To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or
techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed.
I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650
experimental licenses for commercial service. As I
Steve Stroh wrote:
I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650
experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it,
commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5 experimental
license rules. What those rules DO state is that the Part 5 license
doesn't give
Message -
From: Steve Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or
techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed.
I
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
As I remember the rules for the experimental license applications, it
specifically says that they can't be used for commercial purposes.
But it really doesn't matter, the FCC knew what
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
That's pretty much what I thought it would be for, hence the 2 mile radius
indoor CPE just isn't going to fly.
-
Mike
Mike
Standard 3.65Ghz OFDM does not work as well as 2.4Ghz OFDM but it's better
than 5Ghz OFDM. Right now we see 3.65Ghz as a great replacement for areas
that have issues with LOS 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz business level users as well as
PtP back haul links. This is simply because in most areas there is
: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:19 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Mike
Standard 3.65Ghz OFDM does not work as well as 2.4Ghz OFDM but it's better
than 5Ghz OFDM. Right now we see 3.65Ghz as a great replacement for areas
that have issues with LOS 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz business level users
An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or
techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed.
I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650
experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it,
commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5
Mike Hammett wrote:
Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How does it
really work compared to 2.4? Next year I'm putting up 2 more towers and had
planned on 2.4 GHz 90* sectors.
As far as I am aware, no one has received a license in 3650 to provide
service to
-
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Mike Hammett wrote:
Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How
does it really work compared to 2.4
Mike Hammett wrote:
People have used basically the same gear in 3650 for a couple years now
thanks to experimental licenses. I know of two that have, but I have
not heard their input yet on my latest inquiry.
Those of that have using experimental licenses only got to test things
such as
Reading Covad's narrative rationale for their license, it sounded to me like
they were offering limited commercial service on a limited,
clearly-labeled-as-experimental basis:
The use of limited market studies will permit
equipment testing (like other markets) as well as deployment of limited
12 matches
Mail list logo
