We have hot spot roaming agreements with some of our local
competitors. It's not the full monty you're describing, but it does
mean that a subscriber on competitor A can log onto my network without
paying any additional fees and vice versa.
Right now we don't do any settlement because it's n
>
> The problems are numerous. Building a scalable solution that will fit
> multiple operators is a real challenge. Some of the challenges will
> potentially require you and your proposed partner to make significant
> network design changes. If you have an interest in such a project,
> let's get
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:12 -0600, John Scrivner wrote:
> Sadly WISPs have dragged their feet in development of true mobility
> and roaming.
There are many reasons for this, some of which make roaming a near
impossibility. I have some customers who are doing some things that are
very near to one
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
> This is an interesting idea
>
> But, different operating frequency's, different proprietary equipment, I'm
> not sure it is practical. One of my 'neighbors' uses Canopy on 900MHz.
> Another is using Trango on 900MHz, I think. Another is
This is an interesting idea
But, different operating frequency's, different proprietary
equipment, I'm not sure it is practical. One of my 'neighbors' uses
Canopy on 900MHz. Another is using Trango on 900MHz, I think. Another
is 2.4GHz 802.11b/g. I use 2.4GHz, some b/g, some propriet
Sadly WISPs have dragged their feet in development of true mobility
and roaming. These features are the true differentiators of wireless
broadband over DSL or DOCSIS. The cellular industry is more quickly
adapting to the need to move to an IP centric platform for their
mobile voice/data systems tha
