On 19/4/20 4:08 am, Turner, Ryan H wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We think we resolved it. As others said before, it was the port we
> was wrong. As soon as we changed it to 1700, everything worked. The
> thing that has me scratching my head is why the Cisco WLC would be
> responding with properly
riday, April 17, 2020 1:28 PM
>> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change
>> of Authorization)
>>
>> Here are some PCAPs for you folks.
>> htt
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Both of those worked. Both received ACKs from the WLC.
On Apr 17, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Turner, Ryan H
mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
Thank you!. You are gettin
.
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> on behalf of Turner, Ryan H
> mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:01 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>
.
Ryan
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Turner, Ryan H
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:38 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Thank you!. You are getting
Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Here are some PCAPs for you folks.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/njdfxt9bfo89xte/AABmaJkT9W2h9RoAirdQ0GV8a?dl=0
One
Thank you!!
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Here are some PCAPs
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Care to share a link to the doc?
On Apr 17, 2020, at 10:13 AM, Turner, Ryan H
mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
I really think Felix hit the nail on the head. I found the documen
ss Issues Community Group Listserv
>> > <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:03 PM
>> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>>
AUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
> On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:03 PM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change
> of Authorization)
>
> We use 1700 as well
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
We use 1700 as well for our CoA stuff against the Cisco 8540 with PacketFence.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
We use 1700 as well for our CoA stuff against the Cisco 8540 with PacketFence.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
on behalf of Turner, Ryan H
: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
I reversed that. The standard is 3799, and I know Cisco tends to use 1700.
But I see plenty of documentation on 3799 for Cisco. I’ll confirm.
From: Turner, Ryan H
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:00 PM
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Abhiramms
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 11:25 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Ryan,
Have you tried UDP port 1700.
As far as I can
CAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Ryan,
Have you tried UDP port 1700.
As far as I can remember, the default port when adding a radius client for a
cisco device was 1700.
Also - I usually refer to this link that has the d
if I can get
> it removed.
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
> On Behalf Of Felix Windt
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:52 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change
>
o:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>"
mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
We currently use Extreme Network Access Control. We have had this for 14 years
and it works very well. We i
nity Group Listserv
Date: Friday, April 17, 2020 at 9:26 AM
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU"
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
We currently use Extreme Network Access Control. We have had this for 14 years
and it works very
18 matches
Mail list logo