I hope it isn't just that easy for them.
A good think for consumers in served areas, very likely.
A good thing for competitions and Anti-Trust, definately not.
A good thing for WISPs and rural America, not a chance.
One arguement could be made that if Verizon could obtain more revenue from
subs
The VZ Petition that was forborn was 04-440, the broadband petition that
followed BellSouth's 04-405.
VZ piled on for relief on the packet-switching services like ATM, Frame
Relay, and IP VPN.
My bet would be that any Special Access circuits will be subject to
random pricing going forward.
Bas
The FCC's Martin is giving away the store and is allowing a complete
meltdown of the TA 96 Act. By far, this does not enhance competition as
mandated by Sec 10 of the TA 96 Act. I'll agree completely with this
statement below:
"The chairman's action yesterday represents the height of irrespons
Chris,
As quoted from Michael Copps Statement;
"Universal Service: By failing to act, the contribution base for
universal service could be put in jeopardy. Rural America relies on the
universal service fund to ensure they have telecommunications on a par
with the rest of the country. Without i
So how does this affect rural America?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 7:35 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] FCC/Verizon forbearence ruling
All,
Verizon successfully wins the forbearence rul
