> On 10 Mar 2016, at 22:36, Curtis K. Larsen wrote:
>
> About a year and a half ago I did pretty exhaustive testing of RADIUS load
> with the Spirent
> traffic generator and with the assistance of PacketFence developers.
> (PacketFence is also based
> on
About a year and a half ago I did pretty exhaustive testing of RADIUS load with
the Spirent
traffic generator and with the assistance of PacketFence developers.
(PacketFence is also based
on FreeRADIUS). They suggested we tweak the MaxConcurrentAPI setting on our
test AD server. So
we did,
If AD is not keeping up with the NTLM requests, giving the DCs more NTLM worker
threads can help it keep up with higher loads.
Working with TAC we found specifically in the ACS logs that it was waiting for
Windows to respond.
As far as number of devices, they weren't showing increases over
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:54:59AM -0800, Jake Snyder wrote:
> That's for the great info on FreeRadius. I don't think this is
> the case in what I'm seeing that, which is specifically that
> Windows AD is not keeping up with NTLM.
OK, that's interesting. I think the issue that others have
This exact discussion came up in a ClearPass in-depth class yesterday at
Atmosphere/Airheads since ClearPass (based on FreeRadius) only has so many
worker threads. Anything over a 2 sec delay between ClearPass and AD was...not
ideal.
The class was "Adapting to Evolving User, Security and
Matthew,
That's for the great info on FreeRadius. I don't think this is the case in
what I'm seeing that, which is specifically that Windows AD is not keeping up
with NTLM.
These are customers with environments that are relatively stable and have been
performing well for extended periods of
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:14:02AM -0500, Earl Barfield wrote:
> >Just wanted to throw this out to the educause community to see if others
> >are seeing this. Although this is not ultimately a problem with Higher Ed,
> >the large scale RADIUS deployments in higher ed resulting in more impact
>
>
Date:Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:05:07 -0700
From:Jake Snyder <jsnyde...@gmail.com>
Subject: Recent Radius Meltdowns
Just wanted to throw this out to the educause community to see if others
are seeing this. Although this is not ultimately a problem with Higher Ed,
the large scale
University
315.443.3003
-Original Message-
From: Jake Snyder [jsnyde...@gmail.com]
Received: Wednesday, 09 Mar 2016, 17:35
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Recent Radius Meltdowns
I don't necessarily agree with the doc in all
V.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Recent Radius Meltdowns
>
> Just wanted to throw this out to the educause community to see if others are
> seeing this. Although this is not ultimately a problem with Higher Ed, the
> large scale RADIUS deployments in higher ed resulting in
2016, 16:05
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Recent Radius Meltdowns
Just wanted to throw this out to the educause community to see if others are
seeing this. Although this is not ultimately a problem with Higher Ed, the
large
Thanks, Jake. We are experiencing this as we speak.
- Patched AD servers on 2/28/16
- Noticed one radius server reporting SAMBA/NTLM slow response times on 3/2 and
3/3
- Took that server out of service
- A second radius server reporting same issue 3/8 and today, 3/9
Aruba Controllers
Aruba
Just wanted to throw this out to the educause community to see if others
are seeing this. Although this is not ultimately a problem with Higher Ed,
the large scale RADIUS deployments in higher ed resulting in more impact
Several weeks ago we had a higher ed customer who's Radius environment
13 matches
Mail list logo