They can do either depending on configuration
John
Richard Munoz wrote:
I thought that these switches would deny the Source MAC Address
instead of disabling the entire port.
-Richard M.
A little more info would be good. If they want to authenticate
everyone, then 802.1x switches are a
I thought that these switches would deny the Source MAC Address instead of
disabling the entire port.
-Richard M.
A little more info would be good. If they want to authenticate everyone,
then 802.1x switches are available-if you don't authenticate, your port
turns off. If they just want to li
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
doing anything. HotSpot and PPPoE require that you have a radius
server.
Not necessarily. Some implementations, this is true, but not all.
(FWIW, the radius server DOES make management easier.)
--
Butch Evans
BPS Networks http://www.bpsnetworks
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, John Scrivner wrote:
complete report on the incident and a plan for how I will prevent
people from doing this in the future at all locations. I am
thinking we can use PPPoE to force all users even on the hardwired
network to authenticate in order to get on the Internet. Wh
John,
The concern for PPPOE is wether client sessions will re-establish
automatically after disconnects of the link.
For example, if a Pre-n BElkin router is used for a end user link, and I did
connect there service, for example by rebooting a trango AP at the cell site
or from significant pac
John Scrivner wrote:
Anyone out there have experience with PPPoE?. I have a client who is a
local government entity. They have people who have abused their
Internet connection in the past. They restrict who has Internet access
and when it can be used. One of our techs unknowingly circumvented
Is this an all Windows network?
If so, the way to do this is to use the windows VPN setup, so that all your
access to the 'net is through the VPN, not across the open ethernet.
The reason I suggest this, is that if they have a Windows based network in
place now, everything is already there, and j
John Scrivner wrote:
Anyone out there have experience with PPPoE?.
[ snip ]
Based on the scenario you've described, PPPoE may not be the best
solution. It'll probably break a lot of Windows-specific stuff (printer
and file sharing leap to mind). Those could be worked around with a
sufficien
I do not really understand what you are trying to accomplish but I do PPPoE
for my network. I have used it in a few other cases. It is fairly easy to
setup and should not limit anything on a windows network. Call me if I can
be of help
Jory Privett
WCCS
940.683.5797
- Original Message
PPPoE will break things like printers. I would use a HotSpot style
authentication and enable only the known machines. All other machines
are sent to a login page or are simply firewalled and prevented from
doing anything. HotSpot and PPPoE require that you have a radius
server.
Lonnie
On 11/30/
Our local school uses something that does what you are asking for the kids.
Check with your school.
If that doesn't work I can get you the name and number for who to ask here.
I'm pretty sure it's done via some kind of security server. Nothing so
complicated as pppoe.
BTW, I think that
How did connecting a laptop circumvent how they access the Internet? Sounds to me like the government entity does not restrict access to the Internet, they restrict what a PC can get to on the PC. Seems like a bad approach. How about a good ole proxy server that requires authentication to ge
12 matches
Mail list logo