Re: [WISPA] UBNT RocketAC spotted on FCC site

http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Rocket-M5-AC-Lite/m-p/900726#U900726 On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, wrote: > I saw that as well. But again, if this is the "Lite" product, is there a > higher level product to come, perhaps with GPS? > > Daniel Mullen > ISN Inc. > > Josh L

Re: [WISPA] UBNT RocketAC spotted on FCC site

> in which Ben totally skipped over answering it... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Matt Hardy wrote: > >> >> http://community.ubnt

Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link

It actually does take into account terrain data... Let us know if you have any other questions or suggestions for improvement. -Matt On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:29 -0700, 3-dB Networks wrote: > One thing I have noticed... it does not take into account multipath, or > really anything else dealing wit

Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:35 -0700, 3-dB Networks wrote: > I must have missed the day Ligowave announced 11GHz can go through mountains > :-) > LOL... most 11GHz can't, only LigoWave. ;) We'll look into this and see what's going on with this link. > Your calculator gives no indication of diffract

Re: [WISPA] deliberant/ligowave

s an extension to the 802.11 MIB for standards based stats (receive signal level, noise level, etc). Best Regards,  Matt Hardy LigoWave WISPA Wants You!

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

What type of VPN are you using? Some allow publishing or advertising of routes to the client when the VPN is established On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 10:59 -0800, Charles Wyble wrote: > Mike Hammett wrote: > > Is there a way to setup Vista so that only certain subnets are routed over > > a VPN link? I

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

:08 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote: > PPTP VPN connection. > > I'll see what is supported in this regard. > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > ------ > From:

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65

We put together a wiki entry for our customers that explains the entire process of 3.65GHz licensing, from applying for an FRN number, to obtaining a nationwide license, to registering each site location. Maybe this will help some of you guys too: http://ligowave.com/wiki/index.php/LigoWave_3.65G

Re: [WISPA] domain spam attack - JoeJob

You can implement the use of SPF records in your dns/mx settings. This will tell mail servers which use SPF checking (which many do) to only allow mail from your domain name to come from the mail servers / IPs that you specify (in the SPF records) are allowed. Any mail coming from non-allowed IPs a

Re: [WISPA] domain spam attack - JoeJob

led > spam checks or something like that. > > Nick Olsen > Brevard Wireless > (321) 205-1100 x106 > > > ---- > > From: "Matt Hardy" > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:08 AM > To: "WISPA General List&quo

Re: [WISPA] OT - Glad I Didn't Buy an iPhone

There are quite a few Android based devices : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Android_devices I think I even saw a netbook yesterday that came preloaded with Android and XP setup in a dual-boot configuration. I had the G1 on TMobile, now have the HTC Hero. I've been happy with both, but now

Re: [WISPA] OT - Glad I Didn't Buy an iPhone

Hmm, nevermind I see the HTC emblem on the back of the phone on the website now. Another Android based HTC phone... The specs are interesting though. On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 19:26 -0500, Matt Hardy wrote: > now I'm intrigued by the actual "Google Phone" made my > Google :) >

Re: [WISPA] Mesh just for kicks

I think you're thinking of the MIT Roofnet project? http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/roofnet/doku.php :) Scottie Arnett wrote: > I was thinking of something else...can't remember what is was called. A > college was replacing the firmware in some Netgear WGR614L(best I recall) > routers and meshing the

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

Yes for the 3.65GHz band, antenna gain does matter, because the band is EIRP restricted. For instance, for the XR3, if you look on the grant: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/Eas731GrantForm.cfm?mode=COPY&RequestTimeout=500&application_id=930658&fcc_id=SWX-XR3B The maximum output (in

Re: [WISPA] email black lists

It could be senderbase: http://www.senderbase.org/senderbase_queries/detailip?search_string=64.146.146.8 Have you checked your smtp logs for more detailed information? -Matt Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > Hi All, > > We had a customer get a virus and it took us a couple of days to find out > who i

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Router

Yes you can setup this feature in the Routes section for failover, you can create two routes with different Distances and have the lower distance route use the Check Gateway ping feature. If it quits pinging it will switch to the route with the higher distance setting. As far as load balancing, y

Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?

gt; > optimistic side, or talking best case lab testing. > > > > What I will say is, Ligo was my winner for best "Hardware" package. They > > make it solid, from case, to MB, to Pigtail. > > > > Tom DeReggi > > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc &g

Re: [WISPA] Voip over Wireless

If you're looking at implementing VoIP with a system that's standards based, I'd try to find something that utilizes the Atheros Super G capabilities (WMM, Packet Bursting, Compression, Fast Frames). These can really help with VoiP in two main ways: WMM - A subset of 802.11e (QoS). Prioritizes d

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

I guess one question would be is it a Layer 2 or Layer 3 mesh? That would influence what options you have. -Matt On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:43 -0700, Rogelio wrote: > Rogelio wrote: > > I would like roaming, actually. Ideally, the entire mesh would be on > > the same LAN subnet and each user w

Re: [WISPA] XR9 separation from other 2.4 stuff

We've also collocated 2.4GHz and 900MHz radios using 2.4GHz frequency up/down converters in the same enclosure before without issues. The 900MHz radios implemented with the up/down converters have pretty good filters that block non-900MHz frequencies. On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 16:15 -0400, Leon D.

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

, ARP entries updated, etc For instance, if a laptop migrates from one mesh AP to a different mesh AP in L3, they will be assigned an IP in a different subnet, while with a Layer 2 mesh, they can use the same IP. -Matt On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 10:08 -0700, Charles N Wyble wrote: > Rogelio wrote:

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 20:52 -0400, Matt Hardy wrote: > Yes a layer 2 mesh is protocol dependent, so you're stuck to IP traffic > only. Oops... i mean, Layer 3 is protocol dependent :) > Also, when using a layer 3 mesh, roaming and convergence time can also > increase (sl

Re: [WISPA] multiple gateway question in mesh scenario

weak at layer 2 of any size.. > > -Clint Ricker > > On Jun 15, 2008, at 21:00, Matt Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 20:52 -0400, Matt Hardy wrote: > > > >> Yes a layer 2 mesh is protocol dependent, so you're st

Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtP equipment

Hi Randy, Yes, the LigoWave 900MHz products are all FCC certified. -Matt On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:26 -0600, Randy Cosby wrote: > Is their 900 mhz stuff fcc certified? > > Randy > > > Bo Ring wrote: > > LigoWave is planning one, but has not announced any details. This is > > from their websi

Re: [WISPA] theoretical mesh limits?

When you say dual radio... are you saying two radios devoted to the mesh layer, or one radio devoted to meshing and one devoted to client access? We have found in our tests that when two radios are devoted to meshing the results are a little higher than your results below. One test reports: GW -

Re: [WISPA] VPN

It sounds like a NAT issue to me... have you tried enabling GRE/PPTP/etc NAT helpers? http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Services#Service_Ports (Assuming you're using Mikrotik?) On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Jeremie Chism wr

Re: [WISPA] no net but ping works

I agree... sounds like an arp issue. You don't happen to have two client bridges before this ap do you? If so you probably have customers battling each other in the arpnat tables. For instance one client starts pinging, other client stops working. Other client starts pinging, first stops working. D