ock solid for me.
. . . j o n a t h a n
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 1:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Google's WIFI- San Francisco
Jonathan Schmidt wrote:
> I understand that G
I downloaded the client, and was most interested to see the tagline in the "About" window:
Tunc tua res agitur,
Paries cum proximus ardet.
Which my extensive training in classical Latin interprets as:
Then your property is in danger,
when the nearest wall is burning.
I'd definitely take tha
Jonathan Schmidt wrote:
> I understand that GOOGLE has a proprietary piece of client software.
> Perhaps it's secured.
Are you thinking of the stuff that was (very briefly) available from
wifi.google.com, or something else?
(Note: The above URL now just redirects to the g00gle home page, but the
WISPA] Google's WIFI- San Francisco
Imagine a network sniffer on the world's largest, free wifi network...
Then imagine more networks - NYC - Atlanta, Dallas, Miami, Chicago, Denver,
Etc...
Then imagine where all those sniffed bits go...yep...you guessed it, a
database...
Then g
How much would it hurt the SBCs and Comcasts if Google takes over in the
big cities? Does SBC get a lot of money from these big markets?
Brian
George wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051001/ap_on_hi_te/google_wireless_internet
So what is the deal here?
Do the local wisps just get hammere
Imagine a network sniffer on the world's largest, free wifi network...
Then imagine more networks - NYC - Atlanta, Dallas, Miami, Chicago, Denver,
Etc...
Then imagine where all those sniffed bits go...yep...you guessed it, a
database...
Then guess where they determine what the most popular se
