Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread Forbes Mercy

  
  
I wonder if it would benefit us to send a "New Tax Coming to a
Constituent Near You" release where in this era of taxes being waged
to pay off debt, a new tax is being proposed by the FCC to the
broadband industry which will only serve to subsidize the telephone
industry with broadband deriving zero benefit? Instead of defensive
it's a pro-active move where politicians running under a no new
taxes platform will have to roll it in.

I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've felt all along
the USF to CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco
industry to do a hostile takeover of our broadband industry with
government aid and we shouldn't be afraid to say it.

Forbes

On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote:

  
  Throw out that word "tax" and
  everyone gets all excited but this is really old news and not
  really any news at all. Just the transition of the USF program
  (subsidies to extend phone service to rural areas) into the
  CAF program where the subsidies will now go to extend
  broadband service to the boonies. WISPA has made a ton of FCC
  filings on this already. Most of them are defensive in nature
  (preventing WISPs from being overbuilt) but a few are
  offensive - trying to open up the possibilities for WISPs that
  want subsidies (most don't) to get them. 
  
  jack
  
  

  On 8/28/2012 1:20 PM, Jim Patient
wrote:
  
  





  http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/
  
  Jim Patient
  Link Technologies, Inc.
  314-735-0270 x102
  http://wlan1.com 
  http://towercoverage.com
  http://www.linktechs.net

  
  




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  
  
  -- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - "Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks"
Serving the WISP Community since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  760-678-5033  jun...@ask-wi.com




  
  
  
  ___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  
  
  
  No virus
found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5231 - Release Date:
08/28/12


  

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread chris cooper
I wouldn't do that in the pre election climate.  It seems like it could
be taken a couple of different ways, any one of which might alienate 50%
of your customers.
 
cc
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:25 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org; fcccommit...@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!
 
I wonder if it would benefit us to send a New Tax Coming to a
Constituent Near You release where in this era of taxes being waged to
pay off debt, a new tax is being proposed by the FCC to the broadband
industry which will only serve to subsidize the telephone industry with
broadband deriving zero benefit?  Instead of defensive it's a pro-active
move where politicians running under a no new taxes platform will have
to roll it in.

I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've felt all along the
USF to CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco industry to do
a hostile takeover of our broadband industry with government aid and we
shouldn't be afraid to say it.

Forbes

On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote: 
Throw out that word tax and everyone gets all excited but this is
really old news and not really any news at all. Just the transition of
the USF program (subsidies to extend phone service to rural areas) into
the CAF program where the subsidies will now go to extend broadband
service to the boonies. WISPA has made a ton of FCC filings on this
already. Most of them are defensive in nature (preventing WISPs from
being overbuilt) but a few are offensive - trying to open up the
possibilities for WISPs that want subsidies (most don't) to get them. 

jack


On 8/28/2012 1:20 PM, Jim Patient wrote:
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/
 
Jim Patient
Link Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270 x102
http://wlan1.com 
http://towercoverage.com http://towercoverage.com/ 
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/  

 




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
Serving the WISP Community since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  760-678-5033  jun...@ask-wi.com
 
 
 




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5231 - Release Date:
08/28/12
 
inline: image001.jpg___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread Jack Unger

  
  
I see sending any kind of WISPA
"release" as just election-year political gamesmanship that is
likely to hurt us more than help us. 

This so-called "tax" is just being shifted from voice to
broadband. The FCC's job (as mandated by Congress) is to extend
broadband to everyone. 

Further, I don't agree that the FCC is trying to put us out of
business. The USF tables have been heavily tilted against us
because in the past (like 5 years ago) WISPs were not a "player"
at the government level. We were not organized enough then to
show up and make our voice heard. Now we are organized, our
voice is being heard and we're making pretty decent headway. I'd
say we stick to our business of advocating effectively to
advance our industry and leave the "tax and spend" gamesmanship
to the professional politicians. 

jack


  
On 8/29/2012 11:24 AM, Forbes Mercy
  wrote:


  
  I wonder if it would benefit us to send a "New Tax Coming to a
  Constituent Near You" release where in this era of taxes being
  waged to pay off debt, a new tax is being proposed by the FCC to
  the broadband industry which will only serve to subsidize the
  telephone industry with broadband deriving zero benefit? Instead
  of defensive it's a pro-active move where politicians running
  under a no new taxes platform will have to roll it in.
  
  I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've felt all
  along the USF to CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco
  industry to do a hostile takeover of our broadband industry with
  government aid and we shouldn't be afraid to say it.
  
  Forbes
  
  On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
  

Throw out that word "tax"
and everyone gets all excited but this is really old news
and not really any news at all. Just the transition of the
USF program (subsidies to extend phone service to rural
areas) into the CAF program where the subsidies will now go
to extend broadband service to the boonies. WISPA has made a
ton of FCC filings on this already. Most of them are
defensive in nature (preventing WISPs from being overbuilt)
but a few are offensive - trying to open up the
possibilities for WISPs that want subsidies (most don't) to
get them. 

jack


  
On 8/28/2012 1:20 PM, Jim Patient
  wrote:


  
  
  
  
  
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/

Jim Patient
Link Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270 x102
http://wlan1.com 
http://towercoverage.com
http://www.linktechs.net
  


  
  
  
  
  ___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - "Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks"
Serving the WISP Community since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  760-678-5033  jun...@ask-wi.com







___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




No virus
  found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5231 - Release
  Date: 08/28/12
  
  
  
  
  
  ___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - "Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks"
Serving the WISP Community since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  760-678-5033  jun...@ask-wi.com




  

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
I agree with your conclusions Jack, but it is absolutely a tax.

 

Regards,

Jeff
Sales Manager, Blue Technology
574-935-8484 x106 (US/Can)
574-220-7826 (Cell)
+1 574-935-8484 (Int'l) 

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:52 PM
To: WISPA General List; WISPA's FCC Committee
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

 

I see sending any kind of WISPA release as just election-year political
gamesmanship that is likely to hurt us more than help us.  

This so-called tax is just being shifted from voice to broadband. The
FCC's job (as mandated by Congress) is to extend broadband to everyone. 

Further, I don't agree that the FCC is trying to put us out of business. The
USF  tables have been heavily tilted against us because in the past (like 5
years ago) WISPs were not a player at the government level. We were not
organized enough then to show up and make our voice heard. Now we are
organized, our voice is being heard and we're making pretty decent headway.
I'd say we stick to our business of advocating effectively to advance our
industry and leave the tax and spend gamesmanship to the professional
politicians. 

jack



On 8/29/2012 11:24 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote:

I wonder if it would benefit us to send a New Tax Coming to a Constituent
Near You release where in this era of taxes being waged to pay off debt, a
new tax is being proposed by the FCC to the broadband industry which will
only serve to subsidize the telephone industry with broadband deriving zero
benefit?  Instead of defensive it's a pro-active move where politicians
running under a no new taxes platform will have to roll it in.

I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've felt all along the USF
to CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco industry to do a
hostile takeover of our broadband industry with government aid and we
shouldn't be afraid to say it.

Forbes

On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote: 

Throw out that word tax and everyone gets all excited but this is really
old news and not really any news at all. Just the transition of the USF
program (subsidies to extend phone service to rural areas) into the CAF
program where the subsidies will now go to extend broadband service to the
boonies. WISPA has made a ton of FCC filings on this already. Most of them
are defensive in nature (preventing WISPs from being overbuilt) but a few
are offensive - trying to open up the possibilities for WISPs that want
subsidies (most don't) to get them. 

jack



On 8/28/2012 1:20 PM, Jim Patient wrote:

http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/

 

Jim Patient

Link Technologies, Inc.

314-735-0270 x102

http://wlan1.com 

http://towercoverage.com http://towercoverage.com/ 

http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/  



 






___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
Serving the WISP Community since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  760-678-5033  jun...@ask-wi.com
 
 
 






___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless






No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5231 - Release Date: 08/28/12







___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless





-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
Serving the WISP Community since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  760-678-5033  jun...@ask-wi.com
 
 
 
inline: image001.jpg___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread Jack Unger

  
  
I also think it's a tax too. 

I just don't think we should lose our cool and do destructive
things that could hurt our industry just because it's a tax. 


  
On 8/29/2012 1:27 PM, Jeff Broadwick -
  Lists wrote:


  
  
  
  
  
I agree with your
  conclusions Jack, but it
  is absolutely a tax.


  Regards,

Jeff
Sales Manager, Blue Technology
574-935-8484 x106 (US/Can)
574-220-7826 (Cell)
+1 574-935-8484 (Int'l)
  


  

  
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jack Unger
Sent:
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
3:52 PM
To: WISPA
General List; WISPA's
FCC Committee
Subject:
Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take
from the poor and give to the rich!


I see sending
  any kind of WISPA "release" as just election-year
  political
  gamesmanship that is likely to hurt us more than help us.
  
  
  This so-called "tax" is just being shifted from voice to
  broadband.
  The FCC's job (as mandated by Congress) is to extend
  broadband to everyone. 
  
  Further, I don't agree that the FCC is trying to put us
  out of business. The
  USF tables have been heavily tilted against us because in
  the past (like
  5 years ago) WISPs were not a "player" at the government
  level. We
  were not organized enough then to show up and make our
  voice heard. Now we are
  organized, our voice is being heard and we're making
  pretty decent headway. I'd
  say we stick to our business of advocating effectively to
  advance our industry
  and leave the "tax and spend" gamesmanship to the
  professional
  politicians. 
  
  jack
  


  On 8/29/2012 11:24
AM, Forbes Mercy wrote:


  I wonder if it
would benefit us to send a "New
Tax Coming to a Constituent Near You" release where in
this era of taxes
being waged to pay off debt, a new tax is being proposed
by the FCC to the
broadband industry which will only serve to subsidize
the telephone industry
with broadband deriving zero benefit? Instead of
defensive it's a
pro-active move where politicians running under a no new
taxes platform will
have to roll it in.

I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've
felt all along the USF to
CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco
industry to do a hostile
takeover of our broadband industry with government aid
and we shouldn't be
afraid to say it.

Forbes

On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote: 
  Throw out
that
word "tax" and everyone gets all excited but this is
really old news
and not really any news at all. Just the transition of
the USF program
(subsidies to extend phone service to rural areas) into
the CAF program where
the subsidies will now go to extend broadband service to
the boonies. WISPA has
made a ton of FCC filings on this already. Most of them
are defensive in nature
(preventing WISPs from being overbuilt) but a few are
offensive - trying to
open up the possibilities for WISPs that want subsidies
(most don't) to get
them. 

jack

  
  
On 8/28/2012
  1:20 PM, Jim Patient wrote:
  
  
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/

Jim Patient
Link
  Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270
  x102
http://wlan1.com
  
http://towercoverage.com
http://www.linktechs.net
   

Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread Mike Hammett
I guess the reference to not being a government player back then depends on 
what entity you're talking about.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org, WISPA's FCC Committee 
fcccommit...@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:51:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!


I see sending any kind of WISPA release as just election-year political 
gamesmanship that is likely to hurt us more than help us. 

This so-called tax is just being shifted from voice to broadband. The FCC's 
job (as mandated by Congress) is to extend broadband to everyone. 

Further, I don't agree that the FCC is trying to put us out of business. The 
USF tables have been heavily tilted against us because in the past (like 5 
years ago) WISPs were not a player at the government level. We were not 
organized enough then to show up and make our voice heard. Now we are 
organized, our voice is being heard and we're making pretty decent headway. I'd 
say we stick to our business of advocating effectively to advance our industry 
and leave the tax and spend gamesmanship to the professional politicians. 

jack 



On 8/29/2012 11:24 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote: 


I wonder if it would benefit us to send a New Tax Coming to a Constituent Near 
You release where in this era of taxes being waged to pay off debt, a new tax 
is being proposed by the FCC to the broadband industry which will only serve to 
subsidize the telephone industry with broadband deriving zero benefit? Instead 
of defensive it's a pro-active move where politicians running under a no new 
taxes platform will have to roll it in. 

I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've felt all along the USF to 
CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco industry to do a hostile 
takeover of our broadband industry with government aid and we shouldn't be 
afraid to say it. 

Forbes 

On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote: 

Throw out that word tax and everyone gets all excited but this is really old 
news and not really any news at all. Just the transition of the USF program 
(subsidies to extend phone service to rural areas) into the CAF program where 
the subsidies will now go to extend broadband service to the boonies. WISPA has 
made a ton of FCC filings on this already. Most of them are defensive in nature 
(preventing WISPs from being overbuilt) but a few are offensive - trying to 
open up the possibilities for WISPs that want subsidies (most don't) to get 
them. 

jack 



On 8/28/2012 1:20 PM, Jim Patient wrote: 





http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/ 



Jim Patient 

Link Technologies, Inc. 

314-735-0270 x102 

http://wlan1.com 

http://towercoverage.com 

http://www.linktechs.net 





___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
Serving the WISP Community since 1993 www.ask-wi.com 760-678-5033 
jun...@ask-wi.com 

___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



No virus found in this message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5231 - Release Date: 08/28/12 


___
Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
Serving the WISP Community since 1993 www.ask-wi.com 760-678-5033 
jun...@ask-wi.com 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!

2012-08-29 Thread John Scrivner
What's that supposed to mean?
Scriv


On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.netwrote:

 I guess the reference to not being a government player back then depends
 on what entity you're talking about.



 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 - Original Message -
 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org, WISPA's FCC Committee 
 fcccommit...@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:51:32 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Oh Great take from the poor and give to the rich!


 I see sending any kind of WISPA release as just election-year political
 gamesmanship that is likely to hurt us more than help us.

 This so-called tax is just being shifted from voice to broadband. The
 FCC's job (as mandated by Congress) is to extend broadband to everyone.

 Further, I don't agree that the FCC is trying to put us out of business.
 The USF tables have been heavily tilted against us because in the past
 (like 5 years ago) WISPs were not a player at the government level. We
 were not organized enough then to show up and make our voice heard. Now we
 are organized, our voice is being heard and we're making pretty decent
 headway. I'd say we stick to our business of advocating effectively to
 advance our industry and leave the tax and spend gamesmanship to the
 professional politicians.

 jack



 On 8/29/2012 11:24 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote:


 I wonder if it would benefit us to send a New Tax Coming to a Constituent
 Near You release where in this era of taxes being waged to pay off debt, a
 new tax is being proposed by the FCC to the broadband industry which will
 only serve to subsidize the telephone industry with broadband deriving zero
 benefit? Instead of defensive it's a pro-active move where politicians
 running under a no new taxes platform will have to roll it in.

 I know the FCC wouldn't be thrilled with us but we've felt all along the
 USF to CAF conversion was just the FCC helping the Telco industry to do a
 hostile takeover of our broadband industry with government aid and we
 shouldn't be afraid to say it.

 Forbes

 On 8/28/2012 2:28 PM, Jack Unger wrote:

 Throw out that word tax and everyone gets all excited but this is really
 old news and not really any news at all. Just the transition of the USF
 program (subsidies to extend phone service to rural areas) into the CAF
 program where the subsidies will now go to extend broadband service to the
 boonies. WISPA has made a ton of FCC filings on this already. Most of them
 are defensive in nature (preventing WISPs from being overbuilt) but a few
 are offensive - trying to open up the possibilities for WISPs that want
 subsidies (most don't) to get them.

 jack



 On 8/28/2012 1:20 PM, Jim Patient wrote:





 http://www.ijreview.com/2012/08/13896-fcc-may-soon-tax-internet-service/



 Jim Patient

 Link Technologies, Inc.

 314-735-0270 x102

 http://wlan1.com

 http://towercoverage.com

 http://www.linktechs.net





 ___
 Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
 Serving the WISP Community since 1993 www.ask-wi.com 760-678-5033
 jun...@ask-wi.com

 ___
 Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5231 - Release Date: 08/28/12


 ___
 Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks
 Serving the WISP Community since 1993 www.ask-wi.com 760-678-5033
 jun...@ask-wi.com
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless