Anyone with source for this?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Feedback?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Update Last week we (along with other RF users in the community) were
invited to the AFB to meet the folks that run the radar there and to see the
spectrum analyzer screens. During this meeting, it was discussed that what the
AF was trying to accomplish was to remove all users within
If your radio is causing interference to a licensed radio they have --
they can say shut it down. Otherwise a request of shut everything down
on the band I don't think holds water
On 6/12/14, 1:31 PM, Scott Carullo wrote:
Update Last week we (along with other RF users in the
I guess, if you had any doubt, that this shows with no question the
pecking order. How would you like to be considering an IPO and have
this as part of the Cautions in the disclosure?..I wonder what
part of the frequency properties make this band the one for this radar
or was it
Yes it really is that easy. Welcome to the New World Order.
The Government owns the spectrum and we only get to use it if they feel
like letting us.
End of story.
In WW2 they shut down Ham radio for security even though today it is
accepted that hams are Helping the Government in
Thats going to be something we bring up at the meeting. Its going to boil down
to a they say vs we say - who do you think is going to lose that battle? They
are claiming a radio operating on 5795 on 20Mhz channel will interfere with
their radar on 5765 with about a 1Mhz channel width.
Regarding the suspect looks a lot better, my suggestion would be bring
a laptop that you can use to access your network remotely and, while
you're all there looking at their analyzers, turn off and/or change
channels on your radios. It will be harder to make flippant subjective
calls like
I've already looked at their SA screens. Remember they have a multi-million
dollar receiver attached to a giant 15 meter or so movable dish that can hear
down below -120db. I'm not sure how it could have seen one weak radio the way
stuff was updating on their flat-screen computer monitors
I'm going to ask the FCC Enforcement Bureau to
reschedule the meeting to June 25 (one week later) so WISPA's FCC
Committee Chair (Alex Phillips) and I (WISPA's FCC Committee
Technical Consultant) can attend. For any solution to be
successful, we need more
Hi all,
We have some equipment for sale listed below. Please email me OFF LIST,
if you are interested and we can talk pricing. I don't monitor the list
daily, so please send anything to me directly.
(all include power supplies except where noted)
900 Mhz:
UBNT Rocket M900 - quantity 5
UBNT
http://radiusvision.com/complete-systems/cellular-ip-camera-systems/
On 6/12/2014 6:27 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Anyone with source for this?
12 matches
Mail list logo