Curious... we build wireless because we can't get fiber 'out there.' In
fact, we're using wireless backhaul to feed FTTH.
If you're needing wireless for last-mile, how are you getting fiber to the
tower itself? Why not just fiber to the home?
-Troy
-Original Message-
From:
Fiber to one spot is cheaper than fiber to hundreds. Fiber to the rest
comes gradually.
Plus, most of the time, the fiber is already there or near.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 2/14/2012 10:07 AM, Troy Settle wrote:
Curious... we build wireless
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:22 PM, John Scrivner wrote:
Here are my predictions based partly upon the acquisitions we have
seen of Atheros by Qualcomm and now this latest play into Wifi by
otherwise generally licensed zealots of the mobile world:
[snip]
I predict we'll see all this come to pass
Fiber to the AP is a great idea and the only way we will be able to meet
customer demand. Within 1 year I don't think I'll have any towers that
are more than 1 hop from fiber, with many directly on fiber.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 1/26/2012
Fellas, build a business plan around and obvious need of the operators
And remember that by wifi , they mean n and future versions which use 2.4 and
5.x ghz
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Jan 27, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Fiber to the AP
Fiber to the AP? Why not just do an 802.11ac gigabit backhaul link to
the AP with the new Ubiquiti revolutionary radio? :)
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Fiber to the AP is a great idea and the only way we will be able to meet
customer demand.
I am just making a prediction. I believe those with infrastructure in
the air and the ground will be deploying these micro-cell platforms
like crazy. Will you? Do you now?
Scriv
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Roger Howard g5inter...@gmail.com wrote:
Fiber to the AP? Why not just do an
I'd rather use spectrum to service customers, not towers.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 1/27/2012 9:23 AM, Roger Howard wrote:
Fiber to the AP? Why not just do an 802.11ac gigabit backhaul link to
the AP with the new Ubiquiti revolutionary radio?
You can still use spectrum for customers as long as your back-haul links
use antennas with small beam widths, or run your back-haul links in
horizontal and customer links in vertical polarity. The fact that our
infrastructure is 100% wireless (outside our Internet upstream links)
has been a
There is no more advantage to V vs. H with dual polarity equipment.
More spectrum for customer access means more bits able to be moved. If I
have a gig of wireless backhaul coming into a tower, that's a gig I
could be using to make me money. I'd like to have 50 - 100 megabit plans
for my
With 10 to 18,000 nodes in a cable citywide deployment you will not have
enough spectrum to do that. These new deployments are hard wiring every node
to their infrastructure either DOCSIS or fiber. The feature of that is just
that your footprint to the end user gets smaller with more interference,
Here are my predictions based partly upon the acquisitions we have
seen of Atheros by Qualcomm and now this latest play into Wifi by
otherwise generally licensed zealots of the mobile world:
The large mobile carrier equipment companies will supply Wifi
solutions to the national players who will
John,
I think this will happen faster than you predict. With the Lucent
light radio being software defined the technology already exists to do this.
Carrier engineering departments are just a bit slow to change. Carriers have
to look at the Pico cell design to increase capacity by more
13 matches
Mail list logo
