Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Chris Chamberlain
We recently had a similar complaint and our Health and Safety Department came up with a good write up I thought, tying in the fact that our APs are FCC compliant and sourcing other sites such as OSHA, WHO and FDA. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): OSHA maintains information

RE: time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread McClintic, Thomas
It would be very helpful to have a visible comparison for proposed acceptable levels of exposure compared to maximum FCC regulations, and then compared to average transmit power for your environment. Something similar to showing a high wattage bulb then lowering the power to the ratio of FCC ma

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Kitri Waterman
You could link them vendor datasheets showing that typical microwave units are 1,000+ watts over a small area while your average indoor AP at max power is 200 milliwatts (23 dBM) over many square feet. Or just procure them one of these: http://euclidgarment.com/KVGARD/KVGard.html Kitri -- Univers

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Mark Duling
On climate change, I think the argument is over whether the change is cyclical or not, and who has the burden of proof when advocating shared political and economic changes because of it. I don't think the argument is over whether change has or is happening or not. When it comes to scientific stud

RE: time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Turner, Ryan H
I think that papers from wireless vendors are pretty much going to be untrustworthy (like the studies from the cigarette companies years ago that said cigarettes are not addictive). I think seriously researched medical journal papers are going to be on the most solid ground. Trying to hunt tho

RE: time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Lee H Badman
Every WLAN vendor has their own white paper on this, but they all say the same thing. I also sat through a course not so long ago that laid waste to the notion of dangerous Wi-Fi. https://www.acgih.org/resources/press/emr-webinar_pr.htm is excellent, and puts the topic to bed. -Lee Badman Fr

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Christina Klam
When people have concerns, we point them to the following: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/index.html http://web.princeton.edu/sites/ehs/radiation/nirad.htm#WiFi Regards, Christina On 04/09/2014 01:47 PM, Gogan, James P wrote: > Well, it's that time of year again, wherein we g

time for the annual "wifi will kill us" response

2014-04-09 Thread Gogan, James P
Well, it's that time of year again, wherein we get the following contact from one faculty member or staff member (out of tens of thousands of students, faculty and staff): " I am an adjunct faculty member and I would like to have a meeting with someone that is charge of the WiFi system on the

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 7.4.121.0 client association age out

2014-04-09 Thread Mike King
Do you have a packet capture? I know that (your Step 5) when a client sends a DISCOVER, it can request it's old address. You're using DHCP proxy, so it's definitely looking at the packets. Could that be it? Mike On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Koprowski, Gregory John wrote: > Hello, > > >