uting Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:20 PM
To: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Yep. Thats why many folks use a lower gain for their sectors and omnis.
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
>
16dB by 120* won't have much of a vertical pattern will it? I'd guess less
than 10*.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theor
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
> I would say that -90 should be a safe signal
> level to use and still have good modulation rates.
I'm a li
Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
>
No but they will be about 20 feet high for an H pol 600 MHz slotted
waveguide 16 dBi 120 degree sector.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theo
there again. We need to show them pictures of our areas,
> demographics, screen shots of all of the wifi devices we pick up at our
> ap's. etc. etc. etc.
>
> Pretty cool.
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTEC
, November 05, 2008 8:50 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
> Hmmm
>
> Just for fun I ran the numbers at 600mhz.
>
> 20 dB tx from the radio, 16dB tx antenna (probably not at all reasonable
> due
> to size and small 50ish* cove
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:12 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
> Based on TV antenna, it looks like the largest gain CPE will be around 10
> dB for all but the lowest of frequen
rom reusing that same
spectrum.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hammett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
I chose -80 because in current o
should be able to receive
signals that are -113 dBm.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:20 AM
To: "WISPA G
required to receive a DTV signal.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:12 AM
To: WISPA List
Subject: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
Based on TV antenna, it looks
Based on TV antenna, it looks like the largest gain CPE will be around 10 dB
for all but the lowest of frequencies.
I just ran a Radio Mobile coverage area using a guesstimate at a white spaces
system... EIRP of 20 dBm, 16 dBi sector, 10 dBi CPE, -80 dBm minimum allowed
receive. The range was
13 matches
Mail list logo
