buying Cisco".
Greg
On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:02 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> To clarify.
>
> 1) Linux routers are plenty good for Enterprise. My point was that its a
> harder sell to sell them a product they dont
To clarify.
1) Linux routers are plenty good for Enterprise. My point was that its a
harder sell to sell them a product they dont know, when there could be many
third party trusted advisors chiming in with an opinion that contradicts yours.
But no doubt Linux routers can be very power and
Jim,
Thats the way to make a sale. I dont see Cisco or Juniper offering that kind of
quality support.
Roman,
If this is for you, and you are only needing less than 10- 300mbps of bandwidth
for small to medium need, do yourself a favor, and save your money, and save
your time, and go buy a MI
17 matches
Mail list logo
