- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
> There is no channel one. ;-)
>
> To do a little more homewo
ISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
>>
>> To keep things simple, I'll speak to analog channels. Channels 2, 5, 7,
>> 9,
>> 11, 26, 32, 44, and 50 are the major Chicago stations. If I try to use
>> channel 9 around here
as never intended to be that way from day one.
That could be. And personally I don't think that's a bad thing. The 5.3
and 5.4 bands should work nicely for high density short range sites.
marlon
>
>
> Thank You,
> Brian Webster
>
> -Original Message-
>
>
> To keep things simple, I'll speak to analog channels. Channels 2, 5, 7,
> 9,
> 11, 26, 32, 44, and 50 are the major Chicago stations. If I try to use
> channel 9 around here with sensing, I deserve to get kicked out. Sensing
> should allow me to be closer to Davenport, IA's channel 6 based
- Original Message -
From: "Forrest W. Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
> I'm going to ignore the first part of your email (since I&
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
>I can tell you myself that I have personally spent hundreds of hours
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
I can tell you myself that I have personally spent hundreds of hours toward
this effort, as has Marlon. As with any group effort there is no way to
please everyone. After exhaustive discussions between everyone over 3 plus
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
>Isn't that what the elected are supposed to do? Make decisions as
>to what they feel their constituency wants without directly asking
>them every time? If you don't like whomever was voted in, you vote
>someone in that will speak more in line with what
Mike Hammett wrote:
> The difference between sensing in 5 GHz and sensing in TV spaces is that the
> TV transmitters are published and easily accessed in terms of location,
> height, transmitter power, etc.
But microphone users are not. The sensing proposals indicate that
sensing devices *mus
l not get a lot from
whitespaces. It really was never intended to be that way from day one.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISP
x27;s practically useless.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Forrest W. Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 10:58 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: R
ttp://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 10:42 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
> I can tell you myself that I have personally spe
lon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:29 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
> Hi All,
>
> As a member of the FCC committee and a long term DC participant (first
&
I'm going to ignore the first part of your email (since I'm sure others
will discuss), and point out a couple of things you missed:
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> I have MAJOR problems with the stance on adjacent channels. We give up 3
> for 1 every time a TV channel, or microphone etc. fires up in
---
> From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:29 AM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>
ttp://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:29 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
> Hi All,
>
> As a member of the FCC co
]
-Original Message-
From: Marlon K. Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 02:29 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Raining on the whitespaces parade
Hi All, As a member of the FCC committee and a long term DC participant (f
Hi All,
As a member of the FCC committee and a long term DC participant (first went
there as a WISP in 2001 or 2002) I feel I have to point out some critical
flaws in our proposals. I said much of this at the committee level but to
no avail.
First, let me say this though. The filing is maste
18 matches
Mail list logo
