Re: [WISPA] [WISPA - Offlist] OSPF Tutorial/Guide

2013-07-21 Thread Christian Palecek
That is how all ospf costs default based on ether link speed.  In reality it is 
a giant math problem, you don't want to assign costs based on the defaults if 
you don't have a wired network.  

You should actually set costs higher and not use single digits so you have 
wiggle room.  You also want to try and eliminate the static routes or atleast 
set their metric so high that they are last resort.

Redistributed routes are important as well.  It is a balancing act.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

 Original message 
From: Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net 
Date: 07/20/2013  7:59 PM  (GMT-07:00) 
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA - Offlist] OSPF Tutorial/Guide 
 
I know that is how Cisco figures default values, but it is not always the best. 
 I may have a 10M wire link and a 54M wireless link.  The average data flow is 
5M, so want the 10M wire to be the primary because it is more reliable.  I 
would give it a lower cost than the faster wireless link.

If you have a wireless link that you know suffers from temperature inversion 
problems every morning and one that doesn't, but is slower, you may want the 
slower, more reliable link to have the lower cost so that your reliability 
stays high, but if that link goes down, you still have a link to use.

As with most things in this business, there are general guidelines, but you 
also have to know your network and make informed decisions, not just follow 
some rule of thumb.



On 7/20/2013 8:06 PM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
Cost should be set based on the speed of the link.  So, if you have a 1 Gbps 
link in your network, set the cost of routers on either side to 1.  If you have 
a 333 Mbps link, set the cost of the routers on either side to 3.  100 Mbps 
link?  Cost = 10.  So, your 1 Gbps link speed is really 1000 Mbps so cost = 
1000 / Speed.


On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Bob iPhone Kim evdo.hs...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott,

Can you help remotely? 

ALL... do we have a services board anywhere... kinda like a craigslist for our 
group?


On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I have a network with about 800 devices running OSPF.  If you need more help, 
let me know.
I do consulting for several WISPs helping get from bridged to routed, setting 
up routers correctly, etc.
If is is easy, no charge.  If is going to take some time/effort, I charge 
$65.00/hour for the actual time involved, no minimum.  Let me know what I can 
do to help.

 
-- 
Robert Q Kim
iPhone Repair Connection San Diego
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiSr78Kk8ZU
2611 S Coast Highway
San Diego, CA 92007
310 598 1606

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6506 - Release Date: 07/20/13


-- 
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration

 

Mikrotik Advanced Certified
 
www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060
(765) 439-4253
(855) 231-6239___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA - Offlist] OSPF Tutorial/Guide

2013-07-21 Thread Chris Fabien
Thanks for the discussion guys, I'll play around with my bench setup this
evening and see if I can get it working like I want.


On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Christian Palecek christ...@cybernet1.com
 wrote:

 That is how all ospf costs default based on ether link speed.  In reality
 it is a giant math problem, you don't want to assign costs based on the
 defaults if you don't have a wired network.

 You should actually set costs higher and not use single digits so you have
 wiggle room.  You also want to try and eliminate the static routes or
 atleast set their metric so high that they are last resort.

 Redistributed routes are important as well.  It is a balancing act.


 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone



  Original message 
 From: Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net
 Date: 07/20/2013 7:59 PM (GMT-07:00)
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA - Offlist] OSPF Tutorial/Guide


 I know that is how Cisco figures default values, but it is not always the
 best.  I may have a 10M wire link and a 54M wireless link.  The average
 data flow is 5M, so want the 10M wire to be the primary because it is more
 reliable.  I would give it a lower cost than the faster wireless link.

 If you have a wireless link that you know suffers from temperature
 inversion problems every morning and one that doesn't, but is slower, you
 may want the slower, more reliable link to have the lower cost so that your
 reliability stays high, but if that link goes down, you still have a link
 to use.

 As with most things in this business, there are general guidelines, but
 you also have to know your network and make informed decisions, not just
 follow some rule of thumb.



 On 7/20/2013 8:06 PM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:

 Cost should be set based on the speed of the link.  So, if you have a 1
 Gbps link in your network, set the cost of routers on either side to 1.  If
 you have a 333 Mbps link, set the cost of the routers on either side to 3.
  100 Mbps link?  Cost = 10.  So, your 1 Gbps link speed is really 1000 Mbps
 so cost = 1000 / Speed.


 On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Bob iPhone Kim evdo.hs...@gmail.comwrote:

 Scott,

  Can you help remotely?

  ALL... do we have a services board anywhere... kinda like a craigslist
 for our group?


  On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:

  I have a network with about 800 devices running OSPF.  If you need more
 help, let me know.
 I do consulting for several WISPs helping get from bridged to routed,
 setting up routers correctly, etc.
 If is is easy, no charge.  If is going to take some time/effort, I
 charge $65.00/hour for the actual time involved, no minimum.  Let me know
 what I can do to help.


  --
 Robert Q Kim
 iPhone Repair Connection San Diego
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiSr78Kk8ZU
  2611 S Coast Highway
 San Diego, CA 92007
 310 598 1606

 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




 ___
 Wireless mailing 
 listWireless@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6506 - Release Date: 07/20/13


 --
 Scott Reed
 Owner
 NewWays Networking, LLC
 Wireless Networking
 Network Design, Installation and Administration



 Mikrotik Advanced Certified
  www.nwwnet.net(765) 855-1060(765) 439-4253(855) 231-6239


 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA - Offlist] OSPF Tutorial/Guide

2013-07-21 Thread Scott Reed
No, it isn't. Mikrotik defaults everything to cost 10, no matter the 
medium or speed.
I am pretty sure I have seen other vendors that set everything to a 
particular value.

Cisco does default based on medium link speed.

On 7/21/2013 11:35 AM, Christian Palecek wrote:
That is how all ospf costs default based on ether link speed.  In 
reality it is a giant math problem, you don't want to assign costs 
based on the defaults if you don't have a wired network.


You should actually set costs higher and not use single digits so you 
have wiggle room.  You also want to try and eliminate the static 
routes or atleast set their metric so high that they are last resort.


Redistributed routes are important as well.  It is a balancing act.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone



 Original message 
From: Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net
Date: 07/20/2013 7:59 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA - Offlist] OSPF Tutorial/Guide


I know that is how Cisco figures default values, but it is not always 
the best.  I may have a 10M wire link and a 54M wireless link.  The 
average data flow is 5M, so want the 10M wire to be the primary 
because it is more reliable.  I would give it a lower cost than the 
faster wireless link.


If you have a wireless link that you know suffers from temperature 
inversion problems every morning and one that doesn't, but is slower, 
you may want the slower, more reliable link to have the lower cost so 
that your reliability stays high, but if that link goes down, you 
still have a link to use.


As with most things in this business, there are general guidelines, 
but you also have to know your network and make informed decisions, 
not just follow some rule of thumb.




On 7/20/2013 8:06 PM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
Cost should be set based on the speed of the link.  So, if you have a 
1 Gbps link in your network, set the cost of routers on either side 
to 1.  If you have a 333 Mbps link, set the cost of the routers on 
either side to 3.  100 Mbps link?  Cost = 10.  So, your 1 Gbps link 
speed is really 1000 Mbps so cost = 1000 / Speed.



On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Bob iPhone Kim evdo.hs...@gmail.com 
mailto:evdo.hs...@gmail.com wrote:


Scott,

Can you help remotely?

ALL... do we have a services board anywhere... kinda like a
craigslist for our group?


On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net
mailto:sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:

I have a network with about 800 devices running OSPF. If you
need more help, let me know.
I do consulting for several WISPs helping get from bridged to
routed, setting up routers correctly, etc.
If is is easy, no charge.  If is going to take some
time/effort, I charge $65.00/hour for the actual time
involved, no minimum.  Let me know what I can do to help.

-- 
Robert Q Kim

iPhone Repair Connection San Diego
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiSr78Kk8ZU
2611 S Coast Highway
San Diego, CA 92007
310 598 1606 tel:310%20598%201606

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org mailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6506 - Release Date: 07/20/13



--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration

  


Mikrotik Advanced Certified
  
www.nwwnet.net

(765) 855-1060
(765) 439-4253
(855) 231-6239


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6508 - Release Date: 07/21/13



--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration

 


Mikrotik Advanced Certified
 
www.nwwnet.net

(765) 855-1060
(765) 439-4253
(855) 231-6239

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless