ONLY where there are specific cases
> that make it more affordable for that specific case or location.
>
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yep, at the expense of the many for the benefit of the few, IMHO.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: RickG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:32:10 -0500
>Basically, except for a few viable installations still r
ndary BPL. HV BPL is not
>> going to be a viable backhaul technology for a variety of reasons.
>>
>> Yes, secondary BPL barely works with arguably acceptable (by some). Show
>> me
>> a HV system that works as advertised.
>> - Original Message -
&
, using the magnetic fields around the power lines
> as a containment structure for a microwave signal. Hundreds of Mbps. Lab
> oddity, but picked up by the press.
>
> Which one of these are we talking about here?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG" &
grid dip meter, SWR
> cross-needle meter, and TDR equipment that served me so well all these
> years. I run a clean shop.
>
> . . . J o n a t h a n
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
> Sent
works as advertised.
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>
>
>> Chuck,
>>
>> It's as though
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
> Chuck,
>
> It's as though you didnt read my post!
>
> BPL works - with acceptable interference - I saw it with my own eyes
> along with do
November 15, 2008 4:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant impedance to RF. Nor are
they balanced. This is like trying to pump natural gas down the water
lines.
Pipe, right? What's the problem?
It is never going to ever
ow me
a HV system that works as advertised.
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
> Chuck,
>
> It's as though you didnt
short-wave and ham if
> I decide to do so. A half baked idea like HV bpl has no place in ruining
> valuable spectrum that is absolutely necessary in the event of an emergency.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
um that is absolutely necessary in the event of an emergency.
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>I disagree. I personally saw BPL work and
ust fine.
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 1:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>
>
>> To clarify, by "real interference" I meant
about. Nothing more. On the secondary side it is nothing more than
homeplug. That is viable and deployed and does just fine.
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISP
OTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>
>
>>I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
>> building 20-30 rooms. What type
To clarify, by "real interference" I meant they are no worse than
anything else we deal with. Like any RF transmission, there are
emmisions, but those can be dealt with just like the way we (WISP's)
deal with them. The ARRL made a mountain out of molehill and it was
all political as far as I'm con
neral List'"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
> Brian,
>
> I'd rather go with this from Motorola:
> http://www.motorola.com/Business/US-EN/Business+Product+and+Services/Private
> +Broadband+Networks
>
> Basically it'
How about BPL to transport data to the ap's?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Rohrbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>I have a motel I am trying
4 AM
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
> "You are correct, electric companies saw huge benefits for internal use
> but the real reason it did not move forward was because electric companies
> are conservative by nature and they didnt like
"You are correct, electric companies saw huge benefits for internal use
but the real reason it did not move forward was because electric companies
are conservative by nature and they didnt like the heat coming from the
ARRL over interference issues, which btw were not real."
The interference is re
t presentations on
it.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with inter
fication to build out the speed needed for large scale hgih capacity
> Broadband to compete with FTTH.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net" &l
powerpoint presentations on
> it.
>
> Daniel White
> 3-dB Networks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:09 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WI
On Nov 14, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
>>I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L
>>shaped building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would
>>work for this? Or maybe wireless is the way to go.
MOST of these smaller hotels that I have dealt with have som
hi Brian,
Just curious why you wouldn't go with a wired solution? Seems like a
$200 switch and a box of Cat5 would be an easy fix. Suppose you would
want to add some wifi support to it, also. (Open-Mesh, StarOS, or
Mikrotik?)
One item I picked up from the original media article was that th
can be gotten to the rooms, it will be cheaper to
deploy.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Rohrbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:
-
From: "Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
> Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of
> yet? Maybe beam in some high sp
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would work for this?
Or maybe wireless is t
I would put up an AP.
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
> Wireless has it's obvious advantages but if you go the BPL route you
&g
Wireless has it's obvious advantages but if you go the BPL route you
can use the Motorola product. Just be sure your not going through mroe
than one distribution panel. To be honest, depending on the wiring,
you may be able to get through a couple of panels.
-RickG
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM
I have a motel I am trying to cover with internet. It's a L shaped
building 20-30 rooms. What type of bpl solutions would work for this?
Or maybe wireless is the way to go.
Brian
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
h
t; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:42 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>
> Is there and BPL solutions out there that
s, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
>
s no good.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:10 PM
>
- LinkTechs.net
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of
yet? Maybe beam in some high speed and then go to the community or
subdivision
gt;> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:10 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Subject: Re: [WI
as another competitor to add choice and options for consumers.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:
yeah, BPL is no good.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:10 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WI
When I was involved with BPL (back then known as PLC), all I ever
heard was HAM radio interference.
-RickG
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Jeff Broadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081112/tec_broadband_over_power_lines.html?.v=6
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> Sales Manager, ImageS
38 matches
Mail list logo
