Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

We are seeing many of the congestion issues of 2.4GHz ameliorating themselves as clients are self-selecting 5GHz. Especially in the higher density environments where the 2.4GHz congestion was extreme. On our campus, 5GHz now represents 80% of the data transferred (up from 28% six years ago),

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

h 6, 2017 at 6:20 PM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 One thing I like in your design is the 5GHz only and dual band. So many people try a 5GHz only and a 2.4Ghz only and it backfires on them. Sent from my iP

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

CAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Danny Eaton > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 7, 2017 7:20 AM > > > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 > > > > I see so many IoT devices that are 2.4 only; as well as the students save > $30 on the laptop buying it with jus

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 We still have a lot of devices (especially low-end smartphones) that only have 2.4 radios. [http://www.york.edu/Portals/0/Images/Logo/YorkCollegeLogoSmall.jpg] Joel Coehoorn Director of Information Technology 402.363.5603

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hunter Fuller Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 10:45 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 Yes, we are attempting this strategy, but so far the rejoicing has been more limited than

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

areas, and so far, the results are positive. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Coehoorn, Joel Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 10:45 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

.@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, March 6, 2017 9:20:11 PM > > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 > One thing I like in your design is the 5GHz only and dual band. So many > people try a 5GHz only and a 2.4Ghz only and it

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 9:20:11 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 One thing I like in your design is the 5GHz only and dual band. So many people try a 5GHz only and a 2.4Ghz only and it backfires on them. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 6, 2017, at 3:

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

chnology Services > The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 > Ph: +61 8 8313 4800 > > From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv > [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Casey Feskens > Sent: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 4:58 AM > To: WIRELESS-LA

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

stituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Casey Feskens Sent: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 4:58 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5 We are currently using a 5GHz only SSID (as well as 2.4) and have been trying to encourage

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

We are currently using a 5GHz only SSID (as well as 2.4) and have been trying to encourage students to use it. We recently conducted a survey of wireless performance and asked questions about why people were using 2.4 networks vs. 5GHz. A surprising number of students replied that their devices

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

Similarly, we haven't looked at it. You can walk into Best Buy today and walk out with a brand new laptop with no 5GHz wireless. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:13 PM Jeffrey D. Sessler wrote: > I don’t think there is a way to get away from 2.4 yet in EDU. For example, >

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

I don’t think there is a way to get away from 2.4 yet in EDU. For example, while most would install high-density 5GHz in every residential room, it’s likely cost-prohibitive to accomplish the same in hallways and other areas that devices transit but don’t linger. As such, 2.4 is still important

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

We still have a lot of devices (especially low-end smartphones) that only have 2.4 radios. Joel Coehoorn Director of Information Technology 402.363.5603 *jcoeho...@york.edu * *Please contact helpd...@york.edu for technical assistance.* The mission of