At 6/20/2010 12:28 PM, you wrote:
>Thar she blows! Your'e right.
>
>But why would they run doppler weather radar on a drill ship?
Who knows? Even stranger, why run it when docked for repairs far
from a drill site? But it's possible that it's there for safety, to
see if there's bad weather appr
Thar she blows! Your'e right.
But why would they run doppler weather radar on a drill ship?
Greg
On Jun 20, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 6/20/2010 07:36 AM, Greg Ithen wrote:
>> A quick googling of "900mhz maritime radar" turned up nothing. A
>> googling of "900mhz radar" turn
At 6/20/2010 07:36 AM, Greg Ithen wrote:
>A quick googling of "900mhz maritime radar" turned up nothing. A
>googling of "900mhz radar" turned up a few devices for "ground
>penetrating radar" (finding public utilities pipes and cables under pavement).
You need to look for "915 MHz", which is the
A quick googling of "900mhz maritime radar" turned up nothing. A googling of
"900mhz radar" turned up a few devices for "ground penetrating radar" (finding
public utilities pipes and cables under pavement).
Wouldn't these drilling rigs be using sub-centimeter GPS for on station
positioning rath
At 6/19/2010 08:14 AM, you wrote:
>We've got a 700' drilling ship moored about a mile off our coast for a
>few days for repairs.
>
>http://www.stena-drilling.com/sub.asp?m=drilling&p=stenaforth
>
>Since it came in, 900mhz within a couple miles of it has stopped
>working. We went out with the spectr
ld they call the harbor master and ask him to
> contact the Capt or 1st officer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 4:36 PM
> To: WISPA General List
ispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 4:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] interference from ships
That's funny. That article claims that "Below 900 MHz the target radar
cross section increases exponentially, however the
w-frequency_radar are our friends...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:01 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] interference
WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] interference from ships
Possible but don't quit believe so since 900MHz GSM uses 890-914Mhz for
uplink (cell to base station), and 921-960Mhz for download (basestation to
cell). That strong signal wouldn't come from cells and the basestation wou
rday, June 19, 2010 12:01 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] interference from ships
>
> Possible but don't quit believe so since 900MHz GSM uses 890-914Mhz for
> uplink (cell to base station), and 921-960Mhz for download (basestation to
> cell). Th
CAN THAT BE SOME FORM OF RADAR?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] interference from ships
Possible but don'
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 1:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] interference from ships
"Plug the damn hole!" - lol! Sorry, I couldnt help it :)
Since it's a UK ship, I wonder if this has anything to do with it?
http:/
"Plug the damn hole!" - lol! Sorry, I couldnt help it :)
Since it's a UK ship, I wonder if this has anything to do with it?
http://www.eubusiness.com/topics/telecoms/mobile-ships.01/
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 8:14 AM, jp wrote:
> We've got a 700' drilling ship moored about a mile off our coast for
We've got a 700' drilling ship moored about a mile off our coast for a
few days for repairs.
http://www.stena-drilling.com/sub.asp?m=drilling&p=stenaforth
Since it came in, 900mhz within a couple miles of it has stopped
working. We went out with the spectrum analyser after the Alvarion
softwar
14 matches
Mail list logo
