This really comes down to OSPF settings on the link.  Things like on RF
failure drop Ethernet would help as well as if they had a min-modulation
option (i.e. if I drop below this performance i.e. modulation), drop the
link.  

 

Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS-
Second Edition <http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm> "

 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services

 Office: 314-735-0270 <tel:314-735-0270>  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/>  - Skype: linktechs
<skype:linktechs?call>

 -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com
<http://www.towercoverage.com/>  - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV
Whitespace  

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm

 

That's what I thought, too.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Dec 21, 2013 10:01 AM, "Gino Villarini" <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote:

This is where a solution like performant really shines

 

Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Darin Steffl
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 10:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF and rain storm

 

What OSPF settings do you use to facilitate such a quick fail over to
tik backups? Also, this wouldn't switch over until the link completely
died so do you do anything special to have OSPF handle this or do you
have to wait for it to die? I can just see the link getting bad enough
that it will send the smallest amount of data but not drop thus limiting
the capacity to even less than a backup link in place. 

I remember chuck talking about something in the forums about dropping
ethernet past a certain signal threshold or when RF link drops. 

On Dec 21, 2013 12:04 AM, "Jim Patient" <jpati...@linktechs.net> wrote:

Just thought I would share some real world stuff.  Don't get me wrong
this is in no way dissing this AF link.  It has worked grrrreat and I
fully expect it to drop off in a hard down poor like this. That's why we
have 2 5GHz MT links to fall back on.  I just thought it was cool to see
everything working like it should.  

 

This happened tonight.  You can see our TP weather station rainfall
graph. The weather station is just down the hill from pinoak tower (no
longer a real pinoak).  The AF link drops off, the MT 5GHz link ramping
up as the AF link drops and throughput on the drain pipe stays stable
while all this was happening and no lost packets.

 

There is also link path so you can see distance and actual signal of the
link right now with just basically mist.

 

You can almost graph the rainfall rate by the throughput on the MT
backup link J

 

Thx, 

 

Jim Patient

Office: 314-735-0270

towercoverage.com <http://towercoverage.com/>  
linktechs.net <http://linktechs.net/> 

wlan1.com <http://wlan1.com/> 
 

 

 


_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

<<image001.png>>

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to