Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

d <chu...@psu.edu> Reply-To: Chuck Enfield <chu...@psu.edu> Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 1:41 PM To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet Thanks GT, I definitely agree with your overall point, but I have to take issue with

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet I think there's a short term risk vs long term reward. In the short term, there's little benefit to W2 and more risk of code stability, lack of features, etc. In the long term, MU will bring some benefit. How

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 11:34 AM To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet Brian, Food for thoughts... How is the over-subscription to the commodity Internet keeping up with

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

CAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Philippe Hanset > <phan...@anyroam.net> > Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> > Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 11:34 AM > To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> > Subjec

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet Brian, Food for thoughts... How is the over-subscription to the commodity Internet keeping up with Wi-Fi these days? Most services are in the cloud and it seem

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

e: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 11:34 AM To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet Brian, Food for thoughts... How is the over-subscription to the commodity Internet keeping up with Wi-Fi these days? Most services are in the cloud and it seems

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

Brian, Food for thoughts... How is the over-subscription to the commodity Internet keeping up with Wi-Fi these days? Most services are in the cloud and it seems that Internet Commodity could be the limiting factor rather than wave1 or wave2 or even staying with 802.11n. Is it worth worrying

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

There are few problems I see with this line of thinking. a) This is the same argument people made when 802.11n arrived i.e. Stick with 802.11g as it’s less expensive, proven, and there are hardly any 11n clients. For those of us who jumped on the cutting edge, we road an explosive wave

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

;WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Brian Helman <bhel...@salemstate.edu> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Date: Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 7:57 AM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELES

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > on behalf of Jake Snyder > Date: Friday, 5 August 2016 at 10:41 PM In the competitive stuff, I am seeing

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet

t; [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W > (Network Services) > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 7:41 AM > To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Outsourced ResNet > > Any idea why they are specifying 11ac Wave