RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Well this is yet to be seen, the noise floor at 3.65Ghz should be very clean. This means you will be able to make links as much lower signal levels then with 2.4Ghz. And OFDM will help with NearLOS issues with buildings, but if are dealing with trees OFDM is not going to help much this will come down to simply physic. Sincerely, Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 http://www.demarctech.com This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of the confidential or privileged nature of the communication. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender by return electronic mail and delete all copies of this communication -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:24 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP That's pretty much what I thought it would be for, hence the 2 mile radius indoor CPE just isn't going to fly. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:19 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP > Mike > > Standard 3.65Ghz OFDM does not work as well as 2.4Ghz OFDM but it's better > than 5Ghz OFDM. Right now we see 3.65Ghz as a great replacement for areas > that have issues with LOS 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz business level users as well as > PtP back haul links. This is simply because in most areas there is little > to > no source of interference where the signal to noise levels are going to be > 25dBm+! And of course you have very little to worry about when it comes to > new sites coming on line, for one you will know who and where they are > plus > the rules states very clearly licenses holders must work together. > > Sincerely, Tony Morella > Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider > Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 > http://www.demarctech.com > > This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the > meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510, and its > disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of > this message. This communication may contain confidential and privileged > material for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone > other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of the > confidential or privileged nature of the communication. Any review or > distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient please contact the sender by return electronic mail and delete > all > copies of this communication > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:16 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP > > Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How > does > it really work compared to 2.4? Next year I'm putting up 2 more towers > and > had planned on 2.4 GHz 90* sectors. > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > WISPA
RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
It does matter though. If the rules state that you can not do something, don't do it, it is really simple. I never read the rules, and never applied for one. The thing people need to understand is the FCC is probably the last person, next to the IRS, that you want watching you. The FCC knows what was going on, and they took notes I am sure, someday it could come to bite all of us in the but.. Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:47 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP As I remember the rules for the experimental license applications, it specifically says that they can't be used for commercial purposes. But it really doesn't matter, the FCC knew what was being done with the bands and wanted to see what would happen anyway. laters, marlon - Original Message - From: "Steve Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:53 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP > An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or > techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed. > > I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650 > experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it, > commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5 experimental > license rules. What those rules DO state is that the Part 5 license > doesn't give you any special preference whatsoever when the FCC deems > that the period of your experimental license is up... like it would be > now that the 3650 rules are set and commercial service is commencing. > > Those experimental deployments that I heard about were PMP for > backhaul and for access for business customers; I haven't heard of any > 3650 residential deployments, though that would be feasible using 3.5 > Fixed WiMAX CPE that has been updated for 3650 rules. > > It was kept pretty quiet, except with the vendors that were supplying > "experimentally compliant" 3650 gear, but there were MANY larger > Broadband Wireless Internet Access Service Providers who used > experimental licenses similar to Covad's rationale quoted in Dylan > Oliver's message. While all those deployments had to be similarly > couched in "yes, we acknowledge it's experimental..." language, they > all used such systems for commercial, revenue service... THAT was the > "experiment" - to see if it was feasible, economical, and reliable. It > worked; looks like 3650 will be quite the success, especially with the > mandated coordination / non-interference between competing service > providers in urban areas. > > Thanks, > > Steve > > On Nov 19, 2007 12:39 PM, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Those of that have using experimental licenses only got to test things >> such as propagation. We where not allowed to provide commercial >> services. Anyone who might have used their license incorrectly is >> certainly not going to admit to it on a public list. Therefore, your >> question cannot be answered. >> >> >> -Matt >> > > -- > Steve Stroh > Editor / Analyst, Stroh Publications LLC > 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
As I remember the rules for the experimental license applications, it specifically says that they can't be used for commercial purposes. But it really doesn't matter, the FCC knew what was being done with the bands and wanted to see what would happen anyway. laters, marlon - Original Message - From: "Steve Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:53 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed. I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650 experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it, commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5 experimental license rules. What those rules DO state is that the Part 5 license doesn't give you any special preference whatsoever when the FCC deems that the period of your experimental license is up... like it would be now that the 3650 rules are set and commercial service is commencing. Those experimental deployments that I heard about were PMP for backhaul and for access for business customers; I haven't heard of any 3650 residential deployments, though that would be feasible using 3.5 Fixed WiMAX CPE that has been updated for 3650 rules. It was kept pretty quiet, except with the vendors that were supplying "experimentally compliant" 3650 gear, but there were MANY larger Broadband Wireless Internet Access Service Providers who used experimental licenses similar to Covad's rationale quoted in Dylan Oliver's message. While all those deployments had to be similarly couched in "yes, we acknowledge it's experimental..." language, they all used such systems for commercial, revenue service... THAT was the "experiment" - to see if it was feasible, economical, and reliable. It worked; looks like 3650 will be quite the success, especially with the mandated coordination / non-interference between competing service providers in urban areas. Thanks, Steve On Nov 19, 2007 12:39 PM, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Those of that have using experimental licenses only got to test things such as propagation. We where not allowed to provide commercial services. Anyone who might have used their license incorrectly is certainly not going to admit to it on a public list. Therefore, your question cannot be answered. -Matt -- Steve Stroh Editor / Analyst, Stroh Publications LLC 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Steve Stroh wrote: I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650 experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it, commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5 experimental license rules. What those rules DO state is that the Part 5 license doesn't give you any special preference whatsoever when the FCC deems that the period of your experimental license is up... like it would be now that the 3650 rules are set and commercial service is commencing. I am aware that some operators attempted to apply section 5.3j as a way to providing commercial services using their experimental license. I have included the relevant language below. Theoretically, if the operator owns the equipment and informs the customer that their service is an experiment and is strictly temporary then the operator could use 3650. Without arguing whether any reasonable customer would accept those conditions. How do you collect revenue on such a customer? When we sell internet and/or phone service to a customer they sign a contract that lays out what service(s) we are providing them, the term, and ultimately how much the customer owes us. Contract terms are a two way street. In this case, that means if you have to shutdown the experiment before the end of the contract term you as an operator are in default of your contract. This means of course that you cannot have a term associated with the service. This leads to a very specialized contract or worse no contract. Again, what customer signs up for a situation like this? Sec. 5.93 Limited market studies. Unless otherwise stated in the instrument of authorization, licenses granted for the purpose of limited market studies pursuant to Sec. 5.3(j) of this part are subject to the following conditions: (a) All transmitting and/or receiving equipment used in the study shall be owned by the licensee. (b) The licensee is responsible for informing anyone participating in the experiment that the service or device is granted under an experimental authorization and is strictly temporary. (c) The size and scope of the experiment are subject to limitations as the Commission shall establish on a case-by-case basis. If the Commission subsequently determines that a market study is not so limited, the study shall be immediately terminated -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Steve, Thanks for the clarification and comments. There is always a lot of conjecture on some of these subjects that the "normal man" who has never held an experimental license holds as truths, but in reality is not totally true at all. I (as I am sure others) appreciate the time you take to "get the facts straight" on some of the subjects that come up on list. Continue educating us and keep us in line! :) Thanks Mac Dearman > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Steve Stroh > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:53 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP > > An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or > techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed. > > I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650 > experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it, > commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5 experimental > license rules. What those rules DO state is that the Part 5 license > doesn't give you any special preference whatsoever when the FCC deems > that the period of your experimental license is up... like it would be > now that the 3650 rules are set and commercial service is commencing. > > Those experimental deployments that I heard about were PMP for > backhaul and for access for business customers; I haven't heard of any > 3650 residential deployments, though that would be feasible using 3.5 > Fixed WiMAX CPE that has been updated for 3650 rules. > > It was kept pretty quiet, except with the vendors that were supplying > "experimentally compliant" 3650 gear, but there were MANY larger > Broadband Wireless Internet Access Service Providers who used > experimental licenses similar to Covad's rationale quoted in Dylan > Oliver's message. While all those deployments had to be similarly > couched in "yes, we acknowledge it's experimental..." language, they > all used such systems for commercial, revenue service... THAT was the > "experiment" - to see if it was feasible, economical, and reliable. It > worked; looks like 3650 will be quite the success, especially with the > mandated coordination / non-interference between competing service > providers in urban areas. > > Thanks, > > Steve > > On Nov 19, 2007 12:39 PM, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Those of that have using experimental licenses only got to test > things > > such as propagation. We where not allowed to provide commercial > > services. Anyone who might have used their license incorrectly is > > certainly not going to admit to it on a public list. Therefore, your > > question cannot be answered. > > > > > > -Matt > > > > -- > Steve Stroh > Editor / Analyst, Stroh Publications LLC > 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com > > > --- > - > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > --- > - > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
An experimental license allows you to test systems, spectrum, or techniques that otherwise aren't normally allowed. I know of a number of service providers that used their 3650 experimental licenses for commercial service. As I understand it, commercial operations aren't DISALLOWED by the Part 5 experimental license rules. What those rules DO state is that the Part 5 license doesn't give you any special preference whatsoever when the FCC deems that the period of your experimental license is up... like it would be now that the 3650 rules are set and commercial service is commencing. Those experimental deployments that I heard about were PMP for backhaul and for access for business customers; I haven't heard of any 3650 residential deployments, though that would be feasible using 3.5 Fixed WiMAX CPE that has been updated for 3650 rules. It was kept pretty quiet, except with the vendors that were supplying "experimentally compliant" 3650 gear, but there were MANY larger Broadband Wireless Internet Access Service Providers who used experimental licenses similar to Covad's rationale quoted in Dylan Oliver's message. While all those deployments had to be similarly couched in "yes, we acknowledge it's experimental..." language, they all used such systems for commercial, revenue service... THAT was the "experiment" - to see if it was feasible, economical, and reliable. It worked; looks like 3650 will be quite the success, especially with the mandated coordination / non-interference between competing service providers in urban areas. Thanks, Steve On Nov 19, 2007 12:39 PM, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those of that have using experimental licenses only got to test things > such as propagation. We where not allowed to provide commercial > services. Anyone who might have used their license incorrectly is > certainly not going to admit to it on a public list. Therefore, your > question cannot be answered. > > > -Matt > -- Steve Stroh Editor / Analyst, Stroh Publications LLC 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
That's pretty much what I thought it would be for, hence the 2 mile radius indoor CPE just isn't going to fly. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:19 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP Mike Standard 3.65Ghz OFDM does not work as well as 2.4Ghz OFDM but it's better than 5Ghz OFDM. Right now we see 3.65Ghz as a great replacement for areas that have issues with LOS 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz business level users as well as PtP back haul links. This is simply because in most areas there is little to no source of interference where the signal to noise levels are going to be 25dBm+! And of course you have very little to worry about when it comes to new sites coming on line, for one you will know who and where they are plus the rules states very clearly licenses holders must work together. Sincerely, Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 http://www.demarctech.com This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of the confidential or privileged nature of the communication. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender by return electronic mail and delete all copies of this communication -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:16 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How does it really work compared to 2.4? Next year I'm putting up 2 more towers and had planned on 2.4 GHz 90* sectors. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Mike Standard 3.65Ghz OFDM does not work as well as 2.4Ghz OFDM but it's better than 5Ghz OFDM. Right now we see 3.65Ghz as a great replacement for areas that have issues with LOS 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz business level users as well as PtP back haul links. This is simply because in most areas there is little to no source of interference where the signal to noise levels are going to be 25dBm+! And of course you have very little to worry about when it comes to new sites coming on line, for one you will know who and where they are plus the rules states very clearly licenses holders must work together. Sincerely, Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008 http://www.demarctech.com This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a loss of the confidential or privileged nature of the communication. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender by return electronic mail and delete all copies of this communication -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:16 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How does it really work compared to 2.4? Next year I'm putting up 2 more towers and had planned on 2.4 GHz 90* sectors. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Reading Covad's narrative rationale for their license, it sounded to me like they were offering limited commercial service on a limited, clearly-labeled-as-experimental basis: "The use of limited market studies will permit equipment testing (like other markets) as well as deployment of limited subscriber equipment to understand market requirements as well as technological issues associated with this spectrum. Covad hereby agrees to comply with the provisions of Section 5.93 in conducting its limited market study. In particular, Covad will: (a) own all of the transmitting and/or receiving equipment; and (b) be responsible for informing anyone participating in the experiment that the service is granted under an experimental authorization and is strictly temporary." Here's Section 5.93: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=c8dac1967310be65aa88f8d1956f1241&rgn=div8&view=text&node=47:1.0.1.1.6.2.237.22&idno=47 (sorry for the long link; TinyURL isn't working) Their "limited deployment" consisted of 16 Aperto Packetwave base stations and 200 subscriber units with authorization to operate at 20+ locations across many markets: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/442_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=30877&license_seq=31192 Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Mike Hammett wrote: People have used basically the same gear in 3650 for a couple years now thanks to experimental licenses. I know of two that have, but I have not heard their input yet on my latest inquiry. Those of that have using experimental licenses only got to test things such as propagation. We where not allowed to provide commercial services. Anyone who might have used their license incorrectly is certainly not going to admit to it on a public list. Therefore, your question cannot be answered. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
People have used basically the same gear in 3650 for a couple years now thanks to experimental licenses. I know of two that have, but I have not heard their input yet on my latest inquiry. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP Mike Hammett wrote: Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How does it really work compared to 2.4? Next year I'm putting up 2 more towers and had planned on 2.4 GHz 90* sectors. As far as I am aware, no one has received a license in 3650 to provide service to customers. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 3650 PtMP vs. 2.4 PtMP
Mike Hammett wrote: Who has used 3650 in a true PtMP residential customer application? How does it really work compared to 2.4? Next year I'm putting up 2 more towers and had planned on 2.4 GHz 90* sectors. As far as I am aware, no one has received a license in 3650 to provide service to customers. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
