Regarding Saf technika All-ODU, thought it was interesting to note the
following from the spec sheet
a.. Jumbo frame size supports up to 9728 bytes, which allows using longer
header info (VLAN, MPLS) and transmitting more useful content and less
headers, thus gaining on total throughput.
on, Trango fit beautifully, and Dragonwave didn't.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Steven G McGehee"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISP
"WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz BH comparison-
Tehnika. I also would have to suggest 3db. You just turn to them
when you need something and you get it.
On 2/12/10, Randy Cosby wrote:
> Luke,
>
> You might also want to take
ssage -
From: "Randy Cosby"
To: ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz BH comparison-
> The one I have up works fine. There are quirks in the firmware, but no
> show-stoppers. Inband management is still a wo
Tehnika. I also would have to suggest 3db. You just turn to them
when you need something and you get it.
On 2/12/10, Randy Cosby wrote:
> Luke,
>
> You might also want to take a look at the SAF Teknica (sp?) 11Ghz links.
> I think there are a couple distributors who sell them now, including
> 3
Luke,
You might also want to take a look at the SAF Teknica (sp?) 11Ghz links.
I think there are a couple distributors who sell them now, including
3-db.net. They are very big in Europe and many other countries, and I
believe a couple people on the list have some and are quite happy with
them
I really appreciate the responses!
We have 18 pair of the DWs and they are pretty solid for the most part
for us with the exception of 6 returns (one was an immediate return of
a return) thus far for failing transmitters. A couple were about 2-3
months after deployment and a few were about 1yr af
greater detail. I'd like to bend your ear a bit on a couple questions I
>>> have regarding a DragonWave all ODU radio set we recently inherited. Not
>>> sure if we should just punt it on EBay or possibly deploy it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
&
deploy it.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:39 PM
>> To: lp.
deploy it.
>
> Best,
>
>
> Brad
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:39 PM
> To: lp...@essex1.com; WISPA General List
> Subject: R
I agree with Randy, definitely some quirks in the firmware, although
I've been told by them that v1.23 is in the works. In terms of actual
performance, assuming a solid deployment, etc., the Apexes work great.
We have several DW in 11Ghz as well, which in comparison have given us
zero problem.
ral List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz BH comparison-
The one I have up works fine. There are quirks in the firmware, but no
show-stoppers. Inband management is still a work in progress. Don't
particularly care for the fiber port cover design, but if you're using
copper, it's fine
The one I have up works fine. There are quirks in the firmware, but no
show-stoppers. Inband management is still a work in progress. Don't
particularly care for the fiber port cover design, but if you're using
copper, it's fine (unless you use extra-large / heavy ethernet that may
not fit).
13 matches
Mail list logo
