Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

[Jan Van Kort]

I think you're dreaming about republican appointees.  The only thing 
they respect is the gratuities from big-business.  Bribes used to be 
illegal, maybe if we all donate to wispa, wispa could bend their ear by 
donating to their favorite charity, often.



On 2017-12-06 03:48 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:

CBRS won’t be in the 2.6-2.7 band.

To answer the other question - yes, I do think we can make a 
difference here.   There are 5 commissioners and the vote currently is 
two against the NPRM, one for the NPRM, and two on the fence.  We only 
need to sway one of the two.   When we talk to Representative and 
Senators about this we have found very few who are aware of the issue. 
 When we discuss it with them so far all have been opposed to selling 
this spectrum exclusively to the cell companies.


The social media pressure helps to get their attention.

Mark


On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net 
<mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:


CBRS? is there any wisp equipment available in the 2.6-2.7Mhz band?  
Do you really think a Verizon schill in charge of the FCC is going to 
give a crap about what the citizens/tax-payers need or want?  The 
only thing he might respect is a law-suit.  Protests would only help 
him laugh.



On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort 
into the same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given posting 
is on.


I sent it to members just now.

Mark

On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Rick Harnish <rick.harn...@baicells.com 
<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>> wrote:


Mark,
Just curious, why was this not posted 
tomemb...@wispa.org<mailto:memb...@wispa.org>. My experience tells 
me that this list is not populated with near as many people as the 
members list is.

Respectfully,
--
Rick Harnish
**
Director of WISP Markets
Baicells Technologies North America, Inc.<https://na.baicells.com/>
Mobile: (972) 922-1443
rick.harn...@baicells.com<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>
www.facebook.com/baicells<http://www.facebook.com/baicells>
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*On 
Behalf Of*Mark Radabaugh

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM
*To:*WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org 
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, 
TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS 
spectrum
The feedback we are getting back from DC is that certain parties at 
the FCC noticed our #CBRS tags but didn’t think it was getting much 
traction.    So… time to ramp it up.

Mark


On Dec 6, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matt Hoppes 
<mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net 
<mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
Do you really think this is going to do anything though? It's very 
easy to post something like this on Facebook, but I feel like it 
really doesn't have any actual affect.


Kind of like some of the protesters we've seen in recent months 
and years where you have to ask yourself it's great that you have 
an opinion but is your protest really doing anything.



On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net 
<mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:


*You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and 
wanted to do something about it.   NOW IS THE TIME, and very few 
of you are participating. Please follow the instructions below. *
This isn’t that difficult.  If you can’t figure it out, ask the 
youngest person on your staff.
The FCC is laughing at us - they know they sucked all the air out 
of the room with Network Neutrality and they intentionally timed 
the publication and comment deadlines for CBRS to bury them in 
the NN controversy and the holidays. And it’s working for them.
*PLEASE post comments on your business and/or personal accounts 
on Twitter, Facebook, and/or LinkedIn in support of CBRS. *


1) *Be part of our Twitter campaign:* Take a clear picture of a 
rural or small-town location near you that could be better served 
with fixed wireless and CBRS spectrum. Upload it to your social 
media account with language like the following. Be sure to tag 
WISPA, your Members of Congress, and the White House.


Please keep it professional and /do not/ /criticize /any FCC 
commissioners or other government officials; we need their 
support! You can identify your Members of Congress by visiting 
www.House.gov <http://www.house.gov/> or www.Senate.gov 
<http://www.senate.gov/>, and their social media links will be 
listed on their websites.

/Twitter (no more than 280 characters):/
Dear @FCC: Here’s another area at risk of never getting broadband 
service if you change the #CBRS rules to favor big mobile 
carriers. Insert rural photo https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your 
member of Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

[Jan Van Kort]

no more 10-40?  Sorry, don't know about part 90, who's been doing the 
informing anyway?  Could that be why only 10 people seem to know about this?



On 2017-12-06 03:41 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:

currently only 3.65-3.7GHz is available to use under part 90.

CBRS opens up an additional 100MHz from 3.55-3.65GHz and changes the 
3.65-3.7GHz from part 90 to CBRS


The "citizens band” naming of CBRS is a poorly chosen name by the FCC 
and has nothing to do with the old “trucker” CB band.



*Sean Heskett*
*
*
*ZIRKEL Wireless *
*/High-Speed Internet/ for NW Colorado*
970-871-8500 x100 - Office
970-846-8065 - mobile
866-903-4628 - Fax
Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook 
<http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless>


On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net 
<mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:


I use that now, where does CBRS get tied to 3.6 equipment?  I read 
the fcc blurb on cbrs and they didn't cover 3.6, only mentioned cb 
radios and 40 channels.  Didn't know anybody still used that stuff, 
grew out of that 40 years ago.



On 2017-12-06 03:05 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:

CBRS is the 3.55-3.7GHz band (not 2.6-2.7)

and yes there’s lots of equipment ready to use the band.  cambium 
canopy and all the LTE vendors have product.


*Sean Heskett*
*
*
*ZIRKEL Wireless *
*/High-Speed Internet/ for NW Colorado*
970-871-8500 x100 - Office
970-846-8065 - mobile
866-903-4628 - Fax
Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook 
<http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless>


On Dec 6, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Jan Van Kort 
<j.vank...@oregononline.net <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:


CBRS? is there any wisp equipment available in the 2.6-2.7Mhz 
band?  Do you really think a Verizon schill in charge of the FCC is 
going to give a crap about what the citizens/tax-payers need or 
want?  The only thing he might respect is a law-suit.  Protests 
would only help him laugh.



On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort 
into the same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given 
posting is on.


I sent it to members just now.

Mark

On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Rick Harnish 
<rick.harn...@baicells.com <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>> wrote:


Mark,
Just curious, why was this not posted 
tomemb...@wispa.org<mailto:memb...@wispa.org>.  My experience 
tells me that this list is not populated with near as many people 
as the members list is.

Respectfully,
--
Rick Harnish
**
Director of WISP Markets
Baicells Technologies North America, Inc.<https://na.baicells.com/>
Mobile: (972) 922-1443
rick.harn...@baicells.com<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>
www.facebook.com/baicells<http://www.facebook.com/baicells>
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*On 
Behalf Of*Mark Radabaugh

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM
*To:*WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org 
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, 
TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS 
spectrum
The feedback we are getting back from DC is that certain parties 
at the FCC noticed our #CBRS tags but didn’t think it was getting 
much traction.  So… time to ramp it up.

Mark


On Dec 6, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matt Hoppes 
<mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net 
<mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
Do you really think this is going to do anything though? It's 
very easy to post something like this on Facebook, but I feel 
like it really doesn't have any actual affect.


Kind of like some of the protesters we've seen in recent months 
and years where you have to ask yourself it's great that you 
have an opinion but is your protest really doing anything.



On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net 
<mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:


*You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and 
wanted to do something about it. NOW IS THE TIME, and very few 
of you are participating.   Please follow the instructions below. *
This isn’t that difficult.  If you can’t figure it out, ask the 
youngest person on your staff.
The FCC is laughing at us - they know they sucked all the air 
out of the room with Network Neutrality and they intentionally 
timed the publication and comment deadlines for CBRS to bury 
them in the NN controversy and the holidays. And it’s working 
for them.
*PLEASE post comments on your business and/or personal accounts 
on Twitter, Facebook, and/or LinkedIn in support of CBRS. *


1) *Be part of our Twitter campaign:* Take a clear picture of a 
rural or small-town location near you that could be better 
served with fixed wireless and CBRS spectrum. Upload it to your 
social media account with language like the following. B

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

[Jan Van Kort]

I use that now, where does CBRS get tied to 3.6 equipment?  I read the 
fcc blurb on cbrs and they didn't cover 3.6, only mentioned cb radios 
and 40 channels.  Didn't know anybody still used that stuff, grew out of 
that 40 years ago.



On 2017-12-06 03:05 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:

CBRS is the 3.55-3.7GHz band (not 2.6-2.7)

and yes there’s lots of equipment ready to use the band.  cambium 
canopy and all the LTE vendors have product.


*Sean Heskett*
*
*
*ZIRKEL Wireless *
*/High-Speed Internet/ for NW Colorado*
970-871-8500 x100 - Office
970-846-8065 - mobile
866-903-4628 - Fax
Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook 
<http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless>


On Dec 6, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net 
<mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:


CBRS? is there any wisp equipment available in the 2.6-2.7Mhz band?  
Do you really think a Verizon schill in charge of the FCC is going to 
give a crap about what the citizens/tax-payers need or want?  The 
only thing he might respect is a law-suit.  Protests would only help 
him laugh.



On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort 
into the same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given posting 
is on.


I sent it to members just now.

Mark

On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Rick Harnish <rick.harn...@baicells.com 
<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>> wrote:


Mark,
Just curious, why was this not posted 
tomemb...@wispa.org<mailto:memb...@wispa.org>. My experience tells 
me that this list is not populated with near as many people as the 
members list is.

Respectfully,
--
Rick Harnish
**
Director of WISP Markets
Baicells Technologies North America, Inc.<https://na.baicells.com/>
Mobile: (972) 922-1443
rick.harn...@baicells.com<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>
www.facebook.com/baicells<http://www.facebook.com/baicells>
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*On 
Behalf Of*Mark Radabaugh

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM
*To:*WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org 
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, 
TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS 
spectrum
The feedback we are getting back from DC is that certain parties at 
the FCC noticed our #CBRS tags but didn’t think it was getting much 
traction.    So… time to ramp it up.

Mark


On Dec 6, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matt Hoppes 
<mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net 
<mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
Do you really think this is going to do anything though? It's very 
easy to post something like this on Facebook, but I feel like it 
really doesn't have any actual affect.


Kind of like some of the protesters we've seen in recent months 
and years where you have to ask yourself it's great that you have 
an opinion but is your protest really doing anything.



On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net 
<mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:


*You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and 
wanted to do something about it.   NOW IS THE TIME, and very few 
of you are participating. Please follow the instructions below. *
This isn’t that difficult.  If you can’t figure it out, ask the 
youngest person on your staff.
The FCC is laughing at us - they know they sucked all the air out 
of the room with Network Neutrality and they intentionally timed 
the publication and comment deadlines for CBRS to bury them in 
the NN controversy and the holidays. And it’s working for them.
*PLEASE post comments on your business and/or personal accounts 
on Twitter, Facebook, and/or LinkedIn in support of CBRS. *


1) *Be part of our Twitter campaign:* Take a clear picture of a 
rural or small-town location near you that could be better served 
with fixed wireless and CBRS spectrum. Upload it to your social 
media account with language like the following. Be sure to tag 
WISPA, your Members of Congress, and the White House.


Please keep it professional and /do not/ /criticize /any FCC 
commissioners or other government officials; we need their 
support! You can identify your Members of Congress by visiting 
www.House.gov <http://www.house.gov/> or www.Senate.gov 
<http://www.senate.gov/>, and their social media links will be 
listed on their websites.

/Twitter (no more than 280 characters):/
Dear @FCC: Here’s another area at risk of never getting broadband 
service if you change the #CBRS rules to favor big mobile 
carriers. Insert rural photo https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your 
member of Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Calling all WISPA members, WISP customers, and allies: Help us 
tell @FCC that the current #CBRS rules are helping to close the 
rural broadband gap and should not be tinkered 

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

[Jan Van Kort]

CBRS? is there any wisp equipment available in the 2.6-2.7Mhz band?  Do 
you really think a Verizon schill in charge of the FCC is going to give 
a crap about what the citizens/tax-payers need or want?  The only thing 
he might respect is a law-suit.  Protests would only help him laugh.



On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort 
into the same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given posting 
is on.


I sent it to members just now.

Mark

On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Rick Harnish > wrote:


Mark,
Just curious, why was this not posted 
tomemb...@wispa.org.  My experience tells 
me that this list is not populated with near as many people as the 
members list is.

Respectfully,
--
Rick Harnish
**
Director of WISP Markets
Baicells Technologies North America, Inc.
Mobile: (972) 922-1443
rick.harn...@baicells.com
www.facebook.com/baicells
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*On 
Behalf Of*Mark Radabaugh

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM
*To:*WISPA General List >
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, 
and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum
The feedback we are getting back from DC is that certain parties at 
the FCC noticed our #CBRS tags but didn’t think it was getting much 
traction.  So… time to ramp it up.

Mark


On Dec 6, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matt Hoppes 
> wrote:
Do you really think this is going to do anything though? It's very 
easy to post something like this on Facebook, but I feel like it 
really doesn't have any actual affect.


Kind of like some of the protesters we've seen in recent months and 
years where you have to ask yourself it's great that you have an 
opinion but is your protest really doing anything.



On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh > wrote:


*You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and 
wanted to do something about it.   NOW IS THE TIME, and very few of 
you are participating.   Please follow the instructions below. *
This isn’t that difficult.  If you can’t figure it out, ask the 
youngest person on your staff.
The FCC is laughing at us - they know they sucked all the air out 
of the room with Network Neutrality and they intentionally timed 
the publication and comment deadlines for CBRS to bury them in the 
NN controversy and the holidays. And it’s working for them.
*PLEASE post comments on your business and/or personal accounts on 
Twitter, Facebook, and/or LinkedIn in support of CBRS. *


1) *Be part of our Twitter campaign:* Take a clear picture of a 
rural or small-town location near you that could be better served 
with fixed wireless and CBRS spectrum. Upload it to your social 
media account with language like the following. Be sure to tag 
WISPA, your Members of Congress, and the White House.


Please keep it professional and /do not/ /criticize /any FCC 
commissioners or other government officials; we need their support! 
You can identify your Members of Congress by visiting www.House.gov 
 or www.Senate.gov , 
and their social media links will be listed on their websites.

/Twitter (no more than 280 characters):/
Dear @FCC: Here’s another area at risk of never getting broadband 
service if you change the #CBRS rules to favor big mobile carriers. 
Insert rural photo https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your member of 
Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Calling all WISPA members, WISP customers, and allies: Help us tell 
@FCC that the current #CBRS rules are helping to close the rural 
broadband gap and should not be tinkered with! 
https://goo.gl/TKczyK[insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name 
here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Dear @FCC: Don’t sink our hopes for rural broadband; keep the #CBRS 
rules! https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your member of Congress’s 
Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Attention @FCC: Don't take away rural consumers' best hope for 
finally closing the broadband gap! Keep the #CBRS 
 rules! 
https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter 
name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Hey @FCC -- Don’t leave rural areas behind by changing the #CBRS 
rules to favor the big mobile companies! https://goo.gl/TKczyK 
[insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse 
@WISPANews
In the #CBRS  spectrum 
band, census-tract-sized PAL licenses are crucial for bringing 
broadband internet to rural 

Re: [WISPA] [Wisp] Loss of David Kunat

[Jan Van Kort]

Somebody survived that crash?  People on the ground were true heroes!  
Amazing!  Very sorry for the victims families, this is tough tragic news.



On 2017-05-30 10:40 AM, Jeremy Austin wrote:
Some may find the images graphic in the article below. It is the story 
of the rescue of the sole survivor in the crash that claimed two lives.


https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2017/05/29/survivor-of-fatal-plane-crash-rescued-by-local-residents-as-water-rose/



On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Chuck Hogg via WISP > wrote:


Oh Wow.  David will be missed.

Regards,
Chuck

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Richard Bernhardt
> wrote:

Very sincere condolences for the loss of David Kunat.  
Prayers for his family and friends.  Very sad indeed.   -

Richard Bernhardt

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Jeremy Austin
> wrote:

I am sorry to report the loss of young Alaskan pilot and
WISP operator David Kunat, also a frequent contributor to
this list, in a crash today.


https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/aviation/2017/05/27/two-dead-in-southeast-alaska-plane-crash/



He will be missed.

Jeremy Austin

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
WISP mailing list
w...@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wisp





--
Jeremy Austin

(907) 895-2311 office
(907) 803-5422 cell
jhaus...@gmail.com 

Heritage NetWorks
Whitestone Power & Communications
Vertical Broadband, LLC


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Can anyone service Oxford, NC

[Jan Van Kort]

not if I have to fly on United


On 17-04-13 02:57 PM, Marco Coelho wrote:

Looking for 30x30M 2 year contract
here:
200 Certainteed Road
Oxford, NC 27565-3597

--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless