Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Jamie Savage
M3J 1P3, CANADA Lee H Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/17/2008 09:04 AM Please respond to The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU To WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU cc Subject [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread John Cox
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? At risk of sounding silly- is anyone wrestling with the appearance of early 11n products? Contrast any of the current offerings with the MIMO antennas versus the likes of the Cisco 1130 (integrated antennas) from an aesthetics perspective

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Dale W. Carder
On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Lee H Badman wrote: At risk of sounding silly- is anyone wrestling with the appearance of early 11n products? Contrast any of the current offerings with the MIMO antennas versus the likes of the Cisco 1130 (integrated antennas) from an aesthetics perspective,

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Philippe Hanset
, Equipment Supplies -Original Message- From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:02 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Lee H Badman wrote: At risk

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Tom Magrini
- From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:26 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? No offense to anyone- but for us the enclosure notion is cost prohibitive. Can almost double the per-AP cost which has

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Lee H Badman
Message- From: Frank Bulk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 1/17/2008 3:59 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? Are you suggesting a dongle that plugs into two Ethernet ports on a Cisco switch that transports the Ethernet and power

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Frank Bulk
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:56 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? snip But... I'll restate my concern with Cisco 802.11n wireless strategy: Hopefully it's not too late for Cisco to reconsider providing an the option to bond two

RE: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Frank Bulk
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:35 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? Yikes, Frank- you're painting one expensive work around scenario for big WLANs- especially when better silicon is right around the corner... why

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Dale W. Carder
On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: I think what the vendors are offering now will work with the final standard with minimal or no compatibility issues. If it's anything like the pre-g crap that was on the market before that was standardized, then this is a fallacy. The hardware

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n?

2008-01-17 Thread Frank Bulk
-Original Message- From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] The Aesthetics of 11n? On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: I think what the vendors