Don, I did test the 1400 integrated units as a PtP bridge last summer
for 60 days. Worked flawlessly. Never set it up as an AP though. I liked
that it used two runs of 75ohm cable up the tower to the units with
three grounding blocks along the 150 ft path. I didn't keep them because
the Trango
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hulsebus
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:44 PM
To: wireless @wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco Wireless Bridges
Don, I did test the 1400 integrated units as a PtP bridge last summer
for 60 days. Worked flawlessly. Never set it up as an AP though. I liked
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco Wireless Bridges
They work OK for us in the East San Francisco Bay area.
They have the ability to move to a different channel if the noise gets
too bad.
JT
Don Annas wrote:
Is anyone using the Cisco 1300 or 1400 series AP/Bridges?
I know they are a bit pricing
They work OK for us in the East San Francisco Bay area.
They have the ability to move to a different channel if the noise gets
too bad.
JT
Don Annas wrote:
Is anyone using the Cisco 1300 or 1400 series AP/Bridges?
I know they are a bit pricing, but was curious how they performed in a
Cough, cough cough...
At 01:48 PM 10/4/2007, you wrote:
Is anyone using the Cisco 1300 or 1400 series AP/Bridges?
I know they are a bit pricing, but was curious how they performed in a noisy
environment?
Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH