Re: [WISPA] ot rj45 crimpers
http://www.happcontrols.com/electrical_supplies/92060900.htm --- Aubrey Wells One Ring Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: Hi All, I'm looking for a crimper I saw someone talk about. It uses special rj45 connectors that allow the cable to go through the end. Then the crimper crimps and cuts to length at the same time. Anyone know what it's called and where to get the connectors and the crimper? thanks! Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 2 WRAP boards in 1 mini-box 4A2E
Does anyone know where I can get the correct hex standoffs to stack two WRAP boards in a mini-box 4A2E enclosure? Thanks. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 2 WRAP boards in 1 mini-box 4A2E
In case anyone else needs them, I found them at www.fastenersuperstore.com http://tinyurl.com/qwqy8 --- Aubrey Wells One Ring Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?
How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other lease agreement you enter in to (car, house, apartment, whatever) they want to make sure you can pay up before they give you the lease. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:47 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] rooftop leasing? None of their business. We had a request like this, and claimed that it was unfair business practice, and the landlord dropped their request for such information. Probably ended up costing us that extra $100 / month but our financial statements are no one's business. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Metcalf Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:11 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] rooftop leasing? Aftering spending almost 8 weeks trying to get a lease with a rooftop provider, they come back at us with a request for a business plan and financial statement before going forward --- Thoughts? Has anybody had a request like this before? We haven't Thanks Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Tony Weasler > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:43 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cogent - Level3 > > On 10/6/2005 1:03 PM, Tom DeReggi created: > >> To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated > >> between L3 and Cogent. > > > > I heard otherwise, however I can't prove that. > > Cogent on their own web site said that agreements were not violated: > > "Level 3 terminated its peering with Cogent without cause (as > permitted under its peering agreement with Cogent) even though both > Cogent and Level 3 remained in full compliance with the previously > existing interconnection agreement." > http://status.cogentco.com/ > > >> There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is blocking Cogent > >> traffic through Cogent's Verio transit (which Cogent pays $$ for.) > > > > There was evidence. I wish I saved my traceroutes yesterday. > > To make more clear, Cogent is our backbone. > > When going to www.logmein.com, the last successfull hop was a peer > > labelled similar to verio.cogentco.com, meaning we crossed over to > > Verio's side. (the actual name was more meaningful). Now today, the > > traffic destined for that site stops cold at the first hop from our > > network, meaning it does not get routes from Level3 on where to send > > the data, once we enter Cogent's network. Unless you are referring > > that Cogent is blocking any advertised route info from Level3, which > > is highly unlikely. If Level3 was allowing our IPs to go through > > Verio's link, we would receive routes to route our packets in that > > direction across Cogent's network, and packets would travel further > > into Cogent's network (such as to the Verio link). If Cogent blocked > > traffic to Verio, it would most likely block it at the peer, not at > > the entry to Cogent's network from us as their client. > > This isn't evidence of blocking on L3's side. It could be because > Cogent only purchases transit to certain prefixes and L3 isn't one of > them (and Verio is filtering the announcements.) It could be because > Cogent internally uses traffic engineering to prevent L3 traffic from > reaching them over their Verio transit circuits. One of the two > scenarios is likely given their peering arrangement with L3. I didn't > see any table entries on the L3 San Diego looking glass for AS174. I > saw only one route on their Denver looking glass through AS7018. Does > that mean that L3 is filtering or that Cogent's announcements aren't > reaching L3 for other reasons? The former is probably correct, but > that's not something that can be easily demonstrated. I couldn't find > a looking glass in AS174 which would allow me to see Cogent's tables > from the inside. Cogent does appear to be announcing their Verio link > to other peers, however. I see direct announcements for AS174 and an > announcement for Sprint->Verio->Cogent, but not an AT&T->Cogent path. > > I think that both carriers are at fault. Both companies should have > resolved this before it came to reducing connectivity for their > customers. They both should be held accountable by their customers. I > replied to your original post, Tom, because Cogent made a public > statement which directly contradicted yours and I thought that people > on the list should have a more complete story [1]. You could be > entirely correct about there having been a contract violation. I am > confident that a considerable amount of money will be wasted trying to > determine that. > > I fear that because of the the popularity of this issue it will reach > the ears of the less clueful xEOs at carrier organizations and
Re: [WISPA] MRTG
I find bits to be more useful simply because we sell packages based around bits (1.5Mbit, 3Mbit, 10Mbit, etc). Graphing in bits lets me look at the graphs and quickly determine the amount of throughput a given user or link is getting in relation to what I sold them. If it were graphed in bytes I would have to think about it for a minute and do some math. -- Aubrey Wells AirInfinite [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Ok, so I have got it working. Should I graph bytes or bits? Brian -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] dual band
highest gain i've seen on dual-band is the superpass ones. http://www.superpass.com/DUAL-GJ.html --- Aubrey Wells AirInfinite [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 robert maier wrote: I've only heard of dual polorized, but could be wrong, we order those from Maxrad */[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote: I'm looking for a dual band high gain panel antenna (ie: 2.4ghz and 5ghz 19db+) - does such a beast exist? Thanks Dan -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: 12/23/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/charity/*http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/> -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] dual band
I was told by superpass that they are dual, thats the only reason we bought them. the "either/or" ones are the single jack ones, the dual-jack ones are dual-band. --- Aubrey Wells AirInfinite [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 Rick Smith wrote: They're not really "dual" they're "either/or". One panel to do BOTH would be awesome, but for now nothing of the sort exists, save for the dual-pol dishes for use with orthogon, etc... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aubrey Wells Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 3:30 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] dual band highest gain i've seen on dual-band is the superpass ones. http://www.superpass.com/DUAL-GJ.html --- Aubrey Wells AirInfinite [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 robert maier wrote: I've only heard of dual polorized, but could be wrong, we order those from Maxrad */[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote: I'm looking for a dual band high gain panel antenna (ie: 2.4ghz and 5ghz 19db+) - does such a beast exist? Thanks Dan -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: 12/23/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- -- Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/charity/*http://brand.yahoo.c om/cybergivingweek2005/> -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: 12/23/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Getting Mikrotik onto a CF
I have the .img file for 2.9.27. I contacted Mikrotik customer support and was told to "use net install" because there isnt a CF image for the new version. I can send the .img file if you want. --- Aubrey Wells One Ring Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED] o: (404) 601.1407 f: (404) 601.1408 c: (770) 356.9767 Mark McElvy wrote: I would like to do some testing w/ Mikrotik and need help putting it onto a CF card that will get installed onto a WRAP board. All I can find is an ISO file. Mark Mark McElvy AccuBak Data Systems, Inc. 573.729.9200 - Office 573.729.9203 - Fax 573.247.9980 - Mobile http://www.accubak.com/ http://www.accubak.net/ Nationwide Internet Access Accurate backups for your critical data! -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
