I don't blame them for not wanting multiple users on a single license.
However, I do blame them for not warning us that we were apparently
breaking the ToS and decided to kill our license without notice. This left
me, on a weekend and in a pinch, unable to even open my surveys.
How were we
Never heard of 'em, Lee!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:24 AM Lee H Badman <
00db5b77bd95-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
> Curious if anyone can speak about the Wi-Fi and network requirements for
> Washlava laundry machines? I’m assuming they are WI-Fi only, but can find
> little of
To be fair, I read "AFO" and thought, "What in the world is that?"
I was obviously undeterred.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:05 PM Julian Y Koh
wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2021, at 16:03, Philippe Hanset <
> 005cd62f91b7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.educause.edu> wrote:
>
> Ok, Full Disclosure … I was in
I don't believe Wi-Fi is a good technology for this. It's nice when you can
reuse existing overhead, but I don't think 2.4/5/6 radio is the answer.
You're just begging for false positives.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:47 PM Seth Bean wrote:
> We ducked this by explaining our wireless design was
That's a cool one.
Does it happen with 20MHz channels as well?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 2:15 PM Michael Davis wrote:
> How did you isolate it to channels 60+ and 64- ? We have started seeing
> odd issues
> with MacBooks on AP 200 series APs, but never thought to correlate it to
> channels
I believe the basis for his idea is that, because 802.11 clients are far
more sensitive to other 802.11 clients as opposed to noise, it's better to
have those extra channels, whose overlapping channels would sound like
noise to clients not on that specific channel. I am not saying I agree with
I have never heard of that before. That is extremely interesting.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:18 AM SWARTZ, POLA
wrote:
> Amen
>
>
>
> *Smile, *
> *Pola Swartz*
>
> *WAN/Wireless Infrastructure Manager Department of Technology Services*
> *780 Grant St., Denver, CO 80203*
> #p 720-423-3603 | c
For what it's worth, a quick acsp neighbors check on one of our dorm AP's
shows ~10 of the same MAC addresses you mentioned: 62:45:b etc.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:12 PM Will Dawes wrote:
> We took an Ekahau Sidekick spectrum capture of the interference from the
> Xbox One console today.
>
>
>
Ryan,
I wish I could help you out, but I won't be at the conference.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:56 AM Turner, Ryan H
wrote:
> All:
>
>
>
> Others have sent a few messages about this, but I’ll be more direct…
>
>
>
> There is never a guarantee that we get multiple sessions at national
>
We don't get complaints about APs in the rooms, but I have thought about
starting a rumor that the real danger is ad-hoc/wifi direct printers. After
all, they're blasting at 20dbm out of the box compared to my whisper-quiet
APs. Parents that care would either take those things back to Best Buy or
Tom,
Absolutely. And, this isn't meant to be rude, because we are going through
the same issues currently, but the only fix is better wireless.
On the other hand, when students play from these consoles, they're really
setting your team up behind the eight ball. These devices love the 2.4
For our campus, the difference between .11n and .11ac lags behind the speed
at which density has increased.
That is to say, it's pointless to say we had 30 clients working fine on
.11n in this much space and now we're going to 30 clients on .11ac in the
same area, because that's almost never the
Are your cells overlapping too much? It's hard to believe that even an
apple product would stick to a -85 signal when seeing other AP's at -65
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Carter
wrote:
> It is better, but notice this list is only on specific devices. For
>
If it'll block gamma rays, it'll block wifi.
Lead. :)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Sweetser, Frank E wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> we just got word that a professor here wants to start running a
> certificate program around a wireless lab setup. To mitigate any potential
>
I've not seen this either. Is the Xbox renewing its IP address?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Hunter Fuller wrote:
> I haven't run into this.
>
> I'm curious what a "session timeout" is in this context. (Session with
> what?)
> Also, what is the wireless system involved? And
It depends on the construction, but we typically have 1 AP to 2.5 rooms.
The APs are placed inside the rooms, but they're not 1-to-1.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Adam T Ferrero wrote:
> We have an AP in nearly every suite. That is what made things work well
> for us.
>
>
I can't help you, but you've stumbled on to a pet peeve of mine that I feel
compelled to share.
In buildings, we have cameras, air returns, lighting, clocks, TV's, fire
alarms, sprinkler heads, sprinkler systems, air ducts, window units,
ceiling grills, exit signs, water-stained tiles, conduits
MC has been Aerohive now for a few years.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Mark Reboli
wrote:
> MU currently utilizes Cisco
>
>
>
> M
>
> [image: Description: MU Arches]
>
> Mark Reboli
>
> Network/Telecom Manager
>
> Misericordia University
>
> (570) 674-6753
>
>
>
>
We used to... but we now don't spend much time trying to mitigate rogue APs
on our network.
Many wireless devices now come out of the box broadcasting their own SSID.
Some Rokus even disallow the turning off of their SSIDs - the only way to
get them to stop is to physically disconnect the radio.
19 matches
Mail list logo