Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
Hi Patrick, I have a customer in Ca. that used Aperto (on my advice). He probably started with it in 03 or so. He was much more patient that I've ever been. The failure rates were even worse than SmartBridges. I told him many a time to bail and start using other gear. As for coming down there, I need to get back to a few shows first. I'm hoping to hit the next ISPCon (though I said that last year too). Why don't you send an engineer up here for a week or two? I'll put him to work so he can learn what we have to deal with out here in the sticks. Ben Moore spent a couple of days out here a couple of years ago. It was good for both of us. Sy, I'd think a product planning/sales type consultant could do with some time crawling under trailer homes etc.! You'd be able to offer up a lot of great advice to your engineers due to the experiences gained from several days of installs! I hope things work out for you at Aperto. They are lucky to have you working for them. Now that they are a vendor member (they are right???) I hope you'll run for a board position at WISPA! marlon - Original Message - From: "Patrick Leary" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:47 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. > Marlon, et al, > > First full disclosure: I am currently a full time consultant to Aperto, > so I obviously carry some degree of a bias. > > Marlon, I am not sure which products you are referring to, but I suspect > it is the old PacketWave products, all of which have been discontinued. > Aperto today markets only one type of product: PacketMAX. While we have > a strong 802.16e product in beta, PacketMAX is today an 802.16d product, > which is designed for and optimized for fixed environments. In the U.S., > PacketMAX supports all 5 GHz frequencies, as well as the 3.65 GHz band. > These are all bands we likely agree are fixed in nature, so 802.16d is > the correct version of WiMAX for these bands. 802.16e may have some > future (I've learned to be much less hopeful for its efficacy as an > accepted future mobile solution...actually, I am now a skeptic who > believes the market forces will render it a deep back seat to LTE), but > for fixed as it relates to WiMAX, 802.16d is the best of the WiMAX > standards. The e version injects to much overhead and latency. Using e > in a completely fixed environment is somewhat like trying to argue a > sports car makes the best cargo hauler. But, this is not the main reason > for my response... > > Aperto certainly had some big challenges in the transition from > PacketWave to PacketMAX. Many of the issues were legacy and related to > management decisions on what markets to focus on and accordingly what > bands and solution types. Marlon, since you have visited, management has > changed, including replacement of the former CEO to one who is much more > pragmatic, realistic and U.S. focused. Our new CEO, Brian Deutsch (who > is in large part why I joined), "gets" the U.S. opportunity and > especially understands what Aperto can be and more importantly, what it > can NOT be. Brian knows Aperto will not be the company to win major > carrier business, nor should it. With the team, he has made big changes > in how the company functions and responds, and with it many changes to > how products are decided upon and delivered to the market, and who > manages it. > > Recently, we made sure all product decisions and management and core > work on PacketMAX 802.16d has been moved from India back to the U.S., > where the core intelligence, executive visibility and competency exist. > This is a decision I highly support. As part of this, we have had our > most senior technical staff making long trips to key customers to live > in their environments for a bit to learn how they work and the issues > they face. We've taken these findings and converted them into actions > plans that have been already put into work and resulted in major > changes. > > PacketWave is long gone now and that product bear little resemblance to > PacketMAX, both in architecture and functionality. No more two cables up > for instance. It is now 100% IF at the base station and PoE at the CPE. > The QoS functionality is excellent. The NMS has been changed to permit > local mode support and a wide range of other "must have" features > identified by U.S. customers. The PacketMAX 802.16d product is a sound, > high value, moderately priced solution with rich features and > functionality. It is a living product (unlike what some competitiors > might claim), undergoing continuing evolution and R&D. When I was at > Alvarion, I was indoctrinated to believe th
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
So from the sound of this I should be looking at LTE as my next technology solution? Keeping in mind the LTE still is not here? Also keeping in mind that it will likely never be developed in an unlicensed spectrum solution except for maybe TV White spaces since the current networks that are deploying expect to use 700mhz as their solution. What does WiMAX even bring to the table then? The only spectrum to reliably deploy it in is 25mhz of 3650 spectrum since it is not interference tolerant. That seems like a large investment for such a small amount of spectrum especially since there are more cost effective products out today that are as good or better than WiMAX on the table, for many more bands of spectrum. I guess my real question is why WiMAX? PS I really would like to deploy WiMAX and expect to, but I am looking exclusively at .e since it is the only standard still being actively worked on that I am aware of. Anthony Will Broadband Corp. John Rock wrote: > Well said Patrick... > I would like to add - as a whole the industry uses the word "mobility" all > the time and has used that pretense of mobile broadband coverage anywhere > you go as a staple to the word WiMAX. The truth is WiMAX from about any of > the WiMAX manufacturers has made great improvements in QoS and receive > sensitivities with the use of smarter antenna technology but still fall > short in the realm of seamless mobility most of us have grown to expect with > our cell phones/hand held devices. That is 802.16d > 802.16e offers the "promise" of mobility in a seamless sense, meaning > roaming from tower to tower or sector to sector without any noticeable drop > in service. Wow I wish my cell phone never dropped a call. That may sound > great but like Patrick said the carrier groups that can maybe afford the > costs of the huge build out required to have that type of coverage have > their ties to LTE technology or are tied up with the tough economic times as > we all are. > > Now let's look at the present technology of 802.16d and Aperto as this > thread entails. I can drive from one town to another and get associated and > pass data(12Mbx8Mb). Since I drove with a CPE in my car and mobile antenna > on my roof that makes me mobile on that network right. So I may have dropped > a few packets as I roamed from site to site but as long as I can get IP back > up everything is good. Aperto has a very reliable cost effective solution > today for 3.65GHz and like any manufacture it has the functionality of WiMAX > which helps a ton with service profiling for your customers. If people are > not using some sort of 802.16(WiMAX) product they are falling behind in the > exciting future of the Wireless Marketplace. > > Now a WiMAX rant, not sure if the WiMAX Forums ears are open but, I am > disappointed that I do not have a CPE(802.16d) that can link to anyone's > Base Stations. Sure with the onset of 802.16e that is supposed to work but > the lack of earlier interoperability that the WiMAX forum promised from the > onset has been disappointing to me. If we had interoperable systems like the > essence of WiFi with the current WiMAX systems the marketplace may have been > quicker to embrace the technology and great strides could have been made for > network roaming already. Roaming agreements could already be in place if > interoperability was the true focus from the beginning. End WiMAX rant > > > John Rock > Director of Operations - Senior Engineer > Wireless Connections > 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857 > ACCessing the Future Today!! > ofc. 419.660.6100 > cell 419-706-7356 > fax 419-668-4077 > http://www.wirelessconnections.net > This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential > and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If > you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying > or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by > reply transmission and delete this electronic mail. > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Patrick Leary > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:00 PM > To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to > knowwhatyouthink. > > It's a fair question and it bugs me too. Fact is, I was a more than a > bit blind and thought I was more objective than I really was. Also, > since then the economy and other conditions has conspired to kick e in > the teeth a bit. I still belie
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
Well said Patrick... I would like to add - as a whole the industry uses the word "mobility" all the time and has used that pretense of mobile broadband coverage anywhere you go as a staple to the word WiMAX. The truth is WiMAX from about any of the WiMAX manufacturers has made great improvements in QoS and receive sensitivities with the use of smarter antenna technology but still fall short in the realm of seamless mobility most of us have grown to expect with our cell phones/hand held devices. That is 802.16d 802.16e offers the "promise" of mobility in a seamless sense, meaning roaming from tower to tower or sector to sector without any noticeable drop in service. Wow I wish my cell phone never dropped a call. That may sound great but like Patrick said the carrier groups that can maybe afford the costs of the huge build out required to have that type of coverage have their ties to LTE technology or are tied up with the tough economic times as we all are. Now let's look at the present technology of 802.16d and Aperto as this thread entails. I can drive from one town to another and get associated and pass data(12Mbx8Mb). Since I drove with a CPE in my car and mobile antenna on my roof that makes me mobile on that network right. So I may have dropped a few packets as I roamed from site to site but as long as I can get IP back up everything is good. Aperto has a very reliable cost effective solution today for 3.65GHz and like any manufacture it has the functionality of WiMAX which helps a ton with service profiling for your customers. If people are not using some sort of 802.16(WiMAX) product they are falling behind in the exciting future of the Wireless Marketplace. Now a WiMAX rant, not sure if the WiMAX Forums ears are open but, I am disappointed that I do not have a CPE(802.16d) that can link to anyone's Base Stations. Sure with the onset of 802.16e that is supposed to work but the lack of earlier interoperability that the WiMAX forum promised from the onset has been disappointing to me. If we had interoperable systems like the essence of WiFi with the current WiMAX systems the marketplace may have been quicker to embrace the technology and great strides could have been made for network roaming already. Roaming agreements could already be in place if interoperability was the true focus from the beginning. End WiMAX rant John Rock Director of Operations - Senior Engineer Wireless Connections 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857 ACCessing the Future Today!! ofc. 419.660.6100 cell 419-706-7356 fax 419-668-4077 http://www.wirelessconnections.net This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply transmission and delete this electronic mail. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:00 PM To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. It's a fair question and it bugs me too. Fact is, I was a more than a bit blind and thought I was more objective than I really was. Also, since then the economy and other conditions has conspired to kick e in the teeth a bit. I still believe it is great technology for nomadic and perhaps mobile, but it is damned near impossible to fight the LTE interests AND the current economy that is so weak no big guys are spending big CAPEX, giving LTE all the time it needs to catch technically (and it already dominates politically). That has me moving back to where I began -- wireless broadband is primarily a fixed business, with some added nomadicity in some cases. For that, d is the better standard, at least with my current hindsight. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:33 AM To: jefftho...@fastmail.fm; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, can you clarify the e vs. d for me. The reason I ask is that I saw you do the Alvarion webinar and claimed that e was the only way to go. Now that you are with Aperto, d is the only way to go. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jeff Booher wrote: > Marlon, > > What are you talking about? Our product is very reliable, and we have > many very happy customers ( including some very large ones such as > towerstream ) > >
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
It's a fair question and it bugs me too. Fact is, I was a more than a bit blind and thought I was more objective than I really was. Also, since then the economy and other conditions has conspired to kick e in the teeth a bit. I still believe it is great technology for nomadic and perhaps mobile, but it is damned near impossible to fight the LTE interests AND the current economy that is so weak no big guys are spending big CAPEX, giving LTE all the time it needs to catch technically (and it already dominates politically). That has me moving back to where I began -- wireless broadband is primarily a fixed business, with some added nomadicity in some cases. For that, d is the better standard, at least with my current hindsight. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:33 AM To: jefftho...@fastmail.fm; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, can you clarify the e vs. d for me. The reason I ask is that I saw you do the Alvarion webinar and claimed that e was the only way to go. Now that you are with Aperto, d is the only way to go. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jeff Booher wrote: > Marlon, > > What are you talking about? Our product is very reliable, and we have > many very happy customers ( including some very large ones such as > towerstream ) > > - > > Jeff > > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] > On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:00 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know > whatyouthink. > > I have heard NOTHING good about their product's reliability. I have > one consulting customer that's still using them, his failure rates are shocking. > > I'd have dumped them years ago. > > Unless this changes I'd stay far far away from Aperto. (I've been to > the Ca. offices and like the people that run the show, but that > doesn't help my customers at all.) > > marlon > > - Original Message - > From: "Pat O'Connor" > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:29 PM > Subject: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know what > youthink. > > >> We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different >> locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most >> compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the >> field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ >> >> Thanks, >> >> Pat >> >> >> - >> - >> -- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> - >> - >> -- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -- > -- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -- > -- > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -- > -- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -- > -- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
No PPPoE or Routing support either I believe. Regards Michael Baird > Not yet for 3.65 GHz, though do not use it for other bands. With few > exceptions, the CPE has performed fine, but it is not the most > attractive that is true. For this market, our intent is to enable CPEs > to be very low priced and "pretty" has taken a hit... > > > Patrick Leary > Aperto Networks > 813.426.4230 mobile > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Gino Villarini > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:38 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to > knowwhatyouthink. > > Patrick, > > Any chance of a non-tranzeo CPE in the werks? > > > Gino A. Villarini > g...@aeronetpr.com > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Patrick Leary > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:34 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to > knowwhatyou think. > > For clarity's sake, John is referring to Tranzeo below, not Aperto. > > Aperto has sync, is a WISPA member and the PM3000 micro WiMAX base > station supports over 200 CPE. The PM5000 supports over 500. > > > Patrick Leary > Aperto Networks > 813.426.4230 mobile > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of John Scrivner > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:54 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know > whatyou think. > > Cons: > No GPS sync > Max of 32 CPE per base station > CPE radio looks like somebody made it in their garage. > Not a WISPA Vendor Member (even when we have asked many times for their > support) > > Pros: > Cheap > Scriv > > > > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Eric Muehleisen > wrote: > >> Tranzeo now offers a low cost 3.65 basestation with CPE that is >> compatible with Redline's Redmax basestation and CPE. >> >> -Eric >> >> Pat O'Connor wrote: >> >>> We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different >>> locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most >>> compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the >>> field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Pat >>> >>> >>> - >>> --- >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >>> http://signup.wispa.org/ >>> - >>> --- >>> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >>> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> -- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> -- >> -- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > --
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
Not yet for 3.65 GHz, though do not use it for other bands. With few exceptions, the CPE has performed fine, but it is not the most attractive that is true. For this market, our intent is to enable CPEs to be very low priced and "pretty" has taken a hit... Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, Any chance of a non-tranzeo CPE in the werks? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:34 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyou think. For clarity's sake, John is referring to Tranzeo below, not Aperto. Aperto has sync, is a WISPA member and the PM3000 micro WiMAX base station supports over 200 CPE. The PM5000 supports over 500. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:54 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know whatyou think. Cons: No GPS sync Max of 32 CPE per base station CPE radio looks like somebody made it in their garage. Not a WISPA Vendor Member (even when we have asked many times for their support) Pros: Cheap Scriv On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote: > Tranzeo now offers a low cost 3.65 basestation with CPE that is > compatible with Redline's Redmax basestation and CPE. > > -Eric > > Pat O'Connor wrote: >> We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different >> locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most >> compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the >> field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ >> >> Thanks, >> >> Pat >> >> >> - >> --- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> - >> --- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> > > > > -- > -- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -- > -- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink.
Not yet for 3.65 GHz, though do not use it for other bands. With few exceptions, the CPE has performed fine, but it is not the most attractive that is true. For this market, our intent is to enable CPEs to be very low priced and "pretty" has taken a hit... Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyouthink. Patrick, Any chance of a non-tranzeo CPE in the werks? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:34 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to knowwhatyou think. For clarity's sake, John is referring to Tranzeo below, not Aperto. Aperto has sync, is a WISPA member and the PM3000 micro WiMAX base station supports over 200 CPE. The PM5000 supports over 500. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:54 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anybody use Aperto for 3.65GHz? I'd like to know whatyou think. Cons: No GPS sync Max of 32 CPE per base station CPE radio looks like somebody made it in their garage. Not a WISPA Vendor Member (even when we have asked many times for their support) Pros: Cheap Scriv On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote: > Tranzeo now offers a low cost 3.65 basestation with CPE that is > compatible with Redline's Redmax basestation and CPE. > > -Eric > > Pat O'Connor wrote: >> We're looking to deploy 3.65GHz this year in a couple of different >> locations because of interference issues. So far they have the most >> compelling price point. I'd like to know how well it works in the >> field. All opinions appreciated. Hit me off list if you want to.\ >> >> Thanks, >> >> Pat >> >> >> - >> --- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> - >> --- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> > > > > -- > -- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -- > -- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
