[WISPA] looking to purchasing bandwidth

2013-12-23 Thread heith petersen
I was looking to see if anyone could provide me with an alternate or additional 
bandwidth option in South Dakota, preferably central South Dakota. We currently 
use the areas cable company, which is great, but I don’t believe they are real 
competitive nationwide. I don’t believe any real major carriers provide service 
to the area, other than Century Link. Any ways if I could get some pointers 
that would be great

thanks
heith___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm

2013-12-23 Thread Gino Villarini
Cant compare performant vs ospf...

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Dec 23, 2013, at 10:10 AM, "Dennis Burgess" 
mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote:

This really comes down to OSPF settings on the link.  Things like on RF failure 
drop Ethernet would help as well as if they had a min-modulation option (i.e. 
if I drop below this performance i.e. modulation), drop the link.

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second 
Edition”
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
 Office: 314-735-0270 Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net – Skype: 
linktechs
 -- Create Wireless Coverage’s with 
www.towercoverage.com – 900Mhz – LTE – 3G – 3.65 
– TV Whitespace

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm


That's what I thought, too.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 21, 2013 10:01 AM, "Gino Villarini" 
mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:
This is where a solution like performant really shines

Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Darin Steffl
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 10:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm


What OSPF settings do you use to facilitate such a quick fail over to tik 
backups? Also, this wouldn't switch over until the link completely died so do 
you do anything special to have OSPF handle this or do you have to wait for it 
to die? I can just see the link getting bad enough that it will send the 
smallest amount of data but not drop thus limiting the capacity to even less 
than a backup link in place.

I remember chuck talking about something in the forums about dropping ethernet 
past a certain signal threshold or when RF link drops.
On Dec 21, 2013 12:04 AM, "Jim Patient" 
mailto:jpati...@linktechs.net>> wrote:
Just thought I would share some real world stuff.  Don’t get me wrong this is 
in no way dissing this AF link.  It has worked geat and I fully expect it 
to drop off in a hard down poor like this. That’s why we have 2 5GHz MT links 
to fall back on.  I just thought it was cool to see everything working like it 
should.

This happened tonight.  You can see our TP weather station rainfall graph. The 
weather station is just down the hill from pinoak tower (no longer a real 
pinoak).  The AF link drops off, the MT 5GHz link ramping up as the AF link 
drops and throughput on the drain pipe stays stable while all this was 
happening and no lost packets.

There is also link path so you can see distance and actual signal of the link 
right now with just basically mist.

You can almost graph the rainfall rate by the throughput on the MT backup link 
:)

Thx,

Jim Patient
Office: 314-735-0270
towercoverage.com
linktechs.net
wlan1.com




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
<>___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm

2013-12-23 Thread Dennis Burgess
This really comes down to OSPF settings on the link.  Things like on RF
failure drop Ethernet would help as well as if they had a min-modulation
option (i.e. if I drop below this performance i.e. modulation), drop the
link.  

 

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS-
Second Edition  "

 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services

 Office: 314-735-0270   Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net   - Skype: linktechs


 -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com
  - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV
Whitespace  

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm

 

That's what I thought, too.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Dec 21, 2013 10:01 AM, "Gino Villarini"  wrote:

This is where a solution like performant really shines

 

Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Darin Steffl
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 10:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm

 

What OSPF settings do you use to facilitate such a quick fail over to
tik backups? Also, this wouldn't switch over until the link completely
died so do you do anything special to have OSPF handle this or do you
have to wait for it to die? I can just see the link getting bad enough
that it will send the smallest amount of data but not drop thus limiting
the capacity to even less than a backup link in place. 

I remember chuck talking about something in the forums about dropping
ethernet past a certain signal threshold or when RF link drops. 

On Dec 21, 2013 12:04 AM, "Jim Patient"  wrote:

Just thought I would share some real world stuff.  Don't get me wrong
this is in no way dissing this AF link.  It has worked geat and I
fully expect it to drop off in a hard down poor like this. That's why we
have 2 5GHz MT links to fall back on.  I just thought it was cool to see
everything working like it should.  

 

This happened tonight.  You can see our TP weather station rainfall
graph. The weather station is just down the hill from pinoak tower (no
longer a real pinoak).  The AF link drops off, the MT 5GHz link ramping
up as the AF link drops and throughput on the drain pipe stays stable
while all this was happening and no lost packets.

 

There is also link path so you can see distance and actual signal of the
link right now with just basically mist.

 

You can almost graph the rainfall rate by the throughput on the MT
backup link J

 

Thx, 

 

Jim Patient

Office: 314-735-0270

towercoverage.com   
linktechs.net  

wlan1.com  
 

 

 


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

<>___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless