Drew Lentz wrote:
> Yeah, but that's *if* you have the spectrum available at 700/2.3/2.5/2.6,
> right? This puts a play into 3.65 which anyone can get their hands on and
> with all the CBP functions in Y and 3.65, it should make it more resilient
> to interference..
>
Huh? I was talking about 36
Yeah, but that's *if* you have the spectrum available at 700/2.3/2.5/2.6,
right? This puts a play into 3.65 which anyone can get their hands on and
with all the CBP functions in Y and 3.65, it should make it more resilient
to interference..
Just playing the opposite side here..
-d
On 12/26/08
Drew Lentz wrote:
> Will the new 802.11y standard affect the sales of proprietary WiMAX
> equipment? Since 802.11y gear operate in the 3650 - 3700 MHz band in the US,
> and it's based on WiFi, isn't it a better alternative to all that expensive
> WiMAX gear?
Depends on your definition of "better.
I have been hearing a lot of chatter over the last 2 months about 802.11y.
I¹m not sure if I missed a thread about it or not, but what are the general
thoughts? I just answered a question on LinkedIn about it. Here¹s the
question and here¹s my answer to start the convo:
Question:
Will the new 802.
