Tom,
I currently have several Pac Wireless 5.8ghz 2ft dishes running at
5.3ghz with no packet loss. Granted, the RSSI is 1-2db higher than it
should be, but they do work.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Dustin,
While I haven't done any current work with the 2 foot Gabriel
profession
Dustin,
While I haven't done any current work with the 2 foot Gabriel professional
series I've been hearing enough good stuff about it that I ordered one to
play with and see if it worth deploying.
So far I like the Gabriel antennas. However, I am starting to see a pattern
where the various r
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
Thanks, Charles and Dustin,
The challenge I'm working on is to determine if the degregation of my test
amp; Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
Tom,
Can you try changing th
--- From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
C/I,
but you also start to
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full
quot;Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more C/I,
but you also start to loose the abil
Moto/Orthogon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mario Pommier
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006
11:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16
DSSS interference
what brand?
dustin jurman wrote:
Thank you Charles, We use
ECTED]] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use
esday, February 08, 2006 9:29 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16 DSSS interference
>As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more
>C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the radio.
A small bit of trivial
>As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the radio.
A small bit of trivial regarding this issue
With higher order modulation schemes, the EVM (Error Vector Magnitude) can
be so high that even on a p
Tom,
DSSS modulation is a single-carrier modulation scheme, BPSK operates much in
the same way as DSSS which usually are much more robust then other forms of
modulation because they seem to run like a single carrier modulation
schema's.
The neat thing about BPSK is its ability to take interferen
12 matches
Mail list logo
