no more 10-40? Sorry, don't know about part 90, who's been doing the
informing anyway? Could that be why only 10 people seem to know about this?
On 2017-12-06 03:41 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
currently only 3.65-3.7GHz is available to use under part 90.
CBRS opens up an additional 100MHz from 3.55-3.65GHz and changes the
3.65-3.7GHz from part 90 to CBRS
The "citizens band” naming of CBRS is a poorly chosen name by the FCC
and has nothing to do with the old “trucker” CB band.
*Sean Heskett*
*
*
*ZIRKEL Wireless *
*/High-Speed Internet/ for NW Colorado*
970-871-8500 x100 - Office
970-846-8065 - mobile
866-903-4628 - Fax
Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless>
On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Jan Van Kort <j.vank...@oregononline.net
<mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:
I use that now, where does CBRS get tied to 3.6 equipment? I read
the fcc blurb on cbrs and they didn't cover 3.6, only mentioned cb
radios and 40 channels. Didn't know anybody still used that stuff,
grew out of that 40 years ago.
On 2017-12-06 03:05 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
CBRS is the 3.55-3.7GHz band (not 2.6-2.7)
and yes there’s lots of equipment ready to use the band. cambium
canopy and all the LTE vendors have product.
*Sean Heskett*
*
*
*ZIRKEL Wireless *
*/High-Speed Internet/ for NW Colorado*
970-871-8500 x100 - Office
970-846-8065 - mobile
866-903-4628 - Fax
Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless>
On Dec 6, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Jan Van Kort
<j.vank...@oregononline.net <mailto:j.vank...@oregononline.net>> wrote:
CBRS? is there any wisp equipment available in the 2.6-2.7Mhz
band? Do you really think a Verizon schill in charge of the FCC is
going to give a crap about what the citizens/tax-payers need or
want? The only thing he might respect is a law-suit. Protests
would only help him laugh.
On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort
into the same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given
posting is on.
I sent it to members just now.
Mark
On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Rick Harnish
<rick.harn...@baicells.com <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>> wrote:
Mark,
Just curious, why was this not posted
tomemb...@wispa.org<mailto:memb...@wispa.org>. My experience
tells me that this list is not populated with near as many people
as the members list is.
Respectfully,
---------<image002.png>---------
Rick Harnish
**
Director of WISP Markets
Baicells Technologies North America, Inc.<https://na.baicells.com/>
Mobile: (972) 922-1443
rick.harn...@baicells.com<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com>
www.facebook.com/baicells<http://www.facebook.com/baicells>
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*On
Behalf Of*Mark Radabaugh
*Sent:*Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM
*To:*WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org
<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY,
TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS
spectrum
The feedback we are getting back from DC is that certain parties
at the FCC noticed our #CBRS tags but didn’t think it was getting
much traction. So… time to ramp it up.
Mark
On Dec 6, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matt Hoppes
<mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
<mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
Do you really think this is going to do anything though? It's
very easy to post something like this on Facebook, but I feel
like it really doesn't have any actual affect.
Kind of like some of the protesters we've seen in recent months
and years where you have to ask yourself it's great that you
have an opinion but is your protest really doing anything.
On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net
<mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:
*You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and
wanted to do something about it. NOW IS THE TIME, and very few
of you are participating. Please follow the instructions below. *
This isn’t that difficult. If you can’t figure it out, ask the
youngest person on your staff.
The FCC is laughing at us - they know they sucked all the air
out of the room with Network Neutrality and they intentionally
timed the publication and comment deadlines for CBRS to bury
them in the NN controversy and the holidays. And it’s working
for them.
*PLEASE post comments on your business and/or personal accounts
on Twitter, Facebook, and/or LinkedIn in support of CBRS. *
1) *Be part of our Twitter campaign:* Take a clear picture of a
rural or small-town location near you that could be better
served with fixed wireless and CBRS spectrum. Upload it to your
social media account with language like the following. Be sure
to tag WISPA, your Members of Congress, and the White House.
Please keep it professional and /do not/ /criticize /any FCC
commissioners or other government officials; we need their
support! You can identify your Members of Congress by visiting
www.House.gov <http://www.house.gov/> or www.Senate.gov
<http://www.senate.gov/>, and their social media links will be
listed on their websites.
/Twitter (no more than 280 characters):/
Dear @FCC: Here’s another area at risk of never getting
broadband service if you change the #CBRS rules to favor big
mobile carriers. Insert rural photo https://goo.gl/TKczyK
[insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name
here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Calling all WISPA members, WISP customers, and allies: Help us
tell @FCC that the current #CBRS rules are helping to close the
rural broadband gap and should not be tinkered with!
https://goo.gl/TKczyK[insert your member of Congress’s Twitter
name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Dear @FCC: Don’t sink our hopes for rural broadband; keep the
#CBRS rules! https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your member of
Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Attention @FCC: Don't take away rural consumers' best hope for
finally closing the broadband gap! Keep the #CBRS
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/CBRS?src=hash> rules!
https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter
name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
Hey @FCC -- Don’t leave rural areas behind by changing the
#CBRS rules to favor the big mobile companies!
https://goo.gl/TKczyK [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter
name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
In the #CBRS
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/CBRS?src=hash> spectrum band,
census-tract-sized PAL licenses are crucial for bringing
broadband internet to rural customers. https://goo.gl/TKczyK
[insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name
here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews @FCC
/Facebook and LinkedIn:/
Dear @FCC: Don’t leave rural areas like mine behind by changing
the #CBRS rules to favor the big mobile companies!
@Your-member-of-Congress: Please let FCC know your views! More
info at WISPA.org <http://wispa.org/>: https://goo.gl/TKczyK
Any of the above options will work as well.
2) *The “easy way”:* Follow WISPA on these networks, watch for
our posts, and then “like,” “retweet,” “share,” etc. We will be
using the hashtag #CBRS.
**
**
3) Down the road, we will ask you to contact your U.S. House
and U.S. Senate members; be prepared to draft your company’s
official comments to the FCC; and sign on to WISPA’s industry
letters to the FCC and/or Congress. Stay tuned!
**
*FOR MORE INFORMATION: *
· Jimmy Carr, Chair of WISPA’s Legislative Committee,
jc...@wispa.org <mailto:jc...@wispa.org>
· Mark Radabaugh, Chair of WISPA’s FCC Committee,
m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net>
Mark Radabaugh
WISPA FCC Committee Chair
fcc_ch...@wispa.org <mailto:fcc_ch...@wispa.org>
419-261-5996
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless