Re: [WISPA] Dumb question?
Gino Villarini wrote:p > Easy, the current Wimax MAC (802.16d and e) was designed for licensed > frequencies, noise is not well handled by the protocol I'll have to admit believing some of the WiMAX hype until I heard this fact several months ago. The only people I see taking WiMAX seriously are service providers and carriers, particularly those who want to preserve their spectrum. They don't have to worry about competing noise because of their sole license. In many of these cases, they are buying the equipment for little more than to preserve the right to do what they want on that frequency. Is this what others are seeing also? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Dumb question?
Easy, the current Wimax MAC (802.16d and e) was designed for licensed frequencies, noise is not well handled by the protocol Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of D. Ryan Spott Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:11 PM To: undisclosed-recipients Subject: [WISPA] Dumb question? We have this ?great? MAC used for WIMAX in various frequencies. Why can't we (or some vendor) use this MAC in 2.4/900? It just makes sense I would think. There must be a reason... please clue me in with the clue-by-four. ryan WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Dumb question?
We have this ?great? MAC used for WIMAX in various frequencies. Why can't we (or some vendor) use this MAC in 2.4/900? It just makes sense I would think. There must be a reason... please clue me in with the clue-by-four. ryan WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
