We run 40mhz in 5ghz for all our ap's (around 4,000). We monitor channel
utilization and interference but so far it
looks fine. Our argument was 40 or 80 and we decided to play it safe and do
just 40.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I was just reading a blog article that heavily recommends *not* to use
We’re running a 20MHz channel plan due to our AP density (one per classroom),
over summer I’m going to look at enabling 40MHz in the less-dense non-teaching
areas. Whenever I try out DFS channels they always get radared out within a day.
While troubleshooting a performance issue recently I was
A gentle caution about the Aircheck. I love the product, but our gen 1 devices
just took a major utility hit when we changed to a SHA-256 4K cert that the
device couldn’t support. Now we can’t use it for connectivity tests on our 1x
SSID. There’s a 2K key size limit on the gen 1 Airchecks.
20 in our dense spaces, 40 where it can be done safely- about 50/50.
Lee Badman (mobile)
On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Jason Cook
> wrote:
It all comes down to requirements & design, if you can have 0 channel overlap
while using
http://netool.io/ competes with LinkSprinter- is a nice tool on sale right now,
FYI. Also NetScout running buy one/get one sale on AirCheck G2- but that sale
is almost over as well.
Just FYI, both are worth having.
Lee Badman (mobile)
**
Participation and subscription information for
For those who are using only 20 MHz in the 5 GHz space, I’d be interested to
know what your channel planning looks like.
Thank you,
Josh Heller
Kutztown University
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of GT Hill
It all comes down to requirements & design, if you can have 0 channel overlap
while using 40Mhz then go for it… This is likely to be quite a challenge in
multi-floor environments. Using tools like Ekahau Site Survey and Airmagnet
survey will help design and verify these installs.
We went from
I have seen real data where changing from 20/40 to 20 MHz only improved network
congestion by 30+%. I would say based on data that I see, a default config of
20 MHz channelization is a good best practice with 40 MHz done strategically if
necessary. Just my $.02.
GT
From: The EDUCAUSE
I have been working under this thought process also, that it is better to keep
it at 20 MHz. I have made no effort to test at 40 or 80 MHz nor do I have any
plans at this time.
Don Sullivan
Network Administrator
205-726-2111
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Where we’ve carefully located APs, matched Tx power and available rates to
the AP layout, and use DFS channels we’ve had no trouble using 40Mhz
channels. Were we have a legacy layout without optimized RF settings we’ve
achieved better results with 20Mhz layouts. You’re probably only forced
Hello,
Has anybody done a Strategic Wireless RFI.
Please don’t ask me what it is, if you have done one, please share what you can
either in public or in private.
Have you seen anything from Educause in this regard?
Thanks
Michel Davidoff
Director CyberInfrastructure
California State
Mac equivalents:
1.) option-click on the Airport icon in the menu bar to see instantaneous
detailed information on the current connection.
2.) Another command-line Mac tool is available at:
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Apple80211.framework/Versions/A/Resources/airport
This will give you
The first thing I do when I notice WiFi issues on my Windows laptop is to bring
up the WiFi Status window on my wireless adapter. This tells me the signal
quality, the speed, and the SSID I'm connected to. If I select details (Network
Connection Details) I then get more info like IP address and
13 matches
Mail list logo