Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves Good find Dylan! George Dylan Oliver wrote: Please see the thread "Foliage Penetration" (was Trango vs. Canopy or some-such). Here's what Matt Liotta said: We have found 5.8Ghz OFDM gear b

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

Good find Dylan! George Dylan Oliver wrote: Please see the thread "Foliage Penetration" (was Trango vs. Canopy or some-such). Here's what Matt Liotta said: We have found 5.8Ghz OFDM gear better than 900Mhz when it comes to NLOS links through foliage. We attribute this to a few things. First

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

y own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: "Blair Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:24 AM Subject: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

Please see the thread "Foliage Penetration" (was Trango vs. Canopy or some-such). Here's what Matt Liotta said: We have found 5.8Ghz OFDM gear better than 900Mhz when it comes to NLOS links through foliage. We attribute this to a few things. First, the noise floor at 900Mhz is higher than 5.8Ghz

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

Blair Davis wrote: Anyone have any compairsons for 5.8GHz vs leaves compaired to 2.4GHz vs leaves in Near or Non LoS conditions? Interested in data about 802.11A systems, non-propriatry... Thanks... There isn't too much non proprietary 5 gig systems out there. Star-OS atheros stuff, but

[WISPA] 5.8GHz vs Leaves

Anyone have any compairsons for 5.8GHz vs leaves compaired to 2.4GHz vs leaves in Near or Non LoS conditions? Interested in data about 802.11A systems, non-propriatry... Thanks... -- Blair Davis AOL IM Screen Name -- Theory240 West Michigan Wireless ISP 269-686-8648 A division of: Camp C